合规用工

Search documents
2025年9月社保新规落地,小微个体户如何合规用工?
首席商业评论· 2025-08-14 09:59
Core Viewpoint - The new social security regulations effective from September 2025 will invalidate any agreements to not pay social security, impacting small businesses and individual operators who may struggle to afford these payments [3][4]. Group 1: New Regulations and Compliance - The new regulations are not entirely new, as previous laws have mandated social security contributions for standard labor contract employees since 1993 and 2011 [4]. - All forms of employment will now require social security contributions, and the consequences for non-compliance are clearly defined, including penalties and compensation responsibilities [4][6]. Group 2: Implications for Small Businesses - Small businesses and individual operators cannot legally establish agreements to voluntarily forgo social security contributions, and violations will result in a threefold penalty: back payments, fines, and compensation to employees [6]. - Companies must pay back owed amounts with a daily late fee of 0.05%, and employees can terminate contracts and receive economic compensation based on their tenure [6]. Group 3: Strategies for Compliance - Small businesses facing financial difficulties can consider flexible employment models, such as hiring part-time employees or re-employing retirees [8][10]. - Other strategies include signing labor contracts where employees independently pay their social security, outsourcing non-core tasks, and adjusting employee structures to include part-time or family-managed roles [10]. Group 4: Reasons for New Regulations - The introduction of the new social security regulations is driven by the severe issue of unpaid or underpaid social security, with only over 200 million out of approximately 700 million employed individuals contributing [14]. - There is a growing awareness of rights among employees, necessitating clearer judicial interpretations and measures regarding social security disputes [14]. - The regulations aim to phase out inefficient businesses that exploit employees, pushing industries towards quality and service improvements rather than solely competing on price [14].
从禁用到停工,员工讲述亲历罗马仕充电宝“雷暴”:这一月像过山车,心情很复杂
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-07-06 15:24
Core Viewpoint - The company Romoss is facing unprecedented challenges leading to a formal announcement of a six-month suspension of operations starting from July 7, 2025, due to market changes and business needs [3][6][12]. Group 1: Company Situation - Romoss has been experiencing significant operational difficulties, with rumors of bankruptcy circulating in early July 2023, prompting a response from the CMO highlighting the company's struggles [7][12]. - The internal communication regarding the suspension was abrupt, with employees expressing feelings of confusion and lack of prior notice about the operational changes [8][11]. - The company is attempting to manage its workforce by implementing a rotation system for departments affected by the sales halt, while also engaging in discussions with government and financial stakeholders [6][7]. Group 2: Employee Impact - Employees will receive their regular salaries for the first month of the suspension, but from the second month, payments will be adjusted to 80% of the local minimum wage as per regulations [6][12]. - There is a sense of uncertainty among employees regarding the future of the company, with some expressing doubts about the compliance of the suspension process and the management's communication [8][11]. - Employees have been actively involved in customer service roles during the product recall, leading to increased workloads and stress [11]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The company plans to resume operations as soon as the necessary 3C certification is obtained, indicating a potential timeline for recovery [11][12]. - Legal experts suggest that the company must balance cost-cutting measures with compliance to labor laws, emphasizing the importance of maintaining open communication with employees during this period [12][13]. - The situation serves as a cautionary tale for other companies in the industry, highlighting the need for quality control and risk management to avoid similar operational crises [12][13].