大家有没有发现，这一次日本还挺硬气的。就在关税这个问题上，一直在跟美国拉扯。现在，美国已经给日本发了信，说：如果你不答应我25%的关税，或 者你敢报复我，你到时候报复我多少，我就加你多少。日本今天已经发了强烈的谴责。 这段时间，日本跟美国之间一直在谈这个关税，但一直没有谈拢。按照我们很多人的印象中，日本应该会迅速光速滑轨才行。但最终，越南嫌贵了？日本没 有贵，日本一直在跟美国拉扯，一直在跟美国拉锯战。那么日本为什么这一次突然这么硬气了呢？ 发展起来之后，到了70年代的时候，石油危机让日本汽车省油这个特点在全世界大放光彩。日本汽车就迅速在全世界发展起来，带动了整个日本的经济发 展，也带动了日本本土工业的发展。到了80年代的时候，日本是百花齐放，汽车、电器这些东西在全世界都非常受欢迎。这个时候就把美国品牌打得满地找 牙。当时日本的经济是直追美国，日本的股市、楼市是全面爆发式的发展。我记得日本楼市在最巅峰的时候，当时的楼价，东京的楼价应该是200多万人民 币一平方米。那是什么时代？80年代、90年代的时候，200万一平方米。股市当时日经指数是一度突破了37,000多点，这个最高点直到去年才被打破。 其实，日本是有前 ...

Core Points - Bulgaria has officially met the criteria to join the Eurozone, with a planned entry date of January 1, 2026, marking a significant milestone in its integration into the European Union [1][2] - The European Commission's report highlights that Bulgaria's legislation aligns with Eurozone requirements, and the move is expected to strengthen the economy and improve financing channels [1][2] - The potential economic benefits include an improved credit rating, cost savings exceeding 1 billion Lev annually, and the release of 15 billion Lev in frozen reserves, enhancing financial efficiency [2] Economic and Financial Implications - The introduction of the Euro is anticipated to stabilize prices, reduce transaction costs, protect savings, increase investment, and promote trade [1][2] - The Bulgarian government has mandated dual pricing in Lev and Euro to ensure price transparency and prevent inflation during the transition [3] - Concerns exist regarding the loss of monetary policy autonomy, as Bulgaria will rely on the European Central Bank for interest rates and money supply, which could lead to inflation and economic bubbles [4] Public Sentiment and Reactions - The decision to adopt the Euro has sparked mixed reactions among the public, with fears of rising prices and emotional attachment to the Lev being significant concerns [3][5] - Some citizens express difficulty in accepting the removal of the Lev, viewing it as a loss of national identity [5] - Criticism has emerged regarding the government's engagement with public opinion on this decision, suggesting a disconnect between policymakers and citizens [5]