Workflow
无聊
icon
Search documents
聊聊无聊
Hu Xiu· 2025-06-26 11:19
Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of boredom, defining it as a "desire for desires" and exploring its psychological implications [2][4][6] - It highlights the historical context of boredom, linking it to modernity and capitalism, where leisure time has increased but meaningful engagement has decreased [4][10][24] - The article references various studies and theories on boredom, including its potential to stimulate creativity, although it questions the validity of such claims [21][22][24] Group 2 - The impact of boredom on social behavior is examined, suggesting it can lead to increased group identity and biases against others [23] - The article notes that boredom is often perceived negatively, with societal pressures leading individuals to deny their feelings of boredom [10][14] - It discusses the role of technology in exacerbating feelings of boredom by fragmenting attention and reducing the ability to engage deeply with tasks [24][25]
如何应对无聊,是后稀缺时代的最大挑战
腾讯研究院· 2025-05-14 08:35
Core Viewpoint - The book "Deep Utopia: Life and Meaning in a Solved World" by Nick Bostrom explores the potential for an ideal society in the context of rapid technological advancement, questioning how such a society could be achieved and what it would mean for humanity [3][4][14]. Summary by Sections Author Background - Nick Bostrom, born in 1973 in Sweden, has a diverse academic background including degrees in philosophy, physics, and computational neuroscience, and has focused on existential risks and the future of humanity [1][2]. Concept of Negative Entropy - Bostrom's engagement with "Extropianism" suggests that technology could eventually allow for infinite human life, leading to significant political and economic changes [2]. Shift in Focus - Unlike his previous work on the dangers of superintelligent AI, "Deep Utopia" revives discussions on ideal societies, drawing from historical philosophical traditions [3][4]. Technological Progress and Society - Bostrom acknowledges that technological advancements do not guarantee a better society, citing historical examples where progress led to increased oppression [3][4]. Imagining a Solved World - The book hypothesizes a world where technological issues are resolved, exploring the implications and desirability of such a scenario [4][5]. Structure of the Book - The narrative is structured around a series of lectures by Bostrom, interspersed with discussions from his audience and fictional correspondence, creating a philosophical dialogue [5][13]. Key Themes Discussed 1. The source of progress in a society with surplus wealth [5]. 2. The balance between leisure and productivity in a future society [5]. 3. The significance of meaningful living [5]. 4. Addressing boredom in a leisure-rich society [5]. Paradox of Equality and Progress - Bostrom identifies a paradox where a society that achieves equality may lose the motivation for progress, leading to a potential decline in innovation [6][7]. New Forms of Consumption - He proposes three potential new consumption forms to stimulate progress: 1. New products unaffected by diminishing returns [8]. 2. Public projects that absorb social capital [8]. 3. Status competition in an equal society [8]. Addressing Deep Redundancy - Bostrom outlines five mechanisms to counteract the loss of purpose in a post-work society, including pleasure, quality of experience, self-justifying activities, artificial purposes, and cultural engagement [9][10][11]. The Challenge of Boredom - The book emphasizes the need to create engaging experiences to combat boredom, which is seen as a significant challenge in a post-scarcity society [11][12]. Philosophical Implications - The discussions in the book reflect on the nature of happiness and fulfillment, suggesting that true enjoyment comes from deeper engagement with experiences [12][14]. Conclusion - Bostrom's work serves as a reflection on the potential paths humanity may take in the face of technological advancement, emphasizing the importance of choice and the ongoing nature of these discussions [14][15].