Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of talent in driving technological innovation, which in turn opens up markets and enhances talent cultivation, creating a positive feedback loop for the national innovation system [1][2] - Recent reforms in higher education, particularly in engineering, have led to the organized and large-scale joint training of over 20,000 engineering master's and doctoral students across more than 60 universities and 100 enterprises [1][2] - The shift in educational focus towards enhancing problem-solving abilities and aligning training with industry needs has effectively addressed the disconnect between academic research and practical engineering applications [2][3] Group 2 - Continuous and comprehensive reforms in higher engineering education are necessary to ensure the expected outcomes, including establishing better platforms for university-enterprise resource integration and improving intellectual property distribution mechanisms [3] - Collaborative initiatives, such as the "China Metallurgical Industry Excellence Engineer Training Alliance," demonstrate how universities can innovate talent training methods to better serve national strategies and economic development [3][4] - The new training model for outstanding engineers is seen as a significant step in reforming talent cultivation, contributing to the overall improvement of the national innovation system and supporting national development goals [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of enhancing the technology management system and mechanism in China to foster innovation and achieve the goal of becoming a technology powerhouse by 2035 [1][2]. Group 1: Government Role - The government should strengthen top-level design and institutional supply to create a conducive environment for innovation, focusing on establishing property rights, financial support systems, and research evaluation mechanisms [2][3]. - A clear delineation of responsibilities among government departments is necessary to avoid overlapping functions and enhance collaborative governance [3]. Group 2: Market Role - The market must play a crucial role in optimizing resource allocation and discovering value, as market-oriented innovation systems demonstrate significantly higher resource allocation efficiency compared to administrative-led systems [4]. - Establishing a national technology trading market and promoting the marketization of data elements are essential steps to enhance the innovation ecosystem [4][5]. Group 3: Social Role - The article highlights the need for social collaboration in driving innovation, emphasizing the importance of creating a supportive ecosystem that includes various stakeholders such as enterprises, universities, and research institutions [6][7]. - Building infrastructure for collaborative innovation, such as open research platforms and digital collaboration systems, is vital for fostering a cooperative innovation environment [7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to improve the national innovation system to enhance the vitality of various innovation entities and focus on the forefront of global technology [1][2] - The current innovation capacity in China has been steadily increasing, but overall effectiveness remains weak due to issues such as resource dispersion, redundancy, and inefficiency [1][2] - Strengthening the coordination of innovation resources is essential, which includes establishing a new type of national system and enhancing strategic planning and policy measures [1][2] Group 2 - The development of enterprises, universities, and research institutions is crucial for improving the overall effectiveness of the national innovation system [2] - Promoting the deep integration of industry, academia, and research, and supporting leading enterprises to form innovation consortia are key strategies [2] - Creating a favorable innovation ecosystem requires both institutional and cultural support, including improving intellectual property protection and fostering a culture that encourages innovation [2] Group 3 - The global innovation landscape is undergoing profound adjustments, with international technological competition increasingly becoming a contest of innovation systems [2] - A systematic approach is necessary to enhance the national innovation system and provide solid support for achieving high-level technological self-reliance [2]

Core Viewpoint - The development of new quality productivity must be prioritized strategically during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, emphasizing technology innovation and a robust real economy [1] Group 1: Strategic Focus - The importance of adapting development strategies to local conditions for enhancing new quality productivity is highlighted [1] - A dual approach is advocated, focusing on both the transformation of traditional industries and the active development of emerging industries [1] Group 2: Innovation and Technology - The need to improve the national innovation system and stimulate the vitality of various innovation entities is emphasized [1] - Continuous efforts are required in strengthening basic research and enhancing original innovation capabilities [1] - Urgent action is needed to overcome key core technologies and frontier technologies [1] Group 3: Education and Talent Development - A coordinated approach to the development of education, technology, and talent is essential for establishing a solid foundation for new quality productivity [1]