Workflow
技术民族主义
icon
Search documents
大国科技竞争的本质矛盾是什么?
Hu Xiu· 2025-07-10 00:36
Group 1 - Richard R. Nelson's contributions to the National Innovation System (NIS) theory have reshaped the understanding of technological competitiveness globally [1][9] - The NIS theory emphasizes the interaction between various entities such as enterprises, universities, government agencies, and financial institutions in forming a network for technological accumulation and capability enhancement [7][8] - Different countries exhibit significant variations in their innovation systems, with the U.S. characterized by market-driven and enterprise-led innovation, while Japan and Germany rely more on collaboration between enterprises and government [8][9] Group 2 - Nelson's NIS theory has faced criticism for being a form of techno-nationalism, attributing different technological performances to specific national institutions and policies [10][12] - The rise of globalization has blurred the boundaries of national innovation systems, leading to a call for a reconstruction of a global multi-level innovation system theory [12][14] - The interplay between techno-nationalism and techno-globalism has become a central topic in global technology governance and policy debates [14][20] Group 3 - Nelson's perspective on technology nationalism is nuanced, recognizing the need for emerging industrialized nations to adopt such policies to enhance their technological capabilities [20][23] - The concept of "strategic public goods" in technology suggests that certain critical technologies may require government intervention for development and protection [26][30] - The current global landscape shows a resurgence of technology nationalism, which could lead to a "technological cold war" if not managed properly [32][34] Group 4 - The NIS theory highlights the importance of a robust national innovation system as a foundation for sustainable innovation in the face of global competition [27][29] - The diversity of innovation systems across countries indicates that there is no one-size-fits-all model for innovation, emphasizing the need for effective coordination of innovation elements [29][30] - Promoting inclusive innovation on a global scale is essential to balance national security concerns with technological openness [31][34]
“为开放的世界”,全球大咖云集!凤凰网2025中国企业出海高峰论坛议程公布
凤凰网财经· 2025-06-11 14:11
当单边主义、贸易保护主义阴云笼罩全球供应链,技术封锁、碳壁垒、数据主权争端等新型贸易壁 垒层出不穷,中国企业的全球化征程面临前所未有的复杂挑战。 在此关键历史节点,由凤凰网主办 的 "2025 中国企业出海高峰论坛 " 将于 6 月 28-29 日在深圳 隆重举行。论坛以 " 为开放的世 界 " 为主题,旨在全球产业链深度重构之际,为中国企业搭建思想碰撞、资源对接、规则对话的高 端平台,系统性破解出海难题,探寻生态化、可持续的出海新路径。 大会参会报名平台于今日正式开启。 01 核心议程与顶尖嘉宾阵容揭晓 过去十年,中国企业全球化进程完成三次历史性跨越:从依托劳动力红利的 " 成本驱动型 " 商品 出海,到借力资本杠杆的 " 资源整合型 " 跨国并购,再到以新能源、 AI 、数字技术为载体的 " 规 则定义型 " 标准输出。这场从 " 产品输出 " 到 " 生态赋能 " 的质变,标志着中国角色正由全球产 业链的 跟随者 转向 规则共塑者 。 但另一方面,当中国智造巨轮驶向深海, 地缘政治裂变与规则重构的巨浪已扑面而来: 全球产业链格局深度重构叠加地缘政治紧张, " 效率优先 " 的全球化逻辑让位于 " 安全可 ...
全球AI芯片行业,正走到新的十字路口
经济观察报· 2025-05-20 12:52
Group 1 - The global chip industry is undergoing significant changes, highlighted by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's remarks on AI diffusion rules and chip export controls, indicating a shift in strategy towards promoting U.S. technology globally [2] - The U.S. Department of Commerce's recent actions, including the withdrawal of the AI diffusion rules and the introduction of stricter semiconductor export controls, reflect a growing concern over China's AI industry and its implications for global competition [2][3] - Chinese companies, including Huawei and Xiaomi, are actively pursuing advancements in chip manufacturing and AI technology, demonstrating a rapid evolution in China's AI sector [3] Group 2 - The concept of "technological sovereignty" and rising tech nationalism are disrupting normal business ecosystems, affecting both Chinese firms and Silicon Valley tech giants, who are eager for access to China's vast market [5] - The importance of open-source ecosystems and systems for technological innovation is emphasized, suggesting that attempts to maintain technological advantages through isolation will ultimately lead to stronger alternatives [5][6] - The current landscape of the chip and AI industries presents a choice between continuing down a path of technological nationalism or rebuilding an innovation community based on shared interests [6]