Core Insights - The "2025 Court Informationization Blue Book" highlights the rapid advancement of online court services, with over 100 cases being registered every minute since 2024, indicating a significant shift towards digitalization in the judiciary [1][3] Group 1: Online Court Services - The "People's Court Online Service" mini-program has facilitated an average of over 100 cases being registered every minute since 2024 [1][3] - The Supreme People's Court has conducted online registration trials for civil and administrative appeals in 16 regions, resulting in over 370,000 online registrations by the end of 2024, with the registration cycle reduced by over 70% compared to pre-trial periods [3] - A total of 7,918 cross-regional litigation services were provided in 2024, allowing parties to handle litigation matters locally, thus reducing travel costs [3] Group 2: Dispute Resolution at the Grassroots Level - In 2024, grassroots courts implemented a mediation platform that successfully resolved 122,590 disputes through online connections with local community organizations [4] - The mediation success rate reached 95.57%, with grassroots units independently handling 56,800 disputes [4] Group 3: Blockchain Technology in Judiciary - The Supreme People's Court has established a unified judicial blockchain platform, enhancing data security and optimizing judicial processes, with over 5.8 billion data records stored on the blockchain by the end of 2024 [5] - The average delivery time for traditional methods was 0.8 days, while electronic delivery took only 0.5 days, resulting in a 93% reduction in postal costs [5] - The blockchain technology has streamlined traditional processes, reducing the time for certain procedures from multiple days to just 10 minutes [5] Group 4: Future Directions - The future focus of blockchain technology will include exploring innovations within the Web3.0 technology framework and enhancing integration with privacy computing and the Internet of Things [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for legal regulations to govern algorithm usage, highlighting the dual nature of algorithms as both beneficial and potentially harmful tools in digital life [1][2]. Group 1: Algorithm Issues - Algorithm recommendation technology has improved user experience but has also led to problems such as "information cocoon," "big data price discrimination," and "induced addiction" [1][2]. - The public sentiment reflects a desire for algorithms to not exploit users, encapsulated in the phrase "Don't let algorithms calculate against you" [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The National Internet Information Office launched a special action last year to address algorithm-related issues, focusing on problems like homogeneous content pushing and violations of user rights [2]. - The initiative includes nine batches of algorithm filing under the "Internet Information Service Deep Synthesis Management Regulations," promoting the standardized development of deep synthesis services [2]. Group 3: Future Expectations - The article concludes with a call for technology to serve humanity, expressing hope that algorithms will become helpful tools that enhance digital life [3].