Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Administrative Law Enforcement Coordination and Supervision Bureau in Linyi City aims to enhance the coordination and supervision of administrative law enforcement, ensuring it is more strict, standardized, fair, and civilized [1][3]. Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement System - Linyi City has focused on improving the quality of administrative law enforcement and standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement, completing a pilot for a four-level administrative law enforcement coordination and supervision system [2]. - The city has established "Administrative Law Enforcement Coordination and Supervision Offices" in all 156 town (street) judicial offices, detailing 99 responsibilities across city, county, and township levels [2]. - A new regulatory framework has been introduced, including the "Linyi City Enterprise Classification and Regulation Method (Trial)," which aims to create a classification standard system for enterprise regulation based on industry characteristics [2]. Group 2: Supervision and Inspection Mechanisms - Five major systems have been established to manage enterprise-related administrative inspections, ensuring that checks are only conducted according to set standards and plans [2]. - The government and discipline inspection commission have created a "dual special team" mechanism to address prominent issues in administrative law enforcement, resulting in the rectification of over 1,800 problems over four years [2]. - The "Joint Inspection Platform for Enterprises" has been developed, leading to a 35% year-on-year decrease in average monthly enterprise inspections in 2024 [2]. Group 3: Future Directions - The Linyi City Judicial Bureau plans to leverage the establishment of the new bureau to enhance its responsibilities and continue promoting strict, standardized, fair, and civilized law enforcement, providing strong legal support for high-quality economic and social development in the city [3].

Group 1 - The provincial Department of Culture and Tourism is collecting clues about prominent issues in administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to reduce the burden on businesses and optimize the legal business environment [1][2] - Key issues for collection include arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures, as well as illegal cross-regional enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement [1][2] - Specific problems under arbitrary charges and fines involve unauthorized fee items, failure to publicly disclose fees, and excessive fines beyond legal limits [1][2] Group 2 - Issues related to arbitrary inspections and seizures include unauthorized inspection entities, exceeding legal responsibilities, and illegal enforcement procedures [1][2] - The collection also targets issues such as corruption, non-action in law enforcement, and abuse of power for personal gain [2] - The deadline for submitting clues is August 31, 2025, and issues already under investigation or in legal proceedings are excluded from this collection [2]

Group 1 - The provincial government of Shaanxi is collecting clues regarding administrative law enforcement issues affecting enterprises until July 31, 2023 [1][2] - The focus areas for the collection include seven main issues: arbitrary charges, arbitrary fines, arbitrary inspections, arbitrary seizures, illegal cross-regional law enforcement, profit-driven law enforcement, and other related issues [1][2] - The collection aims to standardize administrative law enforcement behavior and reduce the burden on enterprises [1] Group 2 - Specific issues under arbitrary charges include unauthorized fee items, non-compliance with published fee standards, and forced acceptance of paid services [1][2] - Arbitrary fines encompass exceeding legal authority, arbitrary large penalties, and inconsistent application of penalties [1][2] - Arbitrary inspections involve inappropriate inspection subjects, excessive frequency of inspections, and illegal inspection procedures [1][2] Group 3 - Arbitrary seizures refer to the abuse of administrative coercive measures beyond legal limits [2] - Illegal cross-regional law enforcement includes conducting enforcement activities outside the legal jurisdiction and failing to follow cooperation procedures [2] - Profit-driven law enforcement involves setting arbitrary administrative fines and linking fine income to unit budgets and benefits [2] Group 4 - Other issues include corruption, coercion for financial gain, and favoritism in administrative actions [2] - Citizens and enterprises can report issues through various channels such as phone, email, or mail to the provincial and municipal administrative law enforcement coordination supervision bureaus [2][3]