Core Viewpoint - The Danyang Emergency Management Bureau is leading business development through party building, implementing various actions to ensure safety production stability and support high-quality development in Danyang City [1] Group 1: Key Actions and Initiatives - The Danyang Emergency Management Bureau focuses on key areas such as production safety, fire safety, and traffic safety as part of the "100-day attack" initiative, enhancing the organizational and adaptive capabilities of party members [2] - A list of 334 key issues was developed to guide enterprises in self-inspection and regulatory checks, effectively promoting a shift towards proactive safety governance [2] - The bureau organized safety training sessions for key enterprise leaders and distributed over 20,000 safety production guidelines to ensure safe resumption of work after the Spring Festival [3] Group 2: Community Engagement and Public Awareness - The Danyang Emergency Management Bureau conducted safety inspections during the Spring Festival, helping enterprises eliminate hazards and strengthen safety defenses [3] - A campus earthquake evacuation drill was organized, and safety awareness activities were held, distributing over 1,000 promotional materials and engaging with over 300 citizens [3] Group 3: Performance and Results - The bureau's "100-day attack" initiative led to the identification of 413 major safety hazards, with a rectification rate of 96.6%, significantly improving risk identification and emergency response capabilities [4] - Four specialized party members were assigned to key positions to enhance their practical experience in addressing industry challenges [4]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released a batch of six typical cases related to dangerous operations to enhance business guidance on criminal cases that endanger production safety [1][3] - The cases cover three types of violations of safety management regulations as stipulated in Article 134 of the Criminal Law, spanning four high-risk industry sectors: offshore operations, metal smelting, light industry manufacturing, and the management, storage, and transportation of hazardous chemicals [1][2] - These typical cases aim to refine the standards for determining the reality, urgency, and severity of dangers, accurately identifying "real dangers" while showcasing good practices by procuratorial agencies in handling such cases [1][3] Group 2 - In the case of Zhao and Zhang, the procuratorial agency conducted a substantive review of the "real danger" assessment provided by emergency management departments, determining that the defendants' actions created a general reality of danger due to the use of non-compliant equipment and illegal storage and transportation of diesel [2] - The case of Wang involved on-site inspections and expert consultations to assess the likelihood of explosions due to improper storage of liquefied gas, leading to the recognition of a causal relationship between the illegal actions and the real danger [2] - The head of the Major Crime Procuratorial Department emphasized that these cases serve as a model for unifying judicial standards and accurately combating crimes in related fields, with plans to intensify efforts against criminal activities that endanger production safety [3]