中国始终坚持以人民之心为心、以天下之利为利。"十五五"规划建议明确提出要"积极扩大自主开 放""推动贸易创新发展""拓展双向投资合作空间"，这将为中国同包括美国在内的全球各方拓展共赢合 作打开更广阔空间。期待美方与中方相向而行，以务实行动勇担大国责任，为国际社会带来更多发展信 心。 中美合，世界安；中美斗，世界忧。大国要有大国的样子，要有大国的胸怀和担当。面对新形势、新挑 战，中美双方都应以两国人民利益和世界长期福祉为重，把开放的门开得更大，把合作的路走得更宽， 把稳定的信号释放得更充分，共同为世界应对挑战注入更强劲的正能量。 今年是世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年。在那场关乎人类前途命运的殊死较量中，中美曾并肩战斗，为捍 卫和平与正义作出重大贡献，在至暗时刻拯救了人类文明。回望历史，启示昭彰：为了共同的责任、共 同的未来，中美应该也可以携手合作。 时代演进，让中美合作的分量进一步上升。中美关系不仅影响全球战略格局，也牵动世界经济脉动，关 系各国民众生计。中美贸易互动，直观展现了两国关系的外溢性。从东南亚的生产线，到拉美的贸易 商；从国际金融市场，到全球产业链供应链，中美经贸的丝丝变化，都会在世界经济中激起涟漪， ...

中美合，世界安；中美斗，世界忧。大国要有大国的样子，要有大国的胸怀和担当 经贸风浪惊扰全球之际，中美元首外交充分发挥定盘星作用，为两国关系校准航向。两国元首通过通话 与会晤深入沟通，达成重要共识，为双方妥处分歧、解决问题提供战略引领，为动荡不安的世界注入宝 贵确定性和稳定性。 中美合，世界安；中美斗，世界忧。大国要有大国的样子，要有大国的胸怀和担当。面对新形势、新挑 战，中美双方都应以两国人民利益和世界长期福祉为重，把开放的门开得更大，把合作的路走得更宽， 把稳定的信号释放得更充分，共同为世界应对挑战注入更强劲的正能量。 在元首共识引领下，中美双方团队先后举行5轮磋商，逐步积累共识，推动解决问题。一个事实不断得 到验证：任何试图把中美关系简化为"竞争"甚至"对抗"的叙事，都是对现实的偏离和误读，不仅无益于 问题解决，还会给两国乃至世界制造更严重的新问题。 今年是世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年。在那场关乎人类前途命运的殊死较量中，中美曾并肩战斗，为捍 卫和平与正义作出重大贡献，在至暗时刻拯救了人类文明。回望历史，启示昭彰：为了共同的责任、共 同的未来，中美应该也可以携手合作。 时代演进，让中美合作的分量进一步上升 ...

Core Insights - The meeting in Busan is seen as a stabilizing factor for the turbulent global economy, with leaders from the two largest economies, the U.S. and China, conveying a clear message of improved relations [1] - Trump's statement that "China is America's largest partner" signifies a shift in the narrative from competition to cooperation, highlighting the economic realities that necessitate collaboration [1] - The recent trade discussions in Kuala Lumpur resulted in the U.S. canceling a 10% tariff on Chinese goods and pausing certain export controls, indicating a willingness to compromise for mutual benefit [3] Economic Cooperation - The meeting reflects a departure from the "zero-sum game" mentality, with both nations recognizing that their development can coexist and even promote each other [5] - Trade between the U.S. and China is projected to exceed $700 billion in 2024, with millions of people traveling between the two countries, underscoring the deep economic interdependence [6] - Continuous communication between the two nations has been maintained, with three phone calls and five rounds of economic discussions in the past year, indicating a commitment to dialogue [7][8] Global Responsibilities - Both countries have acknowledged their roles in addressing global challenges such as the Ukraine conflict, Middle Eastern turmoil, and climate change, emphasizing the need for international cooperation [8][9] - The upcoming APEC and G20 meetings, hosted by China and the U.S. respectively, signal a collaborative approach rather than a competitive one [9] Conflict Resolution - The meeting established a framework for handling disagreements through dialogue rather than confrontation, promoting a culture of negotiation [12] - The commitment to maintain regular communication channels is seen as a way to prevent misunderstandings and strategic miscalculations [12] - The emphasis on actionable outcomes from the meeting, such as the implementation of tariff reductions and addressing specific business issues, is crucial for the future of U.S.-China relations [13]

Group 1 - The European Union (EU) is criticizing China for "overcapacity" in industries like new energy and steel while simultaneously demanding that China lift export restrictions on rare earth minerals, highlighting a double standard in their approach [3][8][9] - China holds approximately 87% of the world's rare earth resources, which are essential for various high-tech applications, indicating a significant leverage in global supply chains [5][6] - China's response to the EU's demands emphasizes the importance of regulating rare earth exports to protect national resources, asserting that market demand will dictate production capacity rather than external pressures [9][10] Group 2 - In 2022, China's exports of new energy vehicles to the EU increased by 35%, suggesting that European consumers prefer Chinese products despite claims of overcapacity [8] - The EU's request for China to take on "great power responsibility" for global supply chain stability is seen as hypocritical, given past instances where the EU did not advocate for such responsibilities when benefiting from cheap Chinese rare earths [3][6] - The current situation reflects a shift in power dynamics, with China now in a position to negotiate from strength regarding its rare earth resources, contrasting with previous times when it faced technology restrictions from the EU [10]