Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant corruption case involving a senior executive from a Shanghai-based internet company, specifically related to bribery in logistics operations, highlighting the systemic issues within the industry [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - Seven suspects were arrested in connection with the bribery case, with the total amount involved exceeding 40 million yuan [1]. - The main suspect, Han Liu, a former logistics supervisor at Ele.me, was implicated in accepting bribes from suppliers in exchange for logistics service qualifications in various cities [1][3]. - The investigation revealed that Han and his accomplices engaged in corrupt practices over a period of less than two years, receiving bribes more than 30 times [1]. Group 2: Supplier Dynamics - Suppliers who bribed Han did so for various reasons, including retaining their supplier status after failing assessments and seeking better business conditions [3]. - Han and his associates leveraged their positions to provide preferential treatment to bribing suppliers, offering them business advantages beyond the platform's operational rules [3]. Group 3: Investigation and Response - The police conducted a coordinated operation with Zhejiang authorities to apprehend the suspects after gathering substantial evidence [3]. - Ele.me's internal investigation led to the reporting of Han's misconduct to law enforcement, emphasizing the company's commitment to integrity and compliance [5]. Group 4: Executive Background - Han Liu, born in the 1980s, previously worked at JD.com and joined Alibaba in 2019, eventually becoming the CEO of Ele.me in March 2024 [5][6]. - In February 2025, Ele.me's chairman announced that he would take over the CEO role, with Han focusing on the logistics center [6].

本文转载自21世纪经济报道 值班 编辑｜ 江江 视觉 | 顾芗 7月24日，据上海经侦ECID，上海警方通报了一起上海互联网企业高管收受商业贿赂的案件，抓获受 贿、行贿犯罪嫌疑人七名，涉案金额达4000余万元。 警方通报中提到的"上海某互联网企业副总裁韩某"，即为饿了么物流前主管韩鎏，其在今年6月被饿了么 方面通报涉嫌职务犯罪后，被移送公安机关。 通报显示，经查，2023年7月以来，韩某等三人相互勾结，利用手中管理物流配送业务和确定供应商准 入、清退、考评、补贴发放等职权，帮助多家供应商获取了数十座大中城市的物流配送业务资格，并借 此大肆收取供应商刘某等四人的行贿款，甚至要求供应商根据利润情况按比例分成。在不到两年的时间 内，韩某等三名犯罪嫌疑人30余次收受供应商行贿款物达4000余万元。 图/上海经侦ECID 在调查的过程中警方发现，向韩某行贿或被其索贿的供应商中，有的曾因考核不达标，希望通过行贿保 留供应商资格；有的则是为了改善经营状况而行贿，希望获取更多关照。 面对供应商的不同需求，韩某等人还会利用手中职权，将相关业务资源向行贿者进行倾斜，为供应商提 供更多超出平台运营规则的生意便利，进而方便三人进一步 ...

Group 1 - Li Aiqing, former chairman of Beijing Capital Group, was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery and abuse of power, marking a significant case in the capital's corporate governance [1][6][7] - The total amount of bribes Li Aiqing received exceeded 200 million yuan, making it the largest bribery case uncovered by the Beijing Supervisory Commission since the reform of the supervisory system [7][8] - Li Aiqing held leadership positions in major state-owned enterprises in Beijing for 18 years, significantly impacting the local economy and governance [4][5][6] Group 2 - The Beijing State-owned Assets Management Company, where Li served as chairman, is a key player in managing and operating government assets, with a focus on capital operation and investment [5][6] - Beijing Capital Group, another major enterprise under Li's leadership, specializes in environmental protection, real estate, infrastructure, and financial services, boasting total assets exceeding 400 billion yuan by the end of 2020 [5][6] - Li's actions led to significant losses for state-owned assets, highlighting the risks associated with concentrated power in state-owned enterprises [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the procedures and opinions regarding the handling of "self-laundering" issues discovered during the investigation of职务犯罪 (职务犯罪) cases by supervisory and prosecutorial authorities, emphasizing the need for coordination between these entities in both the investigation and prosecution phases [1][5]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1 involves Zhang, who accepted bribes totaling 10 million yuan and subsequently laundered the money through multiple bank transfers and property purchases [2]. - Case 2 involves Liu, who accepted 3 million yuan in bribes and laundered part of it through transfers to family members' accounts and then to an overseas account, amounting to 1 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Divergent Opinions - The first opinion suggests that evidence collected during the investigation can be shared to save resources, allowing for simultaneous prosecution of both bribery and money laundering [3]. - The second opinion argues that since money laundering falls under police jurisdiction, evidence should be transferred to the police for further investigation before prosecution [4]. - The third opinion supports the idea that if evidence of money laundering is clear and sufficient, it can be included in the prosecution submission for both crimes [4]. Group 3: Evidence Collection and Use - Evidence related to "self-laundering" collected by supervisory authorities can be used in court as it meets criminal trial standards [10]. - If the prosecutorial authority finds the evidence from supervisory authorities insufficient, it can either supplement the evidence or transfer the case to the police for further investigation [11][12]. Group 4: Prosecution Procedures - If the supervisory authority has established the facts of "self-laundering" and believes it meets prosecution conditions, it can include these facts in the prosecution submission [13]. - The prosecutorial authority can directly add charges of money laundering if it finds sufficient evidence and has consulted with the supervisory and police authorities [14][15].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the significant financial downturn of Tianqi Lithium Industries, with a projected revenue of 13.063 billion yuan for 2024, representing a year-on-year decrease of 67.75%, and a net loss attributable to shareholders of 7.905 billion yuan, marking a shift from profit to loss [1] Group 2 - The article discusses a corruption case involving a state-owned enterprise, where a middle management employee, Wang, was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling approximately 8.969 million yuan over a decade [2][3] - The methods of bribery included cash, luxury watches, bank transfers, and payment of expenses, with one instance involving a bribe of 1 million yuan concealed in a seafood box [3] - The court sentenced Wang to ten years and six months in prison and imposed a fine of 700,000 yuan, considering his confession and return of embezzled funds [6]