日前，上海阿姨独吞6兄弟姐妹同属拆迁款，每天躺在百万现金上睡觉的新闻引发舆论热议。 记者从上海市虹口区人民法院（以下简称虹口法院）了解到，事件的主人公郑阿姨作为家中长女，户口 落在母亲老宅。老宅被征收后，她独自领取了280余万元补偿款，母亲遂将其诉至法庭。 虹口法院审理后认定，这笔征收款应归其母亲所有，判决郑阿姨需返还。然而，母亲病逝，这笔钱一下 子变成了遗产，6个兄弟姐妹都有继承权。但郑阿姨拒不履行法院判决，用各种理由拒绝支付。虹口法 院执行局干警在她家中搜查发现，床底下藏了100万元现金！经过一番细致搜查，在床底的盒子里、牛 奶盒中陆续找到了被藏匿的现金，总计240余万元。 考虑到郑阿姨的实际生活状况及其在照顾父母方面的付出，法院组织调解，其他兄弟姐妹让了一步，双 方达成和解协议。 "躺在百万拆迁款上睡觉"这样的闹剧究竟是如何被法官发现的？法官在强制执行后为何又组织调解？此 案反映了怎样的社会心理和司法理念？记者就此专访本案执行法官——虹口法院执行局法官李佩业，独 家回应上述问题。 1、郑阿姨的户口也落在母亲老宅，法院为何判决280余万拆迁款全部归其母亲所有？判决生效后，郑阿 姨拒不履行，其行为可能产生哪 ...

扬子晚报网12月24日讯(通讯员任丹丹夏蕾记者姜天圣)为进一步优化法治化营商环境，护航经济社会高质量发展，12月24日，镇江中院召开"见'镇'执行法 护营商"涉企执行工作新闻发布会暨新时代法治故事宣讲会。市中院党组成员、执行局长张巧林，执行局副局长张镇，执行指挥中心副主任徐雯出席会 议，市人大代表伊立、周岳新、董晓助，市政协委员王坤、高晓芳应邀参会。 现场 下一步，全市法院将继续深入贯彻落实上级法院关于优化法治化营商环境、强化善意文明执行理念的工作要求，进一步规范全市法院涉企案件执行工作， 以高质量司法服务护航我市经济高质量发展。 会上，张镇副局长发布了2起涉企执行典型案例。徐雯副主任解读了市中院加强涉企案件执行工作20条举措。 在"讲好新时代法治故事"环节，镇江中院执行局法官助理朱跃东结合本次活动主题，生动讲述了一起镇江法院通过创新执行方式让"冻结的资产"转化 为"流动的现金"、实现双方共赢的真实案例故事。 校对陶善工 现场 发布会上，张巧林局长介绍2025年度镇江法院涉民生案件专项执行工作概况。他指出，镇江法院将涉企案件执行作为服务保障经济社会高质量发展的重要 着力点，坚持"依法强制"与"善意文明"并重， ...

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights an innovative approach to asset resolution through public disclosure of settlement agreements, which effectively avoids the negative impacts of auction processes and leads to a swift conclusion of a long-standing dispute [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Financial Obligations - In February 2015, a court ruled that a new materials company must repay a bank a principal amount of 170 million RMB and interest of approximately 7.89 million RMB [2]. - The company failed to fulfill its obligations, prompting the bank to seek enforcement through the court, which led to the involvement of a different court due to jurisdictional issues [2]. Group 2: Challenges in Asset Liquidation - The court's attempts to auction the collateral resulted in multiple failed attempts, leading to the termination of the enforcement process due to the inability to liquidate the assets [3]. - The bank subsequently transferred the non-performing asset to a state-owned asset management company, which sought to restart the enforcement process [3]. Group 3: Resolution Strategies - The court adopted a collaborative approach, facilitating negotiations between the parties to reach a consensus on the asset's value, ultimately leading to a settlement agreement in April 2025 [4]. - The settlement included a unique public disclosure clause, allowing for transparency and the opportunity for third parties to raise objections or make higher offers [5]. Group 4: Implications of the Settlement - The asset management company successfully publicized the settlement agreement, which, after a designated period without objections, allowed for the resolution of the case and the unfreezing of the debtor's assets [5]. - This case is noted as the first instance of a public disclosure of a settlement agreement on the JD asset trading platform, setting a precedent for future asset resolutions in a declining auction market [6]. Group 5: Judicial Perspectives - The execution judge emphasized the importance of transparency in asset disposal processes, noting that the public disclosure approach mitigated risks of undervaluation and potential loss of state assets [7]. - The case exemplifies a flexible and efficient method for resolving disputes, particularly in cases involving unique asset types or where parties are willing to negotiate alternative settlement terms [7].

杭州法院开展集中执行行动 单日执行到位2.39亿元 中新网杭州9月16日电(钱晨菲 方璐 滕腾)9月16日，杭州法院开展"执护营商—鲲鹏执行2025"集中执行 行动，出动干警689人次，入户调查356处，拘传128人，腾退房屋74处，共执结案件588件，查扣车辆、 款项及腾退厂房、土地、住宅等价值2.39亿元。 据了解，今年以来，杭州法院执结案件81435件，同比上升86.6%，执行到位149.24亿元，执行收、结案 量浙江第一；司法拘留2599人，查扣车辆1935辆；以涉嫌拒执犯罪移送公安机关221件，同比上升 33%，法院判处63件。(完) 来源：中国新闻网 杭州中院指挥调度两级法院开展集中执行行动。蒋冰倩 摄 编辑：付健青 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 当日，随着浙江省杭州市中级人民法院党组书记、院长唐学兵一声令下，杭州两级法院执行干警们兵分 多路，开展行动。本次行动重点聚焦小标的、涉民生、涉企、涉 ...

Core Viewpoint - In 2024, the People's Courts are effectively addressing complex execution cases and long-standing historical cases through designated and elevated execution methods, aiming to convert the "paper rights" of winning parties into "real money," with a notable decrease in the number of individuals on the dishonesty list for the first time in ten years [1] Group 1: Execution Progress - In 2024, over 260,000 cross-execution cases were handled nationwide, resulting in substantial progress or resolution of 130,000 cases, with an execution amount exceeding 130 billion yuan [2] - The Supreme Court has conducted on-site research and tailored 32 cross-execution "health checklists" for various high courts, ensuring effective resource allocation and addressing local protectionism [2][6] - The execution environment has significantly improved, with a number of cases being held accountable [3] Group 2: Execution Statistics - The execution work in 2024 is characterized by "two decreases and two increases": the number of first-time execution cases and individuals on the dishonesty list both decreased, while the execution rate and actual execution amount increased [4] - Over 8.8 million first-time execution cases were accepted, showing a decline of over 6%, while the number of individuals on the dishonesty list decreased by over 20% [4] Group 3: Civilized Execution Initiatives - The courts have been promoting a civilized execution approach, focusing on distinguishing between dishonesty and "inability," and implementing systems for credit repair and warnings [5] - In 2024, 2.457 million new individuals were added to the dishonesty list, a decrease of 23.4%, while 2.821 million individuals successfully returned to the market through credit repair, an increase of 35.4% [5] Group 4: Collaborative Measures - The Supreme Court has expanded its collaborative efforts with 13 central ministries to enhance execution capabilities, achieving over 10 breakthroughs in locating individuals and assets [6] - A total of over 100 joint punitive measures against dishonest individuals have been implemented, with significant progress in the construction of a credit supervision and warning mechanism [6]