根据台湾的有关规定，弹劾赖清德，需要台湾"立法院"一半以上"立委"提议。这一点国民党和民 众党可以做到。 民进党敢砸锅，国民党和民众党的正常反应就应该是掀桌子， 就应该去倒阁。如果国民党和民众党真的倒阁了，赖清德未必 敢解散"立法院"。现在，国民党和民众党发起了不可能成功的 弹劾，只能算是中策。 作者：王义伟 封图：本报资料室 对于由"《财政收支划分法》部分条文修正草案"争议引发的危机，国民党（蓝营）和民众党（白 营）终究没有采取玉石俱焚的方法对行政部门进行倒阁。他们将枪口抬高一寸，瞄准了赖清德。 12月19日，国民党和民众党宣布在"立法院"启动弹劾赖清德的程序。 同一时间，台湾民间人士在网络上发起弹劾赖清德的联署，不到24小时联署人数破600万。虽然 民间联署并不具备法定效力，但600万人的声援还是从一个侧面反映了台湾的民心。 需要指出的是，通过正常程序弹劾赖清德，成功的可能性不大。 就在这个关键时刻的前夕，特朗普政府掏出一张巨额账单，来为赖清德站台了。 12月17日，美国国防部国防安全合作署（DSCA）公布最新对台军售项目，美国将向台湾出售总 价约111亿美元的武器装备。这是迄今为止美国最大的一笔对台军售 ...

（原标题：台海观澜｜蓝白弹劾赖清德，美国武装赖清德） 对于由"《财政收支划分法》部分条文修正草案"争议引发的危机，国民党（蓝营）和民众党（白营）终 究没有采取玉石俱焚的方法对行政部门进行倒阁。他们将枪口抬高一寸，瞄准了赖清德。 12月19日，国民党和民众党宣布在"立法院"启动弹劾赖清德的程序。 同一时间，台湾民间人士在网络上发起弹劾赖清德的联署，不到24小时联署人数破600万。虽然民间联 署并不具备法定效力，但600万人的声援还是从一个侧面反映了台湾的民心。 然后还有第三步，"立法院"的决议需要提交到"宪法"法庭评议，参与评议的"大法官"不得少于10人，2/3 以上同意才能判决弹劾成立。目前台湾的"大法官"只有8人，且政治立场偏绿的居多，且不说能不能开 庭，即使开庭了也不可能判决弹劾案成立。 这就如同国民党和民众党手里有枪，但子弹射程只有200米，而赖清德远在600米开外。 因此，国民党和民众党发起的弹劾，更像是一场宣传战，让台湾民众看清赖清德的真面目，并提高国民 党和民众党的声势。 就在这个关键时刻的前夕，特朗普政府掏出一张巨额账单，来为赖清德站台了。 12月17日，美国国防部国防安全合作署（DSCA）公布 ...

Core Viewpoint - The involvement of Japan in the Taiwan Strait issue is seen as a provocation rather than support for Taiwan, with claims that Japan's actions may harm Taiwan instead of helping it [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Position on Taiwan - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent statements suggest that any military action by China against Taiwan could pose a "survival crisis" for Japan, which is viewed as an inappropriate interference in the Taiwan issue [1]. - The scholar Fujii Shizue argues that Japanese politicians are using Taiwan as leverage to promote Japan's militarization and to appease the United States, which could escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait [1]. Group 2: Historical Context - Fujii Shizue emphasizes that Japan's historical actions during the invasion of China and its colonial rule over Taiwan are significant, asserting that Japan has no right to interfere in China's internal affairs regarding Taiwan [2]. - The return of Taiwan to China in 1945 is highlighted as a resolution to the sovereignty issue, countering any Japanese claims to Taiwan [2]. Group 3: Critique of Current Political Dynamics - Fujii criticizes Taiwanese independence politicians for ignoring historical truths and suggests that their actions reflect a colonial mindset [3]. - The scholar calls for a recognition of history and a deep reflection on past mistakes to prevent repeating them, advocating for dialogue between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait as a means to ease tensions [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's Prime Minister's provocative remarks regarding the Taiwan issue, suggesting the possibility of military intervention, which is viewed as a serious threat to China's sovereignty and a challenge to international order [2] Group 1: Political Implications - The remarks by Japan's leadership are seen as a violation of international justice and a provocation against the post-war international order [2] - The potential for Japan to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait is characterized as an act of aggression, with a strong warning from China that it would respond decisively [2] Group 2: China-Japan Relations - The article emphasizes that Japan's attempts to interfere in Taiwan affairs could severely damage China-Japan relations [2] - It asserts that China has significantly changed since previous decades, indicating a stronger stance against any perceived threats from Japan [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent remarks about potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait have sparked outrage in Taiwan, with critics arguing that such statements could escalate tensions and endanger Taiwan's stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Reactions from Taiwanese Leaders - Former Taiwanese leader Ma Ying-jeou criticized Kishi's comments as unwise and detrimental to Taiwan's interests, emphasizing that cross-strait issues should be resolved by the parties involved without foreign interference [2]. - Former Kuomintang chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu condemned the rhetoric as provocative and a sign of historical arrogance, asserting that Taiwan is no longer a Japanese colony and should not be used as a pawn in geopolitical games [3]. - Former legislator Kuo Cheng-liang expressed concern over Kishi's statements, suggesting that they reflect a dangerous mindset within Japan's ruling party [4]. Group 2: Implications for Japan-Taiwan Relations - Analysts warn that Kishi's comments could severely impact Japan-China relations, especially given the historical context of Japan's occupation of Taiwan [5]. - The current political climate in Japan, characterized by a rightward shift, may complicate regional stability and peace in East Asia, with Taiwan potentially becoming a diplomatic pawn in Japan's strategy against China [7]. - Taiwanese media highlight the need for caution from the Taiwanese government to avoid exacerbating tensions and to navigate the delicate geopolitical landscape [6].

Core Viewpoint - The former chairperson of the Kuomintang, Hung Hsiu-chu, criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding Taiwan, labeling them as "naked historical arrogance and political interference" and emphasizes that peace in the Taiwan Strait relies on the efforts of the people on both sides, not on military intervention from Japan or calculations from the United States [1][3]. Group 1 - Hung Hsiu-chu questions Japan's involvement in Taiwan's affairs, stating that recent comments from Japanese politicians linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's national crisis are provocative and dangerous [3]. - She asserts that Taiwan is no longer a Japanese colony and criticizes Japan for not having adequately apologized for its colonial past, questioning its right to comment on Taiwan Strait issues [3]. - Hung highlights that the Taiwan Strait issue is an internal matter stemming from civil war remnants, and foreign politicians should not interfere, warning that any external forces attempting to manipulate Taiwan will ultimately fail [3]. Group 2 - The commentary from Hung Hsiu-chu indicates a strong stance against Japan's military involvement in Taiwan, asserting that peace should be achieved through mutual efforts rather than foreign military presence [3]. - She emphasizes that Taiwan is not a pawn and should not be treated as a stage for Japan's ambitions, reiterating that historical grievances remain unresolved [3].

Core Points - The South Korean government has confirmed that the upcoming South Korea-U.S. summit will not discuss South Korea's role in the event of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait [1][3] - Both South Korea and the U.S. have coordinated to ensure that this hypothetical scenario will not be included in the summit agenda [1][3] Summary by Sections - **Government Position**: South Korean officials have stated that discussions regarding South Korea's role in a potential Taiwan Strait conflict are purely hypothetical and will not be addressed in the summit [3] - **U.S. Response**: The U.S. has also indicated that it will not include the issue of South Korea's role in a Taiwan Strait crisis in the summit discussions [3] - **China's Stance**: The Chinese government has reiterated its position that the Taiwan issue is an internal matter and that external forces have no right to interfere [3]

Group 1 - The article narrates the life journey of Lee Jae-myung, highlighting his struggles from a young age, including severe workplace injuries and family hardships [1][5][6] - Lee's determination to pursue education despite his challenging circumstances led him to pass significant academic exams and eventually enroll in a prestigious university [14][16][17] - His early career as a lawyer focused on advocating for the rights of marginalized workers, which laid the foundation for his later political ambitions [21][24][27] Group 2 - Lee Jae-myung's political career began with his involvement in local governance, where he implemented policies aimed at reducing debt and improving public services in a financially troubled city [33][39] - His election as the governor of Gyeonggi Province and subsequent presidential campaign showcased his grassroots appeal and commitment to social justice [40][42] - The article discusses the political turmoil following his near-assassination, which significantly impacted the political landscape in South Korea [48][52][56] Group 3 - Lee's approach to governance emphasizes transparency and accountability, often challenging established political norms and advocating for the underprivileged [38][60] - His views on international relations, particularly regarding China and the U.S., reflect a pragmatic stance aimed at balancing economic interests with national security [66][68][70] - The article concludes with a reflection on the broader implications of Lee's political journey and the challenges facing South Korea in a complex geopolitical environment [76][78]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of Trump's comments on U.S.-China trade relations and their potential impact on Taiwan, emphasizing that the U.S. policy towards Taiwan remains unchanged despite interpretations of Trump's remarks [2][3]. Group 1: U.S.-China Relations - Trump's statement regarding "unification and peace" is interpreted as a reference to the Taiwan issue, highlighting the sensitivity of Taiwan in U.S.-China relations [3]. - The article suggests that Trump's comments may indicate a willingness to resolve the Taiwan issue through peaceful negotiations, similar to trade discussions [3]. Group 2: Taiwan's Political Climate - There is growing concern among Taiwanese citizens about the possibility of Taiwan being "sold out" by the U.S. under Trump's administration, reflecting fears about Taiwan's sovereignty [3]. - The article mentions a discussion on a television program where a Taiwanese politician expressed similar concerns, indicating a broader anxiety within Taiwan regarding its future [3][4]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article posits that the inevitability of cross-strait unification is a historical direction, while the emergence of political figures like Lai Ching-te represents an accidental turning point that could escalate tensions [4]. - The discussion includes the notion that both Trump and Lai could be seen as coincidental factors influencing the trajectory of cross-strait relations [4].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around Trump's statement regarding the benefits of US-China trade talks for "unification and peace," which is interpreted as a reference to the Taiwan Strait issue [1][3]. - Trump's comments have prompted immediate responses from Taiwan's authorities, emphasizing that his remarks pertain to trade relations and do not alter US policy towards Taiwan [2][3]. - The article suggests that Trump's business-oriented perspective may lead him to seek advantages for the US in the context of China's unification process, indicating a potential transactional nature to US-China relations [3]. Group 2 - There is growing concern within Taiwan about the possibility of being "sold out" by the US, reflecting fears regarding the implications of US-China negotiations on Taiwan's status [4]. - The article references a discussion on a television program where concerns were raised about Taiwan's territorial integrity and the potential for it to be compromised in negotiations [5]. - The narrative suggests that the emergence of political figures like Lai Ching-te in Taiwan could represent a turning point in cross-strait relations, highlighting the unpredictable nature of political developments [6][8].