此前有报道称，2025年12月，原名"贝拉1"号的油轮成功阻止了美方人员登船企图并驶入大西洋。这艘 油轮上的船员在船身涂上俄罗斯国旗图案。近日，"贝拉1"号以新名称"水手"号出现在俄罗斯官方船舶 登记册上。 责任编辑：刘础琪 据塔斯社7日报道，有关美军声称扣押两艘油轮，联合国秘书长发言人迪雅里克作出回应。 根据联合国网站7日发布的消息，迪雅里克在记者会上称，"我们当然注意到了有关情况。目前，我们没 有掌握充足信息来发表更多评论"。"我们此前已就此问题表明立场：所有海洋上执法行动都应根据适用 的国际法进行，以确保公海的海上安全。我们希望避免事态进一步升级。"迪雅里克补充称。 当地时间7日，美国欧洲司令部在社交媒体上发布消息称，在北大西洋扣押了"贝拉1"号油轮。约半小时 后，美国南方司令部在社交媒体上发布消息称，在国际水域扣押一艘无国籍油轮。对于美国扣押"贝拉 1"号油轮，俄罗斯交通部7日称，任何国家均无权对在其他国家管辖范围内的船舶使用武力。 ...

Group 1 - The United Nations spokesperson, Dujarric, responded to the U.S. military's claim of seizing two oil tankers, stating that they do not have sufficient information to comment further and emphasized that all maritime enforcement actions should comply with international law to ensure maritime safety [5][6]. - The U.S. European Command announced the seizure of the oil tanker "Bella 1" in the North Atlantic, followed by the Southern Command's report of another stateless tanker being seized in international waters [6]. - The Russian Ministry of Transport asserted that no country has the right to use force against vessels under the jurisdiction of other nations, in response to the seizure of the "Bella 1" tanker, which had previously evaded U.S. personnel attempts to board it [6].

当地时间7日，美国欧洲司令部在社交媒体上发布消息称，在北大西洋扣押了"贝拉1"号油轮。约半小时 后，美国南方司令部在社交媒体上发布消息称，在国际水域扣押一艘无国籍油轮。对于美国扣押"贝拉 1"号油轮，俄罗斯交通部7日称，任何国家均无权对在其他国家管辖范围内的船舶使用武力。 此前有报道称，2025年12月，原名"贝拉1"号的油轮成功阻止了美方人员登船企图并驶入大西洋。这艘 油轮上的船员在船身涂上俄罗斯国旗图案。近日，"贝拉1"号以新名称"水手"号出现在俄罗斯官方船舶 登记册上。 根据联合国网站7日发布的消息，迪雅里克在记者会上称，"我们当然注意到了有关情况。目前，我们没 有掌握充足信息来发表更多评论"。"我们此前已就此问题表明立场：所有海洋上执法行动都应根据适用 的国际法进行，以确保公海的海上安全。我们希望避免事态进一步升级。"迪雅里克补充称。 【环球网报道 记者 张江平】据塔斯社7日报道，有关美军声称扣押两艘油轮，联合国秘书长发言人迪雅 里克作出回应。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Fujian Provincial Marine and Fishery Law Enforcement Team has initiated a joint enforcement action named "Blue Sword 2025-24 (178th)" to ensure maritime safety during the Mid-Autumn and National Day holidays, aiming to protect fishermen and maintain stable fishery production [1] Group 1: Enforcement Actions - The special enforcement team conducted operations from September 28 to 30, focusing on key maritime safety areas before the holidays [1] - A total of 15 illegal fishing vessels were guided away to effectively regulate navigation order in high-accident areas and busy fishing zones [1] - Three unregistered vessels and one registered vessel violating regulations were seized in the coastal areas of Taitou and Huangqi [1] Group 2: Technology and Efficiency - The enforcement actions also included inspections of marine projects, uninhabited islands, and ocean observation stations, utilizing technology to enhance enforcement efficiency [1] Group 3: Symbolic Actions - On October 1, the "China Marine Monitoring 8001" vessel held a flag-raising ceremony at sea, reinforcing the commitment to safeguarding the marine territory [1] - Following the ceremony, the enforcement vessel immediately proceeded to patrol the designated areas, emphasizing continuous enforcement during the holiday period [1]

Core Viewpoint - The joint underwater patrol conducted by the Russian and Chinese navies in the Pacific signifies a strategic deterrent capability and reflects high levels of military trust between the two nations [1][2]. Group 1: Joint Patrol Details - The underwater patrol began in early August following the "Maritime Joint-2025" exercises, involving the Russian submarine "Volkhov" and Chinese submarines along pre-agreed routes in the Sea of Japan and East China Sea [1]. - The "Maritime Joint-2025" exercises took place from August 1 to 5 near Vladivostok, Russia, involving multiple naval vessels and aircraft from both countries [1]. - After completing the joint patrol, all participating submarines returned to their respective bases [1]. Group 2: Strategic Implications - The joint submarine patrol enhances the operational capabilities of both navies in underwater warfare, improving their search, reconnaissance, and attack abilities [2]. - The covert nature of submarine operations serves as a significant deterrent against potential adversaries, contributing to regional peace and stability [2]. - This new form of joint patrol represents an evolution in naval cooperation between Russia and China, following previous surface vessel patrols [2].

Core Viewpoint - The United States and China are engaged in a dispute over the influence of China in the Panama Canal, with the U.S. claiming it poses a threat to international trade and global security, while China refutes these claims as baseless attacks [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Position - The U.S. has intensified pressure on the Panamanian government regarding China's influence over the Panama Canal since Trump's return to the White House [3]. - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio demanded that Panama "immediately change" its relationship with China concerning the canal during a visit in February [3]. - The U.S. has plans to acquire significant shares of the Panama Canal port operations through a consortium led by BlackRock [3]. Group 2: China's Response - China firmly opposes U.S. accusations, asserting that the Panama Canal is fully operated by Panamanians and that there is no increasing Chinese control [3][4]. - China's permanent representative to the UN emphasized respect for Panama's sovereignty over the canal and criticized U.S. unilateralism and hegemonic behavior as escalating global maritime security risks [4]. - China has called for the U.S. to reflect on its responsibilities as a major power and cease its fabrications regarding the Panama Canal [4]. Group 3: Maritime Security Concerns - The UN Security Council meeting highlighted multiple maritime security threats, including piracy, armed robbery, transnational crime, and increasing cyber-attack risks [1]. - The Secretary-General of Interpol warned that criminals might exploit artificial intelligence to target ports with the weakest cybersecurity, posing significant challenges to global port operations and shipping safety [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the UN, Fu Cong, refuted U.S. accusations regarding the Panama Canal, asserting that China respects Panama's sovereignty and the canal's status as a neutral international waterway [1] Group 1: U.S. Accusations and China's Response - The U.S. has repeatedly made unfounded accusations against China in various UN Security Council discussions, which China firmly opposes [1] - China emphasizes its respect for Panama's sovereignty over the canal and criticizes the U.S. for fabricating lies to justify its control over the Panama Canal [1] Group 2: U.S. Actions in the South China Sea - Fu Cong labeled the U.S. as the biggest disruptor of peace and stability in the South China Sea, citing the deployment of offensive weapons and military reconnaissance activities by the U.S. in the region [1] - The U.S. aims to create chaos in the South China Sea to serve its geopolitical interests, according to Fu Cong [1] Group 3: Global Maritime Security Risks - The U.S. is accused of exacerbating global maritime security risks through its hegemonic behavior, Cold War mentality, and unilateral actions [1] - The U.S. has not joined the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and disregards international law, which undermines global maritime governance [1] - The U.S. is also criticized for threatening the normal operations of key maritime routes like the Panama and Suez Canals, challenging the sovereignty of other nations [1]

Group 1 - The joint naval exercise hosted by Iran will take place in the Caspian Sea starting on the 21st of this month, lasting for three days [1] - The theme of the exercise is "Together Building a Safe Caspian Sea," emphasizing cooperation among Caspian Sea coastal nations [1] - Observers from Russia and other Caspian Sea bordering countries will participate in the exercise, aimed at enhancing maritime security and naval interaction [1]

Group 1 - The UK and EU reached a new defense and security agreement, marking a significant step in rebuilding relations post-Brexit [1] - The agreement extends EU fishing rights in UK waters for 12 years until 2038, reflecting a major concession from the UK under French lobbying [1] - The defense aspect of the agreement opens the door for UK participation in EU joint procurement programs, which is appealing to the UK's lucrative defense industry [1] Group 2 - The agreement establishes cooperation in areas such as hybrid warfare, cybersecurity, infrastructure resilience, and maritime security [1] - The UK is set to explore rejoining the EU's single electricity market and aligning with EU regulations, which may provoke backlash from Brexit skeptics in London [2] - The agreement aims to streamline trade by reducing bureaucratic procedures for the movement of goods, particularly in the context of sanitary and phytosanitary rules [2] Group 3 - The agreement includes a dispute resolution mechanism that grants the EU Court final authority on all EU legal matters, potentially causing discontent among hardline Brexit supporters and within the Labour Party [3]

Core Viewpoint - A Panama-flagged oil tanker, linked to the UAE, was reportedly intercepted approximately 51 nautical miles northwest of Bandar Jask port in Iran, with emergency signals indicating that the vessel was "hijacked" [1] Group 1 - The incident involves a tanker associated with the UAE, highlighting potential geopolitical tensions in the region [1] - The location of the interception, near Bandar Jask port, is significant as it is a strategic area for maritime activities [1] - The use of the term "hijacked" raises concerns about maritime security and the safety of shipping routes in the area [1]