Core Insights - The article highlights the successful harvesting of silage corn in Dongcheng Town, Muli County, which is crucial for ensuring livestock have enough feed for the winter [1] - The implementation of a "planting and breeding integration, agricultural and animal husbandry circular" green development model has been promoted in Dongcheng Town, leading to increased silage corn cultivation [1] Summary by Categories Agricultural Practices - Dongcheng Town is actively utilizing machinery and labor to efficiently harvest silage corn, ensuring timely collection for winter feed [1] - Farmers are encouraged to adopt a model that combines crop cultivation with livestock breeding, enhancing resource utilization [1] Economic Impact - A local farmer, Xu Xianwen, reported a yield from his 70 acres of corn, with part of the silage used for personal livestock and the remainder sold at a price of 0.45 yuan per kilogram, contributing to both self-sufficiency and economic gain [1] - The successful harvest of silage corn not only secures winter feed for livestock but also acts as a catalyst for rural revitalization [1] Nutritional Benefits - Fermented silage corn retains complete nutrition and is highly palatable, making it popular among livestock farmers [1] - The approach addresses traditional challenges in straw disposal while significantly enhancing breeding efficiency [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the effectiveness of the integrated crop-livestock model in promoting rural revitalization and achieving a sustainable agricultural system [1][2] - The implementation of integrated crop-livestock systems leads to significant economic benefits, with average production costs for pig and beef farming being lower by 1.22 yuan and 2.71 yuan per kilogram, respectively, compared to non-integrated systems [1] - The integrated model helps maintain profitability during market fluctuations, as seen in 2024 when integrated livestock farmers managed to sustain operations despite a drop in beef prices [1] Group 2 - The social effects of integrated farming are highlighted, as approximately 40% of farmers' income previously came from livestock, but the rise of large-scale farming has marginalized smallholders [2] - The trend of returning migrant workers to engage in moderate-scale farming is noted, contributing to stable family incomes and local employment opportunities [2] - The article stresses the need for strategic thinking on how to further promote integrated farming to achieve economic, environmental, and social benefits in the context of agricultural modernization and rural revitalization [2] Group 3 - Recommendations include national legislation to establish nutrient management standards and ensure that livestock farming aligns with local land capacity [3] - It suggests determining appropriate scale standards for different livestock types based on local conditions and farmer resources, with specific benchmarks provided for pig and cattle farming [3] - Support policies should focus on moderate-scale integrated farming standards and nutrient management thresholds, shifting from simple size-based criteria to more nuanced standards [3]

Core Insights - The integration of crop and livestock farming is proving to be an effective model for rural revitalization, demonstrating significant economic benefits and ecological advantages [1][2] Economic Benefits - Specialized pig farming operations that implement crop-livestock integration have an average production cost that is 1.22 yuan lower per kilogram compared to non-integrated operations. Similarly, integrated beef cattle operations have an average cost that is 2.71 yuan lower per kilogram [1] - During the downturn in beef prices in 2024, integrated farming households were able to sustain operations and later achieve profitability during the price recovery phase, offsetting previous losses [1] Environmental Advantages - The annual direct manure discharge from livestock farming exceeds 1.4 billion tons in China, leading to increased costs for manure management. Crop-livestock integration facilitates the resource utilization of manure, achieving both ecological and economic benefits [1] Social Impact - Approximately 40% of farmers' income historically came from livestock, but the rapid scale-up and specialization in livestock farming have squeezed out smallholders, making it difficult for them to participate in high-capital industries like pig and dairy farming [2] - The trend of returning migrant workers engaging in moderate-scale livestock farming is stabilizing family incomes and promoting local employment, which is crucial for rural revitalization [2] Policy Recommendations - National legislation is needed to establish nutrient management standards and to set stricter entry requirements for livestock farming, ensuring that livestock numbers are within the land's capacity to absorb waste [3] - Different livestock species should have tailored moderate-scale standards based on local conditions, ensuring that farming operations can sustain stable incomes [3] - Support policies should focus on moderate-scale crop-livestock integration standards and nutrient management thresholds, shifting from simple scale-based criteria to more nuanced standards [3]