Workflow
医美价格战
icon
Search documents
强如韩国医美,也开始讲究性价比了
3 6 Ke· 2025-10-10 09:50
Core Insights - The South Korean medical beauty market, once a lucrative "golden standard," is facing increased competition and price wars due to the rise of neighboring markets and the trend towards "light medical beauty" [1][4] - Despite the market's growth, with a projected size of $572.14 million in 2023 and 1.2 million foreign patients expected in 2024, the intense competition is leading to a significant decline in prices and profit margins [4][5] - The shift from high-end, specialized services to standardized, low-cost offerings is causing a disruption in the pricing structure, resulting in a "revenue without profit" scenario for many institutions [4][10] Market Dynamics - The average prices for popular procedures have dropped by 10% to 20% since 2020, with specific treatments like photorejuvenation seeing prices fall from 300,000 KRW to below 200,000 KRW by 2025 [4][10] - The high penetration rate of medical beauty services in South Korea indicates a saturated domestic market, leading to a focus on retaining existing customers rather than acquiring new ones [5][12] - The increasing transparency of pricing and the prevalence of social media comparisons among international clients are pushing clinics to adopt more competitive pricing strategies [5][12] Competitive Landscape - Smaller clinics are struggling to compete against larger, capitalized players, with many experiencing revenue declines of 10% to 20% in early 2025 [9] - Collaborations between leading institutions, such as the partnership between Aimeike and REGEN Biotech, highlight a trend towards combining technology, capital, and market access to enhance competitive advantages [9][12] - The proliferation of advanced medical equipment is diminishing the technological barriers that once separated top-tier institutions from smaller clinics [10][12] Strategic Shifts - The industry is witnessing a transition from a "celebrity doctor" model to a more standardized service approach, necessitating a balance between personalized and standardized offerings [10][11] - Institutions are encouraged to focus on niche markets, such as specialized treatments for specific demographics, to differentiate themselves and avoid price wars [10][12] - The rise of home beauty devices indicates a growing consumer acceptance of technology in skincare, prompting medical beauty institutions to explore partnerships with tech companies for integrated service offerings [13] Global Expansion - South Korean medical beauty brands are increasingly looking to expand internationally, particularly in markets like China, leveraging their strong technology and training systems [13][14] - The shift from relying solely on medical tourism to actively pursuing overseas markets represents a strategic pivot for the industry [13][14] - Successful companies will be those that invest in technology, talent, and brand building, moving away from a price-centric model to one focused on comprehensive value [14][15]
新氧打响价格战第一枪:“童颜针”跌破3千元
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-09-23 09:16
Core Viewpoint - The price war in the "童颜针" (youthful injection) market is intensifying, with New Oxygen (SY.O) launching its 奇迹童颜3.0 at a record low price of 2999 yuan, significantly undercutting competitors whose prices range from 13,000 to 24,000 yuan [1] Group 1: Product Launch and Pricing Strategy - New Oxygen's 奇迹童颜3.0 utilizes a formulation called "塑缇妍," which is a combination of hyaluronic acid produced by Jiangsu Xihong Biological Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. [2] - The product is part of a broader strategy where New Oxygen has previously launched versions 1.0 and 2.0, but faced disputes with upstream suppliers over pricing [3] - The upstream suppliers, including 普丽妍 and 圣博玛, demanded retail prices of 16,800 yuan and 18,800 yuan respectively, while New Oxygen priced its earlier versions at 4,999 yuan and 5,999 yuan [3][4] Group 2: Market Dynamics and Competitive Pressure - The increasing number of approved injection products has diminished the pricing control that upstream suppliers have over downstream distributors, exacerbated by aggressive pricing strategies from internet platforms [5] - Competitors like 美团 and 京东 are also engaging in significant price reductions, with 美团's subsidies bringing the price of certain products down from 6,000 yuan to around 900 yuan, and 京东 offering substantial discounts [5] - The trend indicates that downstream players are gaining more pricing power, putting additional pressure on upstream suppliers [6]