Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the legacy of the hero Bu Fenggang, emphasizing his "Five No's" motto that reflects integrity, discipline, and dedication to the people, serving as a guiding principle for current and future leaders [1][10][15]. Group 1: Bu Fenggang's Legacy - Bu Fenggang, known as the "Lone Hero," captured 124 enemies at the age of 18 during the Battle of Tower Mountain and was awarded the "Mao Zedong Medal" for his bravery [3][11]. - His "Five No's" motto includes principles such as not yielding to personal interests, maintaining integrity in the face of power, and prioritizing the welfare of the people [4][6][14]. - Bu Fenggang's life choices and actions serve as a model for current military personnel, emphasizing the importance of selflessness and dedication to the party and the people [12][15]. Group 2: Influence on Current Practices - The military unit where Bu Fenggang worked continues to uphold his principles, with current leaders establishing similar rules to maintain integrity and accountability [6][10]. - New recruits are educated on the importance of Bu Fenggang's legacy, reinforcing the idea that leadership should focus on serving the people rather than personal gain [4][10]. - The story of Bu Fenggang inspires current military personnel to emulate his selfless actions, fostering a culture of dedication and service within the ranks [14][15].

君子之心，常怀敬畏。习近平总书记强调，"讲规矩、守底线，首先要有敬畏心。心有所畏，方能言有 所戒、行有所止。干部一定要知敬畏、存戒惧、守底线，敬畏党、敬畏人民、敬畏法纪。"党员干部常 怀敬畏之心，必须摆正个人与组织、与人民、与法纪的关系，做到对党忠诚、听党指挥，为人民掌好权 用好权，守住廉洁从政的底线，在"有畏"之中体现"有为"，将党和人民的事业不断推向前进。 干部成长，必须依靠组织、敬畏组织。党的干部是党的事业的骨干，成长发展固然要靠自身努力，但更 离不开组织的培养呵护，想明白这点就会更加自觉依靠组织、敬畏组织。有的干部习惯将成绩归功于自 身素质出众、能力突出，而忽视组织的栽培和各方面支持；还有的在党内大搞结党营私、培植个人势力 等非组织活动，全然不把组织放在眼里。这些人忘记了，机会和平台都是组织提供的，成绩是干部群众 共同奋斗的，某个人或是小团体的力量再大，也不可能凌驾于组织之上。况且，为党奋斗是党员干部的 本职本分，在组织面前没有讨价还价的资格，也不允许有不受约束的特殊党员。敬畏组织才是正途，要 始终忠于党、忠于党的事业，坚决听党话、跟党走，不断增强为党分忧、为党尽责、为党奉献的政治担 当，让自己所作所 ...

Group 1 - The concept of "respect" and "fear" is essential for maintaining discipline and integrity within organizations, emphasizing the need for a balance between internal respect and external constraints [1][2] - The lack of "fear" among individuals in power can lead to corruption and misconduct, as they may disregard the consequences of their actions [1][2] - Historical and cultural preservation is highlighted as an area where respect and fear should guide decision-making, avoiding reckless actions that could harm cultural heritage [2] Group 2 - The importance of adhering to market rules and natural laws is emphasized, suggesting that a lack of respect for these principles can lead to detrimental outcomes for industries [2] - Organizations should cultivate a mindset of caution and awareness, recognizing the significance of their actions and the potential impact on society and the environment [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining a clear mind among party leaders to avoid being misled by flattery and to ensure they listen to the genuine voices of the people [1][2][3]. Group 1 - Party leaders must avoid the "killing by flattery" phenomenon, which can lead to a distorted view of power and performance, prioritizing superficial achievements over substantial ones [2][3]. - There is a need for party leaders to recognize the difference between sincere advice and insincere praise, fostering an environment where honest feedback is welcomed [3][4]. - The article highlights the detrimental effects of flattery on political ecology, urging leaders to strengthen their party spirit and maintain a humble approach towards the public [4][5]. Group 2 - The article calls for a commitment to the principles established by the Central Eight Regulations, emphasizing the need for a long-term adherence to strict measures and a clean political atmosphere [1][4]. - It stresses the importance of cultivating a political environment that discourages sycophancy and encourages genuine communication between leaders and the public [5].

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the detrimental impact of "performance projects" initiated by local officials, which prioritize personal gain over genuine community development [2][3] - The case of Du Yibao, a former village official, illustrates the consequences of such misguided initiatives, resulting in significant financial losses for the community [1] - The distinction between genuine achievements and "performance projects" is emphasized, with the latter often leading to wasteful spending and corruption [2][3] Group 2 - "Performance projects" not only divert funds from essential economic development and public welfare but also exacerbate the financial burden on citizens [3] - The prevalence of "performance projects" is linked to the abuse of power and corruption among officials, as seen in the case of Du Yibao, who faced multiple disciplinary issues [3] - True performance should be measured by the tangible benefits provided to the community, rather than superficial projects aimed at personal advancement [3]

Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the dual nature of power, which can be both a tool for achievement and a source of downfall, depending on how it is used [1][2] - The historical analysis of corruption indicates that bribery tends to follow power, suggesting that individuals in positions of authority are at risk of moral decline [1][2] - The importance of maintaining a public-oriented perspective on power is highlighted, with a call for officials to remember that their authority is granted by the party and the people for the purpose of serving them [1][2] Group 2 - The narrative includes examples of parental guidance that stress the importance of integrity and the dangers of taking advantage of public resources, illustrating the foundational values of the Communist Party [2][3] - A call for cultivating a sense of respect for power and the people is made, emphasizing that true public servants must prioritize the interests of the populace over personal gain [2][3] - The necessity of adhering to party discipline as a safeguard against corruption is discussed, advocating for a structured approach to power that includes legal and ethical boundaries [2][3]