据此前报道，诉状称，两人合谋破解了前苹果软件工程师伊桑·利普尼克正在开发的iPhone，以获取 iOS 19（最终被称为 iOS 26）的详细信息并从中获利。普罗瑟在其分享的视频中泄露了现在被称为 iOS 26 的各种细节。 外媒称，拉马乔蒂对苹果投诉的回应截止日期被延长至 10 月 17 日，因为文件显示，他在最初的 8 月 14 日回应截止日期过后才聘请了律师。 【环球网科技综合报道】10月12日消息，据MacRumors报道，今年7月，苹果公司起诉乔恩·普罗瑟和迈 克尔·拉马乔蒂，指控他们窃取公司商业机密。根据法庭文件，本周案件取得了一些进展。 尽管没有回应苹果的诉讼，普罗瑟仍继续在社交媒体上传视频，包括本周早些时候发布的 iPhone Air 评 测。（思瀚） 周五，苹果公司律师表示，普罗瑟尚未回应投诉，也未以其他方式出庭。因此，他们已向普罗瑟提交缺 席判决申请，这可能导致指定法官作出有利于苹果的裁决。苹果正在寻求金钱赔偿，并寻求禁令，以阻 止普罗瑟和拉马乔蒂进一步披露苹果的机密信息。 来源：环球网 ...

北京时间10月3日上午，OpenAI通过官方新闻账号对马斯克最新以诉讼为幌子的骚扰策略作出回应。OpenAI表示，不需要也不想要任何人的商业机密。 OpenAI将保护员工，不会被马斯克试图欺凌他们的行为所吓倒。 OpenAI还在官网发布了对马斯克商业机密诉讼的辩护书和驳回动议。在辩护书中，OpenAI表示，此案旨在制造舆论，以恐吓和威胁那些行使权利离开并 到AI行业其他地方工作的员工，并试图阻止更多人离开xAI。OpenAI强烈反对这种策略，并将自始至终地支持其员工。 此前的诉讼文件显示，马斯克旗下人工智能初创公司xAI在美国加州联邦法院起诉竞争对手OpenAI，指控其窃取商业机密以在人工智能技术竞赛中获取不 正当优势。诉讼称，OpenAI存在"令人深感不安的惯例"，即通过挖角xAI前员工来获取与人工智能聊天机器人Grok相关的商业机密。 诉讼文件显示，OpenAI被指挖走了八名xAI员工，属于一项"有组织的计划"，目的是获取机密信息。xAI上个月已经针对其中一名员工Xuechen Li提起单独 诉讼。 值得一提的是，这是马斯克对OpenAI发起的第六次诉讼。此前马斯克的五项诉讼分别为： 5、2025年8月， ...

每经编辑｜金冥羽 北京时间10月3日上午，OpenAI通过官方新闻账号对马斯克最新以诉讼为幌子的骚扰策略作出回应。OpenAI表示，不需要也不想要任何人的商业机密。 OpenAI将保护员工，不会被马斯克试图欺凌他们的行为所吓倒。 OpenAI还在官网发布了对马斯克商业机密诉讼的辩护书和驳回动议。在辩护书中，OpenAI表示，此案旨在制造舆论，以恐吓和威胁那些行使权利离开并 到AI行业其他地方工作的员工，并试图阻止更多人离开xAI。OpenAI强烈反对这种策略，并将自始至终地支持其员工。 此前的诉讼文件显示，马斯克旗下人工智能初创公司xAI在美国加州联邦法院起诉竞争对手OpenAI，指控其窃取商业机密以在人工智能技术竞赛中获取不 正当优势。诉讼称，OpenAI存在"令人深感不安的惯例"，即通过挖角xAI前员工来获取与人工智能聊天机器人Grok相关的商业机密。 诉讼文件显示，OpenAI被指挖走了八名xAI员工，属于一项"有组织的计划"，目的是获取机密信息。xAI上个月已经针对其中一名员工Xuechen Li提起单独 诉讼。 值得一提的是，这是马斯克对OpenAI发起的第六次诉讼。此前马斯克的五项诉讼分别为： 1 ...

北京时间10月3日上午，OpenAI通过官方新闻账号对马斯克最新以诉讼为幌子的骚扰策略作出回应。OpenAI表示，不需要也不想要任何人的商业机密。 OpenAI将保护员工，不会被马斯克试图欺凌他们的行为所吓倒。 图片来源：OpenAI官方网站 图片来源：OpenAI官方新闻账号@OpenAI Newsroom 此前，马斯克旗下AI公司xAI曾对OpenAI发起多个诉讼，包括指控OpenAI诱导前xAI员工窃取并分享xAI的商业机密，违反了相关法律。 OpenAI还在官网发布了对马斯克商业机密诉讼的辩护书和驳回动议。在辩护书中，OpenAI表示，此案旨在制造舆论，以恐吓和威胁那些行使权利离开并 到AI行业其他地方工作的员工，并试图阻止更多人离开xAI。OpenAI强烈反对这种策略，并将自始至终地支持其员工。 图片来源：OpenAI官方网站 OpenAI与马斯克的"恩怨"由来已久，OpenAI也曾多次对马斯克的诉讼实施反击。 8月，据新华社报道，马斯克旗下的xAI和社交媒体平台X8月25日起诉苹果公司和开放人工智能研究中心（OpenAI），指控这两家公司联手实施"反竞 争"计划，维持在智能手机和生成式人工智能市场 ...

OpenAI通过官方新闻账号对马斯克的诉讼作出回应：OpenAI不需要也不想要任何人的商业机密，我们 将保护我们的员工，不会被马斯克试图欺负他们的行为所吓倒。 OpenAI否认了xAI的指控，称其主张既虚假又缺乏证据支持。 "在马斯克的领导下，xAI的优秀员工正成群离职，其中部分人选择加入OpenAI，助力推进OpenAI的使 命，"相关法律文件中写道，"这些员工完全有权选择就职去向，OpenAI也有权聘用他们。" 而这已是过去一年半，马斯克对OpenAI发起的第六次诉讼大战，诉讼从加州法庭升级到联邦法庭，指 控也一次比一次严重，从最初的合同违约到不公平竞争到涉嫌垄断再到窃取商业机密。 马斯克对这起诉讼的评论是：忍无可忍，无须再忍。 而今日，OpenAI称这起案件是马斯克对该公司"持续骚扰"的一部分。 据媒体报道，上周，马斯克旗下的xAI向加州北区联邦法院提起诉讼，指控OpenAI系统性有预谋地挖角 其员工，非法窃取商业机密。 xAI在诉讼文件中声称，OpenAI存在"令人深感不安的模式"和"战略性行动"。 故意诱导这些员工违反保密协议，试图获取xAI的源代码、数据中心启动的运营优势、技术进步和战略 业务计划 ...

Core Viewpoint - Musk's company xAI has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing it of systematically poaching employees and stealing trade secrets, marking the sixth lawsuit in a year and a half of escalating tensions between the two companies [2][3][4]. Group 1: Allegations of Trade Secret Theft - xAI accuses OpenAI of deliberately poaching key employees who possess critical knowledge of its Grok model and data center strategies, which could provide OpenAI with significant competitive advantages and save billions in operational costs [4][12]. - Musk expressed his frustration on social media, stating that after multiple warnings to OpenAI, legal action became the only option due to their continued deceptive practices [4][5]. - OpenAI has denied the allegations, claiming the lawsuit is merely Musk's latest attempt to harass the company for his own financial interests [4][5]. Group 2: Specific Cases of Employee Poaching - The lawsuit details instances of three employees allegedly poached by OpenAI, including engineers Xuechen Li and Jimmy Fraiture, who had access to core technologies and strategic plans [5][10]. - Li is accused of downloading xAI's entire codebase before leaving the company and joining OpenAI, having also sold $7 million worth of company stock prior to his departure [7][8]. - Another engineer, Fraiture, is also accused of copying technical documents before joining OpenAI, further supporting xAI's claims of trade secret theft [10][11]. Group 3: Implications of the Lawsuit - xAI's lawsuit could have significant ramifications for both companies, potentially leading to substantial damages for OpenAI if xAI proves its case, as well as restrictions on OpenAI's ability to hire former xAI employees [13][16]. - The lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of legal disputes in Silicon Valley, where talent poaching and trade secret theft are common, especially in the competitive AI sector [14][15]. - Musk's ongoing legal battles with OpenAI reflect a deepening rivalry, as both companies vie for dominance in the AI industry, with Musk's xAI rapidly gaining traction and valuation [17][19].

Core Points - The lawsuit centers around a former xAI engineer who sold over $4.7 million worth of xAI stock in June and subsequently copied the company's core codebase to personal devices before resigning to join OpenAI [2] - Elon Musk confirmed on social media that the entire xAI codebase was stolen, supported by logs and a handwritten statement from the individual involved [2] - The lawsuit reveals that OpenAI has hired at least eight xAI employees, including the infrastructure engineering lead, Uday Ladulaj, and the former senior financial officer, Mike Liberto, who left after only three months [2] - Musk stated that after multiple warnings went unheeded, the lawsuit was the "only option" [2] - OpenAI has not publicly responded to the lawsuit but previously claimed that Musk's demands were "baseless" [2]

Core Viewpoint - Apple has filed a lawsuit against OPPO and a former employee, Chen Shi, alleging that they conspired to steal trade secrets related to the Apple Watch [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, naming Chen Shi, OPPO, and its affiliate InnoPeak Technology, Inc. as defendants [1]. - Chen Shi worked as a sensor systems architect at Apple from January 2020 until June 2025, and he allegedly downloaded 63 confidential files just days before leaving Apple to join OPPO [2][12]. - The downloaded files reportedly included sensitive technical implementation plans and information about both current and unreleased Apple products [2][13]. Group 2: OPPO's Response - OPPO has stated that it respects the trade secrets of all companies, including Apple, and has not violated any of Apple's trade secrets [2]. - The company is cooperating with legal proceedings and believes that a fair judicial process will clarify the facts [2]. Group 3: Apple Watch Market Position - Since the launch of the Apple Watch in September 2014, Apple has maintained a leading position in the global smartwatch market, attributed to its design and integration with the Apple ecosystem [4]. - Apple has invested hundreds of millions of dollars to enhance the Apple Watch's features, including advanced health monitoring capabilities [4]. Group 4: Chen Shi's Actions - Chen Shi began communicating with OPPO's health vice president, Dr. Zeng Zijing, in April 2025, prior to officially notifying Apple of his departure [10]. - Evidence presented by Apple indicates that Chen Shi's downloading activity increased significantly in June 2025, with the number of files downloaded nearing the total from the previous five months [12]. Group 5: InnoPeak's Connection to OPPO - InnoPeak is described as OPPO's U.S. research center, with various links and associations between the two entities highlighted in Apple's lawsuit [6]. - The lawsuit mentions that InnoPeak employees have publicly identified themselves as OPPO employees, further establishing the connection [6].

Core Viewpoint - Apple has filed a lawsuit against OPPO, accusing the company of encouraging a former high-paid employee, Chen Shi, to steal trade secrets related to Apple Watch technology before joining OPPO [2][4]. Group 1: Allegations Against Chen Shi - Chen Shi allegedly accessed confidential documents related to Apple's health sensor technology shortly before leaving the company to facilitate OPPO's development of competitive wearable devices [2]. - The lawsuit claims that Chen Shi arranged numerous one-on-one meetings with Apple Watch team members to gather research information while concealing his intention to join a direct competitor [2][3]. - In the days leading up to his departure, Chen Shi reportedly downloaded 63 files from a protected folder and transferred them to a USB drive [2]. Group 2: OPPO's Response - An OPPO representative stated that the company is aware of the lawsuit and has reviewed Apple's allegations, asserting that there is no evidence linking the claims to Chen Shi's conduct during his time at OPPO [5]. - OPPO emphasized its respect for all companies' trade secrets, including Apple's, and stated that it has never infringed upon Apple's trade secrets [5]. Group 3: Legal Implications - Apple argues that if Chen Shi and OPPO's actions go unpunished, it would undermine Apple's commitment to innovation and the significant investments made in technologies like Apple Watch, while also providing unfair advantages to competitors [6]. - The case is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with the case number 5:25-cv-7105 [7].