Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for long-term investors to deeply interpret the reshaping of the global order and assess the cost-effectiveness of various assets, particularly in light of the increasing risks associated with U.S. recession and the implications of new investment paradigms [3][4][9]. Group 1: Introduction and Key Variables - The beginning of the year has seen two critical variables (Deepseek and reciprocal tariffs) that reinforce the underlying logic of a new investment paradigm characterized by increasing de-globalization, trends in AI industries, and debt cycles [3][12]. - The global risk premium has risen, potentially amplifying asymmetric pricing risks, particularly regarding the underpricing of recession risks in major asset classes [3][4]. Group 2: U.S. Recession Trading - Historical data shows that U.S. recession trading often begins 1-6 months before the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) officially declares a recession [4][42]. - Typical characteristics during U.S. recession trading include declines in U.S. stocks and industrial metals, falling 10-year Treasury yields, widening credit spreads, and defensive stocks outperforming cyclical stocks [4][47]. Group 3: Volatility During Recession Trading - During past U.S. recession trading phases, asset volatility has increased, with risk assets experiencing greater volatility than safe-haven assets [4][63]. - The volatility amplification factors for various assets have been ranked, with Nasdaq showing the highest, followed by the Indian SENSEX30 and Hang Seng Technology [5][70]. Group 4: All-Weather Strategy Model - The article discusses how to adjust the all-weather strategy model to correct the underestimation of U.S. recession risks in asset pricing [4][70]. - The model suggests increasing the allocation to Chinese convertible bonds and A-share dividends while reducing exposure to Nasdaq, Indian SENSEX30, and Hang Seng Technology based on their respective volatility amplification factors [5][70]. Group 5: Asymmetric Pricing Risks - The current global investment landscape shows a significant underestimation of U.S. recession risks, which presents an opportunity for asymmetric trading strategies that favor high potential gains with limited losses [4][24]. - The article highlights the importance of adjusting asset allocations to account for these asymmetric risks, particularly in light of the evolving global economic landscape [4][70].

Core Viewpoint - Long-term investors need to deeply interpret the direction of the reshaping world order and weigh the cost-effectiveness of various assets, as two key variables (Deepseek and reciprocal tariffs) have further strengthened the underlying logic of a new investment paradigm [1] Group 1: U.S. Recession Trading - The initiation of recession trading often leads the actual declaration of recession by the NBER by an average of 1-6 months [1] - Typical characteristics of U.S. recession trading include declines in U.S. stocks and industrial metals, a decrease in 10Y U.S. Treasury yields, widening U.S. credit spreads, and defensive stocks outperforming cyclical stocks [1] Group 2: Asset Volatility During Recession Trading - Historical data shows that asset volatility increases during U.S. recession trading phases, with risk assets experiencing a greater increase in volatility compared to safe-haven assets [2] - Specifically, the volatility amplification factor for risk assets (e.g., Nasdaq, Hang Seng Index) is greater than that for safe-haven assets (e.g., gold, U.S. Treasuries, Chinese bonds, A-share dividends) [2] Group 3: All-Weather Strategy Model - Investors need to focus on the asymmetric pricing risks in their portfolios, particularly the underestimation of U.S. recession risks [3] - The ranking of volatility amplification factors for various assets during past U.S. recession trading periods is as follows: Nasdaq > India SENSEX30 > Hang Seng Tech > U.S. Treasuries > Gold > Chinese bonds > Bitcoin > A-share dividends [3] - Adjustments to asset allocation based on corrected volatility factors indicate an increase in weight for Chinese convertible bonds and A-share dividends, while reducing weight for Nasdaq, India SENSEX30, and Hang Seng Tech [3]

Core Viewpoint - The expectation of a recession in the U.S. has limited impact on Chinese assets, but if it evolves into a recession trade, the scope and intensity of the impact could significantly increase. A tracking system has been established to monitor macroeconomic "soft/hard" data, core operating data of companies, and leading confidence indicators, along with a timeline of key events to help investors understand the current phase [1][2]. Group 1: Macroeconomic Indicators - Current U.S. economic indicators show strong hard data but weakening soft data, with stable CPI and non-farm employment numbers, while PMI for manufacturing and services has weakened significantly [3]. - As of Q4 2024, 55% of sample companies still show accelerating core operating indicators, but analyst forecasts have begun to decline, with expectations for further downtrends in Q1 and Q2 2025 [3]. Group 2: Earnings and Recession Phases - Historical transitions from recession expectations to actual recession trades are marked by continuous declines in corporate EPS, particularly in high-interest environments [7]. - The recession cycle can be divided into three trading phases: expectation trading, first-round recession trading, and second-round recession trading, with the first phase typically occurring after economic overheating and prior to interest rate hikes [7]. Group 3: Industry-Specific Insights - The performance of the financing industry, including investment banks and consumer credit companies, serves as a leading indicator of confidence cycles during recession trades, with significant average declines observed in previous downturns [8]. - Recent earnings data from major companies in various sectors, including investment banking and consumer credit, indicate varying trends, with some companies experiencing significant fluctuations in revenue and operating metrics [5]. Group 4: Upcoming Earnings Reports - The upcoming earnings season for U.S. companies is critical, with a focus on core cyclical companies' operating data and guidance, especially in the investment banking and consumer credit sectors [13]. - Key macroeconomic data and earnings calls from major companies will be closely monitored to assess the potential short-term impacts on Chinese assets and identify long-term investment opportunities [14].

戴康 CFA 广发证券发展研究中心 董事总经理（MD）、首席资产研究官 邮箱：daikang@gf.com.cn 报告摘要 ● 全球大类资产表现与宏观交易主线 ：（3.10-3.18），全球大类资产表现分化，权益>大宗>债券。全球大类资产交易 主线仍然围绕"美国衰退交易"，但程度较3月初有所缓和：10Y美债利率和美元指数延续回落趋势但幅度显著缓和，美 股仍弱于全球股市但下跌幅度同样有所缓和。 ● 大类资产配置——新投资范式下，"全球杠铃策略"是反脆弱时代嬗变下全球资产配置的最佳应对。 特朗普2.0 难以逆转（逆全球化加剧、债务周期错位、AI产业趋势）三大底层逻辑，甚至一定程度上加大全球政治经济不确 定性。战略层面，全球资产配置仍是反脆弱的"杠铃策略"。一端是确定性稳健资产：（1）债券：债务收缩期， 中国利率债调整后再次迎来配置良机；（2）权益：债务收缩期，战略配置中资股杠铃策略（红利+科技）、泛东 南亚股市；（3）另类：黄金的超国家主权信用价值是应对逆全球化新投资范式的必需配置。另一端是高收益高 波动资产：把握AI产业趋势下的美股及中国AI产业链基础设施建设向下游软件应用扩散的丰富机会。特朗普上台 后的政策节 ...