在台日籍学者：日本在台海问题上插手挑衅，绝非"挺台"而是"害台" 中新社北京11月21日电 (黄欣欣 张杨彬)就日本首相高市早苗日前发表的涉台挑衅言论，在台日籍学 者、台湾政治大学民族学系兼任教授藤井志津枝近日接受中新社电话专访指出，台湾民众绝不能将"台 湾有事，日本有事"的说法看作是对台湾的"善意"，日本在台海问题上插手挑衅，绝非"挺台"而是"害 台"。 高市早苗日前宣称，若中国大陆对台湾动武，可能构成日本"存亡危机事态"。在藤井志津枝看来，日方 不该也不能在台海问题上置喙。"这些极右翼日本政客真的在乎台湾吗？我想答案是否定的。" 藤井志津枝指出，高市早苗的相关言论，本质是将台湾当作推动日本军事化的"杠杆"和讨好美国的"筹 码"，只会激化台海局势，对台湾民众百害无一利，只有少数别有用心的政客得利。 藤井志津枝表示，由于历史渊源，对包括台湾问题在内的领土主权等原则性问题，中方绝不会有任何形 式的妥协退让。高市早苗低估了触碰台湾问题之于中国的严重性。 她指出，日本在侵华期间曾将资源掠夺奉为国策，试图以此铺就帝国崛起之路，1945年战败的结果已证 明这种模式行不通。1945年日本战败，台湾回归中国，台湾主权问题早 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's Prime Minister's provocative remarks regarding the Taiwan issue, suggesting the possibility of military intervention, which is viewed as a serious threat to China's sovereignty and a challenge to international order [2] Group 1: Political Implications - The remarks by Japan's leadership are seen as a violation of international justice and a provocation against the post-war international order [2] - The potential for Japan to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait is characterized as an act of aggression, with a strong warning from China that it would respond decisively [2] Group 2: China-Japan Relations - The article emphasizes that Japan's attempts to interfere in Taiwan affairs could severely damage China-Japan relations [2] - It asserts that China has significantly changed since previous decades, indicating a stronger stance against any perceived threats from Japan [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent remarks about potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait have sparked outrage in Taiwan, with critics arguing that such statements could escalate tensions and endanger Taiwan's stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Reactions from Taiwanese Leaders - Former Taiwanese leader Ma Ying-jeou criticized Kishi's comments as unwise and detrimental to Taiwan's interests, emphasizing that cross-strait issues should be resolved by the parties involved without foreign interference [2]. - Former Kuomintang chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu condemned the rhetoric as provocative and a sign of historical arrogance, asserting that Taiwan is no longer a Japanese colony and should not be used as a pawn in geopolitical games [3]. - Former legislator Kuo Cheng-liang expressed concern over Kishi's statements, suggesting that they reflect a dangerous mindset within Japan's ruling party [4]. Group 2: Implications for Japan-Taiwan Relations - Analysts warn that Kishi's comments could severely impact Japan-China relations, especially given the historical context of Japan's occupation of Taiwan [5]. - The current political climate in Japan, characterized by a rightward shift, may complicate regional stability and peace in East Asia, with Taiwan potentially becoming a diplomatic pawn in Japan's strategy against China [7]. - Taiwanese media highlight the need for caution from the Taiwanese government to avoid exacerbating tensions and to navigate the delicate geopolitical landscape [6].

Core Viewpoint - The former chairperson of the Kuomintang, Hung Hsiu-chu, criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding Taiwan, labeling them as "naked historical arrogance and political interference" and emphasizes that peace in the Taiwan Strait relies on the efforts of the people on both sides, not on military intervention from Japan or calculations from the United States [1][3]. Group 1 - Hung Hsiu-chu questions Japan's involvement in Taiwan's affairs, stating that recent comments from Japanese politicians linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's national crisis are provocative and dangerous [3]. - She asserts that Taiwan is no longer a Japanese colony and criticizes Japan for not having adequately apologized for its colonial past, questioning its right to comment on Taiwan Strait issues [3]. - Hung highlights that the Taiwan Strait issue is an internal matter stemming from civil war remnants, and foreign politicians should not interfere, warning that any external forces attempting to manipulate Taiwan will ultimately fail [3]. Group 2 - The commentary from Hung Hsiu-chu indicates a strong stance against Japan's military involvement in Taiwan, asserting that peace should be achieved through mutual efforts rather than foreign military presence [3]. - She emphasizes that Taiwan is not a pawn and should not be treated as a stage for Japan's ambitions, reiterating that historical grievances remain unresolved [3].

Core Points - The South Korean government has confirmed that the upcoming South Korea-U.S. summit will not discuss South Korea's role in the event of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait [1][3] - Both South Korea and the U.S. have coordinated to ensure that this hypothetical scenario will not be included in the summit agenda [1][3] Summary by Sections - **Government Position**: South Korean officials have stated that discussions regarding South Korea's role in a potential Taiwan Strait conflict are purely hypothetical and will not be addressed in the summit [3] - **U.S. Response**: The U.S. has also indicated that it will not include the issue of South Korea's role in a Taiwan Strait crisis in the summit discussions [3] - **China's Stance**: The Chinese government has reiterated its position that the Taiwan issue is an internal matter and that external forces have no right to interfere [3]

Group 1 - The article narrates the life journey of Lee Jae-myung, highlighting his struggles from a young age, including severe workplace injuries and family hardships [1][5][6] - Lee's determination to pursue education despite his challenging circumstances led him to pass significant academic exams and eventually enroll in a prestigious university [14][16][17] - His early career as a lawyer focused on advocating for the rights of marginalized workers, which laid the foundation for his later political ambitions [21][24][27] Group 2 - Lee Jae-myung's political career began with his involvement in local governance, where he implemented policies aimed at reducing debt and improving public services in a financially troubled city [33][39] - His election as the governor of Gyeonggi Province and subsequent presidential campaign showcased his grassroots appeal and commitment to social justice [40][42] - The article discusses the political turmoil following his near-assassination, which significantly impacted the political landscape in South Korea [48][52][56] Group 3 - Lee's approach to governance emphasizes transparency and accountability, often challenging established political norms and advocating for the underprivileged [38][60] - His views on international relations, particularly regarding China and the U.S., reflect a pragmatic stance aimed at balancing economic interests with national security [66][68][70] - The article concludes with a reflection on the broader implications of Lee's political journey and the challenges facing South Korea in a complex geopolitical environment [76][78]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of Trump's comments on U.S.-China trade relations and their potential impact on Taiwan, emphasizing that the U.S. policy towards Taiwan remains unchanged despite interpretations of Trump's remarks [2][3]. Group 1: U.S.-China Relations - Trump's statement regarding "unification and peace" is interpreted as a reference to the Taiwan issue, highlighting the sensitivity of Taiwan in U.S.-China relations [3]. - The article suggests that Trump's comments may indicate a willingness to resolve the Taiwan issue through peaceful negotiations, similar to trade discussions [3]. Group 2: Taiwan's Political Climate - There is growing concern among Taiwanese citizens about the possibility of Taiwan being "sold out" by the U.S. under Trump's administration, reflecting fears about Taiwan's sovereignty [3]. - The article mentions a discussion on a television program where a Taiwanese politician expressed similar concerns, indicating a broader anxiety within Taiwan regarding its future [3][4]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article posits that the inevitability of cross-strait unification is a historical direction, while the emergence of political figures like Lai Ching-te represents an accidental turning point that could escalate tensions [4]. - The discussion includes the notion that both Trump and Lai could be seen as coincidental factors influencing the trajectory of cross-strait relations [4].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around Trump's statement regarding the benefits of US-China trade talks for "unification and peace," which is interpreted as a reference to the Taiwan Strait issue [1][3]. - Trump's comments have prompted immediate responses from Taiwan's authorities, emphasizing that his remarks pertain to trade relations and do not alter US policy towards Taiwan [2][3]. - The article suggests that Trump's business-oriented perspective may lead him to seek advantages for the US in the context of China's unification process, indicating a potential transactional nature to US-China relations [3]. Group 2 - There is growing concern within Taiwan about the possibility of being "sold out" by the US, reflecting fears regarding the implications of US-China negotiations on Taiwan's status [4]. - The article references a discussion on a television program where concerns were raised about Taiwan's territorial integrity and the potential for it to be compromised in negotiations [5]. - The narrative suggests that the emergence of political figures like Lai Ching-te in Taiwan could represent a turning point in cross-strait relations, highlighting the unpredictable nature of political developments [6][8].