Workflow
研发投入强度
icon
Search documents
赵尚志将军牺牲的确切时间确认【三分钟新闻早知道】
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-18 22:15
王小洪:17日出席全球公共安全合作论坛(连云港)2025年大会并致辞。王小洪表示,中方将在共建治理平台、贡献治理产品、提升治理能力、创新治理 行动、促进治理合作等五个方面采取切实行动,为共塑全球公共安全治理新格局贡献中国力量。(新华社) 硬新闻 每天3分钟,速览天下事 9月19日星期五,农历七月廿八 封面新闻 赵尚志将军牺牲的确切时间确认抚顺战犯管理所旧址陈列馆18日披露一份日本战犯笔供自述及庭审记录,确认了东北抗日联军的创建者和主要领导人之一 赵尚志将军牺牲的确切时间:1942年2月12日7时。这份亲笔供述来自日本战犯田井久二郎,其时任伪满洲国三江省鹤立县兴山警察署署长。(新华社) 政法要闻 1、深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教育中央指导组暨中央层面工作专班总结会议召开会议强调,要以打攻坚战、持久战的决心和恒心,锲而不舍落实中 央八项规定精神,推进作风建设常态化长效化。(央视新闻) 2、外交部:发言人18日回应《731》上映表示,相关题材影视作品,提醒世人以史为鉴,维护和平。中国是一个开放、包容、安全的国家,我们欢迎包括 日本在内的各国人士来华旅游、学习、经商和生活,将继续一视同仁,维护在华外国人的安全。(新 ...
中国终于暴露实力!中美差距究竟有多大?张召忠:我可以负责任讲,别再被误导了!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-22 12:07
Economic Milestone - China's GDP, including Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, has surpassed $20 trillion for the first time, reaching $20,196.39 billion [1] - Macau's economy has shown remarkable growth at 8.8%, leading among all provinces, while Taiwan's economy exceeded expectations with a growth rate of 4.59% [1] GDP Comparison with the US - In 2024, the US GDP is projected to be $29.21 trillion, while China's GDP (excluding Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) is estimated at $18.94 trillion, resulting in a gap of $10.26 trillion [1] - This gap is expected to widen to $11 trillion by 2025, influenced by statistical technical factors [1] Currency and Inflation Impact - The average exchange rate of the RMB against the USD depreciated from 7.12 to 7.18 in the first half of 2025, leading to a "loss" of $160 billion in China's GDP when measured in USD [3] - The inflation difference also plays a significant role, with the US experiencing a CPI of 3% in Q1 2025, inflating nominal GDP, while China's nominal growth was only 4.6% despite a real growth of 5.4% [3] Statistical Methodology Differences - The US employs an expenditure approach to GDP calculation, including credit consumption and government stimulus, which inflates the figures, while China uses a production approach focusing on actual goods and services produced [3] Innovation and Development - During the 14th Five-Year Plan, China has made significant innovations in various fields, including shipbuilding, aerospace, and nuclear power, showcasing its technological advancements [3] - R&D investment in China has increased by nearly 50% compared to the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan, with an intensity of 2.68%, approaching developed countries' levels [4] Economic Structure Differences - The US economy is heavily service-oriented, with services accounting for 80% of its GDP, while China's manufacturing sector constitutes 28% and is enhancing its global competitiveness, particularly in the electric vehicle sector [6] - China's per capita GDP remains over six times lower than that of the US, indicating different stages of economic development [6] Environmental and Market Developments - China has reduced its energy consumption per unit of GDP by 11.6% over four years, equivalent to a reduction of 1.1 billion tons of CO2 emissions [6] - The establishment of a unified national market has led to a growth of over 40% in private enterprises compared to the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan [6]
中国一年投入3.6万亿研发经费,都花在哪儿了?
虎嗅APP· 2025-03-08 13:42
Core Viewpoint - China's total R&D expenditure has surpassed 3 trillion yuan, indicating a strong commitment to innovation and technology development, with a target of maintaining an annual growth rate of over 7% during the 14th Five-Year Plan period [2][4]. Group 1: R&D Expenditure Overview - In 2022, China's total R&D expenditure reached approximately 3.08 trillion yuan, marking a 10.11% increase from the previous year, and in 2023, it is projected to grow to about 3.34 trillion yuan, reflecting an 8.36% increase [2][4]. - The R&D expenditure intensity in 2022 was 2.54%, an increase of 0.11 percentage points from the previous year, achieving the target set in the 13th Five-Year Plan [4][6]. - By 2023, the R&D expenditure intensity is expected to rise to 2.65%, and further to 2.68% in 2024, continuing the trend of steady growth [4][6]. Group 2: Comparison with G7 Countries - In terms of R&D expenditure scale, China's R&D investment in 2022 was equivalent to 49.57% of that of the United States, maintaining its position as the second-largest globally [5][6]. - China's R&D intensity remains in the middle range among G7 countries, with 2022 figures showing it lagging behind the U.S., Japan, and Germany [6]. Group 3: Regional Disparities in R&D Investment - The gap in R&D expenditure between southern and northern regions of China has widened, with southern regions accounting for 67.21% of national R&D spending by 2023 [8][11]. - The central region's share of R&D expenditure has increased from 17.75% in 2020 to 18.20% in 2023, indicating a notable rise in its contribution [11][12]. Group 4: Leading Provinces in R&D Investment - Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Beijing continue to lead in R&D expenditure, with Guangdong and Jiangsu both surpassing 400 billion yuan in 2023 [13][14]. - The number of provinces exceeding 100 billion yuan in R&D expenditure has increased from 8 to 12 between 2020 and 2023, highlighting the rise of central provinces like Henan, Hunan, Anhui, and Fujian [13][14]. Group 5: Role of Enterprises in R&D - The proportion of R&D funding from enterprises has increased significantly, rising from 31.71% in 1995 to 79.02% in 2022, indicating a shift towards enterprise-led innovation [15][18]. - The execution of R&D funding has also shifted towards enterprises, with their share rising to 77.57% in 2022, while the roles of research institutions and universities have diminished [18][21]. Group 6: Government Support and Research Focus - Government funding for research institutions has decreased, while support for higher education institutions has increased, reflecting a strategic shift in funding priorities [20][21]. - Enterprises are primarily focused on experimental development, with a significant portion of their R&D funding directed towards internal activities, while universities are enhancing their role in basic research [23][25]. Group 7: Future Directions - The emphasis for China's R&D funding should shift from merely increasing scale to optimizing internal structures, promoting regional cooperation, and enhancing the role of universities and research institutions in fundamental research [27].