Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the transformation of precise research and development capabilities from being exclusive to industry giants to becoming standard for all enterprises, particularly in the context of battery technology and electrolyte formulation [1]. Group 1: Research and Development Capabilities - The introduction of a closed-loop workflow that integrates formulation, design, and prediction processes to enhance battery performance and lifespan [9]. - The development of proprietary molecular mapping and computational tools to accelerate the research and development process [10]. Group 2: Performance Evaluation - The article discusses the design assessment of new additives and their impact on battery performance, highlighting the importance of precise frequency measurement in electrolyte formulation [6][8]. - It mentions the ability to predict battery performance and lifespan from molecular characteristics, thereby streamlining the R&D process [8]. Group 3: Technological Innovations - The use of advanced AI systems to search for and evaluate potential solutions for battery performance issues, enabling scientists to test formulations effectively [10]. - The integration of intelligent systems to facilitate the design and testing of electrolyte systems, enhancing the overall efficiency of the development process [10].

Core Insights - The article highlights the chaotic nature of R&D project initiation in many companies, likening it to "improvised creation" without systematic evaluation, leading to resource waste, market disconnection, and inventory backlog [1] Group 1: Issues in R&D Project Initiation - Many companies respond immediately to sales demands without thorough assessment, resulting in 80% of product costs being locked in during the design phase [1] - R&D teams often create products that do not meet real market needs, leading to excess features or "pseudo-needs" [1] - 80% of inventory issues stem from design decisions rather than production or supply chain problems [1] Group 2: Principles for Precise Project Initiation - R&D project initiation should focus on three core principles: necessity, feasibility, and universality to ensure products are both marketable and manufacturable [3] Group 3: Necessity in R&D - Companies should shift from a "technology-driven" mindset to a "market-driven" approach, assessing whether products address real pain points and if the market is willing to pay [4] - Market feasibility analysis should utilize tools like SWOT and user research to avoid "pseudo-innovation" [4] - Companies like Huawei and Honda require detailed project proposals to ensure clear commercial logic [4] Group 4: Feasibility in R&D - Companies must evaluate their technical, manufacturing, and resource capabilities to determine project feasibility [5] - Technical feasibility analysis should assess the compatibility of processes and equipment [5] - Tools like Value Engineering (VE) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) can help optimize design and translate customer needs into technical parameters [5] Group 5: Universality in R&D - Universality should focus on supply chain and production standardization rather than merely broadening product functions [7] - Standardized design can reduce the number of new drawings, with companies like Huawei aiming for 60% of designs to use existing modules [7] - Modular design, as demonstrated by Zoomlion's CBB approach, can cut costs by over 50% [7] Group 6: Evaluation Tools and Methods - Various tools and methods are recommended for assessing market analysis, technical validation, cost-effectiveness, risk assessment, and resource matching [8] - Establishing a cross-departmental review mechanism and data-driven decision-making can enhance project initiation accuracy [8]