博弈

Search documents
X @XQ
XQ· 2025-08-31 14:31
感谢猫姐的认可,在高铁上看完电影很感慨,刚想写点什么,打开推发现多了好多关注,也正好先和大家介绍一下我自己。我在22年7月入市,那个时候正好是本科毕业的暑假,我拿着学校发的最后一笔奖学金一万元入了圈。当时是 NFT 的后期,我当时在 b 站刷到一些介绍 NFT 的视频,今天 freemint 明天一张就是几百块,觉得很感兴趣就自己照着一些教程入了圈。当时看的最多的是 @0xhueyy 的教程,她的教程风格是偏技术又不过于硬核,于是我跟着开始入金、下载钱包、打新。现在用这个蓝色 mfer 头像也是因为 hueyy 老师,当时她也是蓝色的 mfer,代表了我对区块链的最初印象。那个时候到铭文再到去年以前,我都没有赚到什么大钱。由于一直是自己一个人玩,我的绝大部分经验都是亲自踩坑和总结出来的,一个人炒币的过程很孤独,所以我走的很慢。那个时候我也尝试过邀请身边的人入圈一起玩,但除了我哥坚持到现在了以外,其他的同学都因为爆仓或者其他的原因早早在牛市之前离开了市场,所以我选择了适应这种一个人的过程,在市场交易、试错、总结经验教训、让下次做的更好,一次又一次的周而复始我走到了今天。我刚刚发现我看一年前的自己都会觉得陌生,交 ...
高段位的狠人,绝不暴露自己的底线
3 6 Ke· 2025-06-09 07:45
Group 1 - The core principle in negotiations is to avoid revealing one's bottom line, as it serves as a critical leverage point in any deal [1][14] - In a negotiation scenario, the party with the most information about the other's bottom line holds the advantage, allowing for strategic pricing and concessions [6][7] - Both parties often engage in tactics to obscure their true positions, such as feigning financial constraints or creating the illusion of competition [9][10] Group 2 - The dynamics of negotiation are akin to a game of strategy, where understanding human nature and the fear of loss can significantly influence outcomes [15][17] - In professional settings, demonstrating scarcity and the potential loss of an employee can be more persuasive than simply highlighting their value [16][17] - Mastery of negotiation requires a deep understanding of both one's own limits and the psychological aspects of the counterpart [12][18]
喜欢骂老板的人,多半是loser
3 6 Ke· 2025-06-03 09:43
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying rules and logic of society and the workplace, arguing that a victim mentality leads to ineffective problem-solving and a lack of personal growth [2][3][12]. Group 1: Understanding the Workplace Dynamics - Individuals who frequently criticize their bosses often exhibit a "loser mentality," which stems from a limited understanding of societal rules and dynamics [2][3]. - The article suggests that success and failure are often misattributed, with individuals blaming external factors for their failures while taking credit for their successes [3][4]. - It highlights that laws and regulations serve as a safety net but do not provide special treatment for individuals, emphasizing the need for personal responsibility and initiative [5][6]. Group 2: The Role of Market Forces - The article discusses how laws primarily maintain a basic order in society, allowing for market self-regulation and individual agency within certain boundaries [7][8]. - It argues that attempts to enforce fairness through external means can disrupt market dynamics and lead to long-term negative consequences [8][9]. - The natural order of competition and survival is likened to a food chain, where interference can lead to broader ecological issues [9][10]. Group 3: Personal Empowerment and Value Creation - The article encourages individuals to understand their value within organizational structures rather than seeking fairness or equity [15][18]. - It posits that personal strength and negotiation skills are crucial for career advancement, with a focus on understanding supply and demand dynamics [19][23]. - The relationship between employees and employers is framed as a negotiation, where understanding each party's needs can lead to mutual benefit [19][20]. Group 4: Realistic Perspectives on Employment - The article asserts that emotional responses to workplace challenges are ineffective, and that true change comes from personal capability and market understanding [17][21]. - It emphasizes that the labor market values skills and contributions over emotional appeals, and that individuals must adapt to market realities to succeed [21][22]. - The importance of recognizing one's position in the market and leveraging it for personal gain is highlighted, suggesting that individuals should focus on enhancing their skills and marketability [23][24].