5月16-18日，以"智启中国知产新纪元，开创全球汽车新格局"为主题的2025中国汽车知识产权年会在湖北武汉召开。本届 年会由中国汽车知识产权运用促进中心主办，中汽信科、东风汽车集团有限公司（以下简称"东风公司"）研发总院承办，中汽 知识产权（广州）有限公司、中汽中心华中分中心协办。来自政府部门、行业机构及企业的400余名嘉宾参加大会。 要营造良好的汽车产业创新生态环境 中汽中心党委委员、副总经理李洧表示，中汽中心作为国资央企，始终立足产业需求、服务国家战略，在知识产权领域充分发 挥"创新引擎"和"行业智库"的双重作用。中汽中心将持续深化知识产权战略研究，聚焦知识产权国际交流与合作，不断推动汽车产业 高质量发展。东风公司党委常委、副总经理尤峥指出，东风公司始终坚定不移地推进高水平科技自立自强，聚力构建全链路研发体 系，与行业伙伴携手共进。 国家知识产权局知识产权保护司副司长宋蓓蓓强调，中国汽车企业要积极参与国际知识产权规则的制定与交流，构建更加完善的 知识产权保护体系，营造良好的汽车产业创新生态环境。 中国工程院院士谭建荣则提出，技术、管理、质量和市场是推动自主品牌发展的关键要素。新一代信息技术的发展，为自主 ...

Core Viewpoint - The licensing rules and dispute governance of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) are a focal point in the global intellectual property landscape, impacting innovation and the collaborative development of global industrial chains [1] Group 1: Regulatory Trends - The National Market Regulatory Administration of China issued the "Antitrust Guidelines for Standard Essential Patents" in November 2024, reflecting a policy direction that balances innovation encouragement and anti-monopoly measures [1] - Global SEP licensing regulatory policies are showing differentiated trends, providing valuable experiences for optimizing China's SEP governance system [1][2] - Experts believe that SEP policies will become more complex and competitive, with regulatory tools becoming more refined, focusing on licensing fee calculations, necessity reviews, and transparency [2] Group 2: Impact on Innovation - The SEP regulatory policy changes in major countries have varied, with the EU attempting to establish a governance framework but ultimately retracting due to disputes, while the US remains in a state of flux [3] - The relationship between SEP regulation and innovation is complex, with empirical data insufficient to determine whether regulation promotes or suppresses innovation [3] - Strong regulation and excessive intervention in the SEP licensing market could undermine innovation incentives, emphasizing the need for honest negotiations and a focus on protecting rights and promoting innovation [3][5] Group 3: Judicial and Market Dynamics - China has become a preferred venue for SEP litigation, with many cases settling but a lack of impactful rulings, indicating a need for improved litigation efficiency and mechanisms [6] - Different judicial regions are competing for SEP litigation, with the UK and Germany adopting contrasting approaches that reflect their respective stances towards rights holders and implementers [6] - The complexity of SEP disputes necessitates a comprehensive rule system that addresses all stages of the SEP lifecycle, from research and development to dispute resolution [11] Group 4: Industry Perspectives - The relationship between SEP governance and market dynamics is critical, with a need for a balanced approach that respects both rights holders and implementers [12] - The role of innovation in SEP governance is emphasized, with the need for policies that support technological advancement while avoiding excessive reliance on legal or regulatory measures [5][9] - The importance of market-driven solutions for SEP disputes is highlighted, advocating for flexible tools like mediation and industry associations to resolve conflicts [12]