21世纪经济报道新质生产力研究院综合报道 早上好，新的一天又开始了。在过去的24小时内，科技行业发生了哪些有意思的事情？来跟21tech一起 看看吧。 在开源鸿蒙技术大会上，开源鸿蒙6.0版本正式发布，可支持手机、平板、电脑等终端设备。 目前，开 源鸿蒙已汇聚9200多名社区贡献者，累计贡献1.3亿多行代码，推出70多个行业发行版，应用于金融、 交通、教育、能源等关键行业。同时，大会计划孵化开源鸿蒙跨平台框架PMC（项目管理委员会）及 具身智能PMC。据悉，具身智能PMC采用模型原生操作系统设计方法，完成首套开源鸿蒙与昇腾算力 赋能的全尺寸类人型机器人。 苹果公开反对欧盟《数字市场法案》 据央视新闻，针对近日美国苹果公司提出废除欧盟科技监管法规《数字市场法案》的要求，欧盟委员会 发言人雷尼耶作出强硬回应。他表示，自《数字市场法案》生效以来，苹果公司就对该法案提出各种质 疑，并且拒绝了欧盟委员会为帮助其遵守法案而进行的积极谈判。雷尼耶称，另一项针对苹果公司的调 查仍在进行，"所有选项都摆在桌面上"。苹果公司此前曾因违反《数字市场法案》相关条款，被处以5 亿欧元的罚款。苹果公司发表声明，要求欧盟废除《数字市场法案 ...

来源：环球网 外媒指出，《数字市场法案》作为欧盟的一项重要法律，旨在规范苹果等科技巨头的运营行为，防止其 不公平地偏袒自身服务、封锁竞争对手以及限制用户选择。然而，自该法案实施以来，苹果公司便几乎 对其每一条规定都提出了异议。 法国24小时新闻电视台报道，欧盟数字事务发言人托马斯·雷尼耶在一份声明中表示，欧盟委员会对苹 果公司的申诉并不感到意外，并且"绝对没有"废除《数字市场法案》的打算。他强调，如何执行该法案 以及由谁来执行，将由欧盟委员会决定。 苹果公司则坚称，《数字市场法案》的规则使欧盟iPhone用户面临恶意软件、欺诈和隐私侵犯的风险。 该公司还表示，该法案迫使其推迟了实时翻译、iPhone镜像功能以及地图应用中的"常去地点"和"偏好 路线"等关键功能的推出。 然而，雷尼耶对此并不认同。他指出："《数字市场法案》中没有任何条款要求公司降低其隐私标准或 安全标准。"（旺旺） 【环球网科技综合报道】近日，科技巨头苹果公司与欧盟之间的"法律博弈"再度升级。9月26日，据 macrumors报道，尽管苹果公司强烈抱怨欧盟的《数字市场法案》（DMA）给欧洲iPhone用户带来了更 糟糕的体验，但欧盟委员会却明确 ...

苹果公司此前曾因违反《数字市场法案》相关条款，被处以5亿欧元的罚款。24日，苹果公司发表声 明，要求欧盟废除《数字市场法案》，并应该实施"更切合目的的立法"。 据央视新闻，针对近日美国苹果公司提出废除欧盟科技监管法规《数字市场法案》的要求，欧盟委员会 发言人雷尼耶25日作出强硬回应。他表示，自《数字市场法案》生效以来，苹果公司就对该法案提出各 种质疑，并且拒绝了欧盟委员会为帮助其遵守法案而进行的积极谈判。雷尼耶称，另一项针对苹果公司 的调查仍在进行，"所有选项都摆在桌面上"。 ...

苹果公司此前曾因违反《数字市场法案》相关条款，被处以5亿欧元的罚款。24日，苹果公司发表声 明，要求欧盟废除《数字市场法案》，并应该实施"更切合目的的立法"。 据央视新闻，针对近日美国苹果公司提出废除欧盟科技监管法规《数字市场法案》的要求，欧盟委员会 发言人雷尼耶25日作出强硬回应。他表示， 自《数字市场法案》生效以来，苹果公司就对该法案提出 各种质疑，并且拒绝了欧盟委员会为帮助其遵守法案而进行的积极谈判。 雷尼耶称，另一项针对苹果 公司的调查仍在进行，"所有选项都摆在桌面上"。 ...

Group 1 - Apple has made significant adjustments to its App Store rules and commission agreements in the EU, which are expected to receive approval from EU antitrust regulators soon [1] - The new tiered fee structure includes a 20% processing fee for transactions through the App Store, down from the previous 15%-30% standard rates [3] - Developers under the "Small Business Program" with annual revenues below $1 million can benefit from a reduced fee of 13%, continuing Apple's support for small developers since 2021 [3] Group 2 - Developers directing users to complete payments outside the App Store will only need to pay a fee of 5%-15%, with no restrictions on the number of external links [3] - In April, the EU Commission fined Apple €500 million for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and required the removal of restrictions on external payments within 60 days [3] - To avoid further penalties, Apple introduced a "Core Technology Commission" (CTC) mechanism, charging an additional 5% on digital transactions outside the App Store [4] Group 3 - The new fee structure has sparked controversy, with Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney criticizing it as a "tax on competition," while EU regulators are set to further assess compliance [4] - The EU Commission is expected to complete its evaluation by mid-August [4]

Core Viewpoint - Apple is appealing a €500 million fine imposed by the European Commission, claiming the penalty and required business adjustments are unprecedented and illegal, exceeding legal requirements [1] Group 1: Legal Conflict - The core of the legal conflict revolves around the European Commission's enforcement action against Apple under the Digital Markets Act, accusing Apple of unfair competition by restricting developers from offering better payment options outside its App Store [2] - Apple firmly rebuts the Commission's decision, stating it exceeds legal boundaries and imposes chaotic and unfavorable commercial terms on developers and users [2] Group 2: Business Model Adjustments - In response to regulatory pressure, Apple introduced a new tiered commission structure in June, requiring developers to pay a commission of 5% or 13%, plus a 2% user acquisition fee, depending on their app's visibility in the App Store [2] - Apple argues that this new fee structure was implemented under regulatory demands and highlights that no other app download store is subject to such a structure [2] Group 3: Global Regulatory Pressure - The dispute with the EU is part of a broader trend of regulatory scrutiny faced by Apple globally, with its App Store business model under examination by lawmakers and judicial bodies worldwide [3] - A recent ruling in California mandates Apple to allow developers to direct users to complete in-app purchases on the web, potentially costing Apple billions annually [3] - The European regulatory landscape has seen significant fines against tech giants, including over $8 billion against Alphabet's Google and a previous order for Apple to repay €13 billion in taxes to Ireland, indicating a challenging legal environment for Apple in Europe [3]

Group 1 - The European Union (EU) spokesperson stated that the EU Digital Services Act is not on the trade negotiation table with the United States [1] - Additionally, the EU is not negotiating the Digital Markets Act [1]

Group 1 - Apple is in urgent negotiations with the European Commission to modify App Store rules to avoid upcoming fines [1][2] - The European regulators imposed a €500 million fine on Apple and require rule modifications within two months, with potential daily fines of up to 5% of global revenue if compliance is not met by the deadline [1][2] - Apple is expected to make concessions regarding its "guidance" clause, which previously restricted users from accessing discount information outside the App Store [1][2] Group 2 - Discussions also involve Apple's "core technology fee," which charges developers for installations after reaching 1 million downloads, under review by the EU since June of the previous year [2] - The timing of these negotiations coincides with U.S. President Trump's visit to Europe and ongoing trade agreement discussions between Brussels and Washington [2] - The European Commission is also evaluating Meta's adjustments to its personalized advertising model in relation to the new Digital Markets Act fines [2]

Core Points - The European Union (EU) is intensifying scrutiny on US tech giants, with Alphabet and X potentially facing fines following penalties imposed on Apple and Meta for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA) [1][3] - The EU's actions are seen as a response to US tariffs and are likely to target politically sensitive companies in the digital services sector [1][3] - The fines against Apple (500 million euros) and Meta (200 million euros) are viewed as a form of economic coercion by the US, with implications for transatlantic trade relations [3][4] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The EU has fined Apple and Meta a total of 700 million euros for anti-competitive practices, with Apple penalized for its app store rules and Meta for its advertising model [4][5] - The EU's Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act impose strict regulations on tech giants, which have led to significant fines and operational adjustments for these companies [3][4] - The EU is preparing to implement a General AI Business Code, which could impose fines of up to 7% of a company's annual revenue for violations [6] Group 2: US Response - The US government, under the Trump administration, has criticized the EU's regulatory framework as a form of taxation and a barrier to trade [3][4] - There is a growing concern among US officials that EU regulations are stifling innovation and unfairly targeting American companies [4][5] - The US is pressuring the EU to reconsider its regulatory approach, particularly regarding the upcoming AI regulations [6]

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission has fined Apple and a metaverse platform company for violating the Digital Markets Act, with penalties of €500 million and €200 million respectively [1][2]. Group 1: Apple - Apple was found to restrict app developers from directing users to third-party channels in its app store, depriving users of access to alternative services [1]. - The company failed to justify the necessity of these restrictions, and the EU has mandated the immediate removal of such limitations [1]. - If Apple does not comply within 60 days, it may face further fines [2]. Group 2: Metaverse Platform Company - The metaverse platform company introduced a "consent or pay" model in 2023, requiring users of Facebook and Instagram to either consent to data integration for personalized ads or pay a monthly fee for an ad-free experience [1]. - This model was deemed non-compliant with legal requirements by the EU, leading to the imposed fine [1]. - Similar to Apple, the company faces potential additional penalties if it does not rectify the situation within 60 days [2].