出品 / 新浪科技（ID:techsina） 作者 / 罗宁 携程租车上租路虎，到手竟然是丰田？ 近日，微博百万粉丝大V博主发布内容，称自己在携程租车上租了3天路虎卫士，结果"货不对板"，"订 单是卫士，验车单是卫士，拿到的是一台战损版的丰田兰德克鲁泽。八万公里，车里到处是烟灰和污 渍，全车都是臭的。" 《BUG》栏目发现，类似事件并非个例，有车主甚至连续在平台上遭遇两次"货不对板"，同时还质疑平 台"虚假宣传"等等。 针对上述多种情况，《BUG》栏目向携程官方进行求证，截至发稿，官方暂未回应。 值得注意的是，今年8月和9月，携程接连被约谈。同样在9月，据统计，梁建章、范敏、熊星等高管合 计拟套现约7.6亿元人民币。高管在公司业绩向好、股价接近历史高点时密集减持，引发了市场对公司 未来预期的种种猜测。 租车货不对板，屡有发生？ 微博平台粉丝量超过172万的大V博主flypig在其个人账号上发布了自己在携程租车"被坑"经历。他在携 程租车平台预订了一辆路虎卫士，四天时间共计花费5567元，然而提车时却遭遇"货不对板"。根据该博 主晒出的订单和验车单图片，他租用的是一辆2年车龄的路虎卫士，盖章公司为鑫佰隆（成都） ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of fake agricultural experts exploiting farmers through online platforms, emphasizing the need for stricter regulation and accountability from these platforms to protect farmers from scams [1][5][11]. Group 1: Identification of the Problem - Many farmers have reported encountering fake agricultural experts online who falsely claim to have extensive experience and offer free agricultural guidance [2][3]. - These impostors use deceptive tactics such as creating fake personas, dramatizing their expertise, and aggressively marketing ineffective agricultural products [4][10]. - The phenomenon reflects a broader issue of moral decay in platform governance, where the pursuit of traffic and profit overshadows ethical responsibilities [11][18]. Group 2: Impact on Farmers - The so-called "expertise" provided by these individuals often lacks scientific validity, leading farmers to purchase overpriced and ineffective agricultural products driven by trust and anxiety [12][14]. - The platforms have been criticized for ignoring false information, allowing these scams to proliferate unchecked [15][16]. Group 3: Recommendations for Platforms - Platforms must abandon the excuse of "technical neutrality" and take responsibility for the dissemination of false information, as their inaction harms not only farmers but society as a whole [19][21]. - A proposed "three checks and three verifications" mechanism for agricultural accounts includes verifying educational credentials, professional qualifications, and work history [22][23]. - The implementation of AI technology for content verification and the establishment of a user-participation monitoring network are recommended to combat misinformation effectively [25][26][30]. Group 4: Importance of Agriculture - Agriculture is deemed vital for the nation, and farmers are essential to land cultivation, making the fight against misinformation in this sector crucial [28][30].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining ethical standards in the development of medical science communication through short videos, highlighting both the benefits and the potential pitfalls of this medium [1][2][3]. Group 1: Current Landscape of Medical Science Communication - A significant portion of the population engages with health science content via short video platforms, with 92.1% of 1.074 billion online viewers having encountered such content [1]. - While short video medical science communication can enhance public health literacy, issues such as misinformation, commercialization, and unethical practices are prevalent [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures and Industry Standards - Recent regulations from multiple government bodies aim to ensure the authenticity and scientific validity of medical science communication on social media platforms [1][2]. - Platforms are encouraged to implement robust regulatory mechanisms, such as peer review systems and operational guidelines for medical accounts, to enhance content quality and accountability [2][3]. Group 3: Future Directions and Opportunities - The article suggests that promoting high-quality content creation should be balanced with strict regulation, advocating for initiatives like "AI pre-review + expert verification" and credit systems for quality creators [3]. - The ongoing implementation of the "Healthy China 2030" initiative aims to improve the quality of medical science communication, ultimately benefiting public health [3].