欧洲终于喊出"唐纳德，够了" 新华社记者陈斌杰 当大西洋彼岸的盟主一边将欧洲视为可任意索取、肆意拿捏的"后花园"和"殖民地"，一边在乌克兰危机 中要求欧洲"冲锋陷阵"并独自买单时，欧洲精英层痛苦地意识到：所谓"安全承诺"，其实是一种昂贵 的"附庸税"，唯命是从的结果，只会沦为地缘政治的"耗材"。在不久前的达沃斯世界经济论坛年会期 间，加拿大总理卡尼坦言，所谓"基于规则的秩序"正在消亡。 面对"美国冲击"，欧洲正竭力"自救"。欧盟与印度近日签署自贸协定，释放出清晰信号：欧洲要加 速"去美国风险"。前不久，欧盟与南方共同市场正式签署自贸协定，扩展属于自己的"朋友圈"。这些举 措旨在分散风险，并告诉华盛顿：欧洲的贸易版图不只有美国。 中欧经贸合作同样受到瞩目。近期，中欧本着相互尊重态度，在世贸组织规则框架下妥善解决电动汽车 案，显著提振市场信心，为中欧汽车贸易投资合作注入新的动力。大众、空客等欧洲企业不断在华加码 布局。 近期，欧洲多国领导人相继访华，释放出强烈的政治信号：他们在重新审视全球格局下的自身定位，寻 找能够提供增长动力和稳定性的方案。 一个没有战略自主的欧洲，只能在别国的地缘游戏中沦为筹码。也只有战略自 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the tumultuous and destructive first year of Trump's second term, highlighting the polarization in American society and the impact of his unilateral actions on global stability and international order [1]. Group 1: Administrative Actions - Trump signed a record of over 40 executive orders on his first day, totaling 229 executive orders by January 15, covering various issues such as immigration and federal spending [6]. - The term "executive order governance" is used to describe Trump's administration, indicating a significant expansion of presidential power and a weakening of Congress's role [4][6]. Group 2: Foreign Policy and Diplomacy - Trump's administration has been characterized by coercive diplomacy, exemplified by the "century quarrel" with Ukraine, where military aid was suspended to pressure Ukraine into signing agreements [7]. - The administration's approach to international relations has been marked by threats and sanctions, which have not led to peace but rather increased conflict risks [7]. Group 3: Economic Policies - Trump's imposition of tariffs on global trade partners has reached the highest levels in nearly a century, severely impacting the multilateral trade system and prompting retaliatory measures from other countries [12]. - The "big and beautiful" tax and spending bill signed on Independence Day has been criticized for benefiting the wealthy while cutting food and medical assistance for the poor, exacerbating income inequality [18]. Group 4: Social Unrest and Immigration - The administration's strict immigration policies have led to significant social unrest, with protests escalating into violence in cities like Los Angeles [15][17]. - Public sentiment has turned against Trump's immigration policies, with a majority of Americans believing the administration has gone too far [17]. Group 5: Political Climate - The year has seen increasing political violence, with incidents affecting both parties, raising concerns about the normalization of such violence in American society [20]. - The federal government experienced a record 43-day shutdown due to partisan conflicts, highlighting the dysfunction within American democracy [22]. Group 6: International Relations - The U.S. has been absent from key international events, symbolizing a retreat from multilateralism and a disregard for global governance responsibilities [23]. - The release of the national security strategy report reflects a dismissive attitude towards allies, indicating a shift in transatlantic relations and a focus on unilateral actions [26].

Group 1 - The article highlights the tension between the US and India following Trump's imposition of a 50% punitive tariff on Indian goods, which is seen as a direct response to India's continued purchase of Russian energy [1][3] - Modi's refusal to engage with Trump and his subsequent diplomatic engagements with China and Japan indicate a significant shift in India's foreign policy stance, moving away from the US [1][3] - Sullivan's comments reflect a broader concern about the erosion of US credibility among its allies, with many now viewing China as a more reliable partner [3][5] Group 2 - The 50% tariff is expected to severely impact India's export sectors, particularly textiles, jewelry, leather, and light industries, which are heavily reliant on the US market [3][5] - The article notes that the current situation represents the most serious deterioration in US-India relations since the Cold War, with both countries reverting to mutual sanctions reminiscent of 1998 [3][6] - The article also discusses the growing sentiment among US allies, including those in Europe and Asia, to mitigate risks associated with US policies, indicating a shift in global alliances [5][8] Group 3 - China's proactive diplomatic efforts and its ability to present itself as a stable partner contrast sharply with the US's current approach, which is characterized by unpredictability [6][8] - The article suggests that the US's unilateral actions are leading to a reconfiguration of global power dynamics, with China gaining influence and the US's hegemonic position being challenged [6][8] - The internal political strife within the US, particularly between the Democratic and Republican parties, is noted as a factor that complicates the US's foreign policy towards China, despite a bipartisan consensus on the need to counter China [8]

Group 1 - The article highlights the unpredictability of the U.S. economic outlook, indicating a heightened risk of recession [1] - The U.S. trade policy, particularly the imposition of tariffs, has created confusion and negatively impacted market optimism and investor confidence [3] - Trust in the federal government has significantly declined among U.S. businesses and households across various sectors [3][4] Group 2 - The article discusses the global implications of the U.S. trade war initiated by President Trump, suggesting it has put the global free trade system in crisis [5] - The upcoming "reciprocal tariffs" set to be implemented from April 2 will target countries with significant trade surpluses with the U.S. and higher tariff rates [6][7] - A significant portion of the U.S. trade deficit is with Asian countries, indicating a regional concentration in trade dynamics [8] Group 3 - The article notes that countries like India, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam have higher tariff rates than the U.S., which could lead to shifts in the global economic order [9] - The previous U.S. administration's focus on "de-risking" supply chains has been replaced by a new narrative that escalates the trade war, posing risks to global economic security [9] - The uncertainty surrounding U.S. policies has prompted global companies to consider "de-risking" from the U.S. market [10]