最高人民检察院9月28日通报，日前，贵州省大数据发展管理局原正厅级干部景亚萍涉嫌受贿罪一案，由 贵州省监察委员会调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经贵州省人民检察院指定管辖，由黔东南州人民检 察院依法向黔东南州中级人民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 黔东南州人民检察院起诉指控：被告人景亚萍利用担任省大数据局党组成员、副局长，省科学院院长，省 大数据局局长等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大，依法应当以受贿罪 追究其刑事责任。 公开资料显示， 景亚萍 1964年8月 出生于 贵州遵义，早年在贵州财经大学（前身为贵州财经学院）、 贵州理工学院工作，2016年12月任贵州省大数据 发展管理 局副局长、党组成员，2019年12月任贵州科 学院院长。 2021年11月，景亚萍回到贵州省大数据局工作，担任局长，2024年10月不再担任该职务。 2025年2月， 景亚萍官宣被查，6月被撤销 第十四届全国政协委员资格，8月被"双开"。 经查，景亚萍身为党员领导干部和国家公职人员，丧失理想信念，背弃初心使命，无视中央八项规定精 神，收受可能影响公正执行公务的礼品，将应由本人支付的费用交由他人支付； ...

Group 1 - The former vice president of China Construction Bank, Zhang Gengsheng, is under investigation for bribery and illegal loan issuance, with the case now in the hands of the Shandong Provincial People's Procuratorate for prosecution [1] - Zhang Gengsheng is accused of using his positions to benefit certain individuals and entities, illegally accepting substantial amounts of money, and violating national regulations regarding loan issuance, leading to significant losses [1][2] - The investigation revealed that Zhang Gengsheng engaged in various corrupt activities, including accepting gifts and benefits, and misusing his authority for personal gain, which resulted in severe disciplinary actions against him [2] Group 2 - Zhang Gengsheng has a long career within China Construction Bank, having held multiple senior positions, including vice president and chairman of a subsidiary [3][4] - He served as vice president of China Construction Bank starting in 2013 and held various leadership roles until he resigned from the vice president position in 2020 [4]

高检网8月7日消息，贵州省贵阳市人民政府原党组成员、副市长刘岚（副厅级）涉嫌受贿一案，由贵州 省监察委员会调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经贵州省人民检察院指定管辖，由安顺市人民检察院 审查起诉。日前，安顺市人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对刘岚作出逮捕决定。该案正在进一步办理中。 经查，刘岚丧失理想信念，背离初心使命，对抗组织审查；无视中央八项规定精神，收受可能影响公正 执行公务的礼品礼金，收受明显超出正常礼尚往来的财物；将公权力当作攫取私利的工具，利用职务便 利为他人在医疗设备采购等方面谋取利益，并非法收受巨额财物。 刘岚严重违反党的政治纪律、廉洁纪律和生活纪律，构成严重职务违法并涉嫌受贿犯罪，且在党的十八 大后不收敛、不收手，性质严重，影响恶劣，应予严肃处理。依据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》《中华 人民共和国监察法》《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》等有关规定，经贵州省纪委常委会会议研 究并报贵州省委批准，决定给予刘岚开除党籍处分；由贵州省监委给予其开除公职处分；终止其中共贵 阳市第十一次代表大会代表资格；收缴其违纪违法所得；将其涉嫌犯罪问题移送检察机关依法审查起 诉，所涉财物一并移送。 公开简历显示，刘岚， ...

Core Points - The former chairman of China Aviation Industry Corporation, Tan Ruishong, is facing prosecution for corruption, bribery, insider trading, and leaking insider information [1][2] - The investigation was conducted by the National Supervisory Commission and the Public Security Bureau of Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, with the case now being handled by the Dalian People's Procuratorate [1] - Tan is accused of illegally occupying public property and accepting bribes while holding various high-ranking positions within the aviation industry [1][2] Group 1 - Tan Ruishong was investigated for serious violations of political, organizational, and disciplinary regulations, leading to his expulsion from the Communist Party [2] - The allegations include using his official position to benefit others in business dealings and illegally receiving substantial amounts of money [2] - The case highlights significant issues of corruption within the aviation sector, particularly in the context of state-owned enterprises [2] Group 2 - Tan Ruishong held several key positions, including chairman of Harbin Aviation Industry Group and general manager of China Aviation Industry Corporation [3][4] - His educational background includes a bachelor's degree from Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics and a master's and doctoral degree from Harbin Engineering University [3] - His tenure as chairman of China Aviation Industry Corporation began in 2018, marking a significant leadership role in the industry [4]

通报显示，经查，2023年7月以来，韩某等3人相互勾结，利用手中管理物流配送业务和确定供应商准入、清退、考评、补贴发放等职权，帮助多家供应商获 取了数十座大中城市的物流配送业务资格，并借此大肆收取供应商刘某等4人的行贿款，甚至要求供应商根据利润情况按比例分成。在不到2年的时间内，韩 某等3名犯罪嫌疑人30余次收受供应商行贿款物达4000余万元。 警方调查发现，向韩某行贿或被其索贿的供应商中，有的曾因考核不达标，希望通过行贿保留供应商资格；有的则是为了改善经营状况而行贿，希望获取更 多关照。面对供应商的不同需求，韩某等人还会利用手中职权，将相关业务资源向行贿者进行倾斜，为供应商提供更多超出平台运营规则的生意便利，进而 方便3人进一步大肆敛财。警方还发现，韩某等人收受贿赂的手法极为隐蔽。他们在频繁接受供应商宴请的过程中，大肆收取巨额财物。为掩人耳目，三人 还将赃款赃物分散存放于多处租住房屋内。 在掌握确凿证据后，今年6月，上海警方在浙江警方的紧密配合下，先后成功抓获韩某等3人以及向其行贿的刘某等4名供应商负责人。目前，上述7名犯罪嫌 疑人分别因涉嫌非国家工作人员受贿罪、对非国家工作人员行贿罪，已被警方依法采取刑事 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant corruption case involving a senior executive from a Shanghai-based internet company, specifically related to bribery in logistics operations, highlighting the systemic issues within the industry [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - Seven suspects were arrested in connection with the bribery case, with the total amount involved exceeding 40 million yuan [1]. - The main suspect, Han Liu, a former logistics supervisor at Ele.me, was implicated in accepting bribes from suppliers in exchange for logistics service qualifications in various cities [1][3]. - The investigation revealed that Han and his accomplices engaged in corrupt practices over a period of less than two years, receiving bribes more than 30 times [1]. Group 2: Supplier Dynamics - Suppliers who bribed Han did so for various reasons, including retaining their supplier status after failing assessments and seeking better business conditions [3]. - Han and his associates leveraged their positions to provide preferential treatment to bribing suppliers, offering them business advantages beyond the platform's operational rules [3]. Group 3: Investigation and Response - The police conducted a coordinated operation with Zhejiang authorities to apprehend the suspects after gathering substantial evidence [3]. - Ele.me's internal investigation led to the reporting of Han's misconduct to law enforcement, emphasizing the company's commitment to integrity and compliance [5]. Group 4: Executive Background - Han Liu, born in the 1980s, previously worked at JD.com and joined Alibaba in 2019, eventually becoming the CEO of Ele.me in March 2024 [5][6]. - In February 2025, Ele.me's chairman announced that he would take over the CEO role, with Han focusing on the logistics center [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a bribery case involving a senior executive from a Shanghai-based internet company, highlighting the extent of corruption within the logistics sector and the implications for corporate governance and compliance [2][3][11]. Group 1: Case Details - The Shanghai police reported the arrest of seven suspects involved in a bribery case, with the total amount exceeding 40 million yuan (approximately 5.6 million USD) [2][5]. - The main suspect, Han Liu, a former logistics supervisor at Ele.me, was implicated in accepting bribes from suppliers in exchange for logistics business qualifications in various cities [3][4]. - Han and two accomplices allegedly received bribes over 30 times within two years, totaling more than 40 million yuan [5][11]. Group 2: Methods of Bribery - The investigation revealed that suppliers bribed Han to secure their business qualifications or to improve their operational conditions [7][8]. - Han and his accomplices used their authority to favor bribing suppliers, providing them with business advantages that exceeded platform operational rules [8][9]. - The suspects employed covert methods to conceal their bribery activities, including frequent supplier banquets and dispersing illicit funds across multiple rental properties [9][10]. Group 3: Corporate Response - Following the investigation, Ele.me acknowledged the misconduct and reported the case to law enforcement, emphasizing its commitment to integrity and compliance [13]. - Han Liu, who had a notable career trajectory within the company, was previously promoted to CEO of Ele.me before the investigation unfolded [14][15].

Group 1 - Li Aiqing, former chairman of Beijing Capital Group, was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery and abuse of power, marking a significant case in the capital's corporate governance [1][6][7] - The total amount of bribes Li Aiqing received exceeded 200 million yuan, making it the largest bribery case uncovered by the Beijing Supervisory Commission since the reform of the supervisory system [7][8] - Li Aiqing held leadership positions in major state-owned enterprises in Beijing for 18 years, significantly impacting the local economy and governance [4][5][6] Group 2 - The Beijing State-owned Assets Management Company, where Li served as chairman, is a key player in managing and operating government assets, with a focus on capital operation and investment [5][6] - Beijing Capital Group, another major enterprise under Li's leadership, specializes in environmental protection, real estate, infrastructure, and financial services, boasting total assets exceeding 400 billion yuan by the end of 2020 [5][6] - Li's actions led to significant losses for state-owned assets, highlighting the risks associated with concentrated power in state-owned enterprises [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the procedures and opinions regarding the handling of "self-laundering" issues discovered during the investigation of职务犯罪 (职务犯罪) cases by supervisory and prosecutorial authorities, emphasizing the need for coordination between these entities in both the investigation and prosecution phases [1][5]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1 involves Zhang, who accepted bribes totaling 10 million yuan and subsequently laundered the money through multiple bank transfers and property purchases [2]. - Case 2 involves Liu, who accepted 3 million yuan in bribes and laundered part of it through transfers to family members' accounts and then to an overseas account, amounting to 1 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Divergent Opinions - The first opinion suggests that evidence collected during the investigation can be shared to save resources, allowing for simultaneous prosecution of both bribery and money laundering [3]. - The second opinion argues that since money laundering falls under police jurisdiction, evidence should be transferred to the police for further investigation before prosecution [4]. - The third opinion supports the idea that if evidence of money laundering is clear and sufficient, it can be included in the prosecution submission for both crimes [4]. Group 3: Evidence Collection and Use - Evidence related to "self-laundering" collected by supervisory authorities can be used in court as it meets criminal trial standards [10]. - If the prosecutorial authority finds the evidence from supervisory authorities insufficient, it can either supplement the evidence or transfer the case to the police for further investigation [11][12]. Group 4: Prosecution Procedures - If the supervisory authority has established the facts of "self-laundering" and believes it meets prosecution conditions, it can include these facts in the prosecution submission [13]. - The prosecutorial authority can directly add charges of money laundering if it finds sufficient evidence and has consulted with the supervisory and police authorities [14][15].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the significant financial downturn of Tianqi Lithium Industries, with a projected revenue of 13.063 billion yuan for 2024, representing a year-on-year decrease of 67.75%, and a net loss attributable to shareholders of 7.905 billion yuan, marking a shift from profit to loss [1] Group 2 - The article discusses a corruption case involving a state-owned enterprise, where a middle management employee, Wang, was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling approximately 8.969 million yuan over a decade [2][3] - The methods of bribery included cash, luxury watches, bank transfers, and payment of expenses, with one instance involving a bribe of 1 million yuan concealed in a seafood box [3] - The court sentenced Wang to ten years and six months in prison and imposed a fine of 700,000 yuan, considering his confession and return of embezzled funds [6]