Core Points - The public prosecution has been initiated against four individuals for various corruption-related charges, including bribery and embezzlement [1][2][3][4][5] Group 1: Individuals Involved - Sun Hongjun, former member of the Jilin Provincial Political Consultative Conference, is accused of bribery, embezzlement, and misappropriation of public funds, with the amounts involved being particularly large [2] - Deng Zhulin, former deputy general manager of Guizhou Phosphate (Group) Co., is charged with bribery, having allegedly accepted substantial illegal benefits while in various managerial positions [3] - Wang Dali, former vice president of Zunyi Medical University, faces bribery charges for illegally accepting significant amounts of money while serving in multiple academic and administrative roles [4] - Deng Zheng'an, former second-level inspector of Yiyang City, is accused of bribery, having allegedly used his position to illegally accept large sums of money [5] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The cases have been transferred from the respective provincial supervisory commissions to the local people's procuratorates for prosecution [2][3][4][5] - Each accused individual has been informed of their legal rights during the prosecution phase, and their defense opinions have been considered [2][3][4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The case discusses whether Zhang, a senior manager of a state-owned company, can be charged with illegal operation of similar businesses despite the fact that the business he engaged in was not within the registered scope of the company [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework - According to Article 165 of the Criminal Law, senior management of state-owned companies who exploit their position for personal gain in similar businesses can be charged with illegal operation of similar businesses [1]. - There are differing opinions on whether the registered business scope should determine the legality of Zhang's actions, with one view suggesting that since the coal trading was not registered, it does not constitute competition [2]. - The opposing view argues that "similar businesses" should be defined by substance rather than registration, and Zhang's actions fall under illegal operation due to his position and the significant profits gained [2][3]. Group 2: Judicial Interpretation - Judicial practice supports the notion that businesses outside the registered scope can still be considered "similar businesses" if they affect competition and opportunities [4]. - The determination of whether Zhang's actions constitute illegal operation can be analyzed through two lenses: whether the business is similar and whether it creates competition or conflict of interest with A Company [4]. - Zhang's actions directly impacted A Company's interests by competing for coal trading opportunities, thus qualifying as illegal operation under criminal law [4]. Group 3: Conclusion on Zhang's Actions - Zhang's behavior is characterized as a misuse of his position as a senior manager, constituting a breach of fiduciary duty and engaging in unfair competition [5]. - The conclusion drawn is that Zhang's actions, which involved leveraging his position to gain substantial illegal profits, should be classified as illegal operation of similar businesses [5].

Group 1 - The article discusses the severe disciplinary actions taken against several high-ranking officials, including Jiang Chaoliang, Lu Wenjun, and Zhang Jianhua, for serious violations of party discipline and laws [2][3][4][6] - Jiang Chaoliang was found to have lost his ideals and beliefs, engaged in superstitious activities, and accepted gifts and benefits that could influence his official duties [2][3] - Lu Wenjun similarly violated central regulations, accepted potentially compromising hospitality, and engaged in corrupt practices, including receiving large sums of money [4] - Zhang Jianhua was also found guilty of serious violations, including accepting gifts and using his position to benefit relatives, leading to significant financial misconduct [6] Group 2 - All three officials faced expulsion from the party and public office, with their illegal gains confiscated and criminal cases referred to the judiciary for prosecution [3][4][6] - The investigations revealed a pattern of corruption, including the use of public power for personal gain and engaging in family-style corruption [2][4][6] - The actions taken against these officials reflect a broader commitment to enforcing party discipline and combating corruption within the government [3][4][6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Jing Yaping, a former senior official in Guizhou's Big Data Development Management Bureau, who is facing prosecution for bribery and corruption related to his official duties [1][3]. Group 1: Background Information - Jing Yaping was born in August 1964 in Zunyi, Guizhou, and has held various positions, including Deputy Director of the Guizhou Big Data Development Management Bureau and President of the Guizhou Academy of Sciences [1]. - He returned to the Guizhou Big Data Bureau as Director in November 2021 and is set to leave this position in October 2024 [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The Guizhou Provincial Supervisory Committee concluded its investigation into Jing Yaping's case and transferred it to the prosecutorial authorities for review and prosecution [1]. - The Qiandongnan Prefecture People's Procuratorate has formally charged Jing Yaping with bribery, alleging that he used his official positions to benefit others and illegally accepted substantial amounts of money and property [1][3]. Group 3: Allegations and Misconduct - The investigation revealed that Jing Yaping, as a party leader and public official, lost his ideals and beliefs, disregarded the central regulations, and engaged in corrupt practices, including accepting gifts that could influence his official duties [3]. - He is accused of violating organizational principles and failing to report personal matters truthfully, as well as engaging in power-for-money transactions by leveraging his official capacity for project approvals and contracts [3].

Group 1 - The former vice president of China Construction Bank, Zhang Gengsheng, is under investigation for bribery and illegal loan issuance, with the case now in the hands of the Shandong Provincial People's Procuratorate for prosecution [1] - Zhang Gengsheng is accused of using his positions to benefit certain individuals and entities, illegally accepting substantial amounts of money, and violating national regulations regarding loan issuance, leading to significant losses [1][2] - The investigation revealed that Zhang Gengsheng engaged in various corrupt activities, including accepting gifts and benefits, and misusing his authority for personal gain, which resulted in severe disciplinary actions against him [2] Group 2 - Zhang Gengsheng has a long career within China Construction Bank, having held multiple senior positions, including vice president and chairman of a subsidiary [3][4] - He served as vice president of China Construction Bank starting in 2013 and held various leadership roles until he resigned from the vice president position in 2020 [4]

Core Points - Liu Lan, former deputy mayor of Guiyang, is under investigation for bribery and has been arrested by the Anshun City People's Procuratorate [1][2] - Liu was expelled from the Communist Party and removed from public office due to serious violations of political, integrity, and lifestyle disciplines [2] - Liu has a long career in the health sector, having held various positions in the Guizhou Provincial Health Department before becoming deputy mayor [2][3] Summary by Sections - **Investigation and Arrest** - Liu Lan's case was concluded by the Guizhou Provincial Supervisory Committee and transferred to the procuratorial authority for prosecution [1] - The Anshun City People's Procuratorate has made an arrest decision based on allegations of bribery [1] - **Disciplinary Actions** - Liu was expelled from the Communist Party and removed from her public office due to severe violations of party discipline and laws [2] - Her actions were deemed to have a serious nature and negative impact, warranting strict punishment [2] - **Career Background** - Liu Lan, born in March 1973, has a doctorate and has worked in various roles within the Guizhou Provincial Health Department [2] - She served as deputy mayor of Guiyang starting in 2021, overseeing education, commerce, and cultural tourism [3]

Core Points - The former chairman of China Aviation Industry Corporation, Tan Ruishong, is facing prosecution for corruption, bribery, insider trading, and leaking insider information [1][2] - The investigation was conducted by the National Supervisory Commission and the Public Security Bureau of Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, with the case now being handled by the Dalian People's Procuratorate [1] - Tan is accused of illegally occupying public property and accepting bribes while holding various high-ranking positions within the aviation industry [1][2] Group 1 - Tan Ruishong was investigated for serious violations of political, organizational, and disciplinary regulations, leading to his expulsion from the Communist Party [2] - The allegations include using his official position to benefit others in business dealings and illegally receiving substantial amounts of money [2] - The case highlights significant issues of corruption within the aviation sector, particularly in the context of state-owned enterprises [2] Group 2 - Tan Ruishong held several key positions, including chairman of Harbin Aviation Industry Group and general manager of China Aviation Industry Corporation [3][4] - His educational background includes a bachelor's degree from Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics and a master's and doctoral degree from Harbin Engineering University [3] - His tenure as chairman of China Aviation Industry Corporation began in 2018, marking a significant leadership role in the industry [4]

Core Points - A significant bribery case involving executives from a Shanghai internet company has been reported, with a total of 7 suspects arrested and over 40 million yuan involved [1][3] - The case centers around Han Liu, a former logistics supervisor at Ele.me, who was implicated in accepting bribes from suppliers in exchange for logistics business qualifications [3][4] - The investigation revealed that Han and two accomplices received bribes over 30 times within two years, totaling over 40 million yuan, by leveraging their authority in logistics and supplier management [3][4] Company Summary - Han Liu, the implicated executive, previously held senior positions at Ele.me, including Senior Vice President and President of Instant Delivery, and was set to become CEO in March 2024 [4] - The company conducted an internal investigation and reported the findings to law enforcement, indicating a proactive approach to compliance and governance [4] Industry Summary - The case highlights ongoing issues of corruption within the logistics and internet sectors in China, raising concerns about governance and ethical practices among major players [3][4] - The involvement of multiple suppliers in the bribery scheme suggests systemic issues within the supplier management processes in the logistics industry [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant corruption case involving a senior executive from a Shanghai-based internet company, specifically related to bribery in logistics operations, highlighting the systemic issues within the industry [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - Seven suspects were arrested in connection with the bribery case, with the total amount involved exceeding 40 million yuan [1]. - The main suspect, Han Liu, a former logistics supervisor at Ele.me, was implicated in accepting bribes from suppliers in exchange for logistics service qualifications in various cities [1][3]. - The investigation revealed that Han and his accomplices engaged in corrupt practices over a period of less than two years, receiving bribes more than 30 times [1]. Group 2: Supplier Dynamics - Suppliers who bribed Han did so for various reasons, including retaining their supplier status after failing assessments and seeking better business conditions [3]. - Han and his associates leveraged their positions to provide preferential treatment to bribing suppliers, offering them business advantages beyond the platform's operational rules [3]. Group 3: Investigation and Response - The police conducted a coordinated operation with Zhejiang authorities to apprehend the suspects after gathering substantial evidence [3]. - Ele.me's internal investigation led to the reporting of Han's misconduct to law enforcement, emphasizing the company's commitment to integrity and compliance [5]. Group 4: Executive Background - Han Liu, born in the 1980s, previously worked at JD.com and joined Alibaba in 2019, eventually becoming the CEO of Ele.me in March 2024 [5][6]. - In February 2025, Ele.me's chairman announced that he would take over the CEO role, with Han focusing on the logistics center [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a bribery case involving a senior executive from a Shanghai-based internet company, highlighting the extent of corruption within the logistics sector and the implications for corporate governance and compliance [2][3][11]. Group 1: Case Details - The Shanghai police reported the arrest of seven suspects involved in a bribery case, with the total amount exceeding 40 million yuan (approximately 5.6 million USD) [2][5]. - The main suspect, Han Liu, a former logistics supervisor at Ele.me, was implicated in accepting bribes from suppliers in exchange for logistics business qualifications in various cities [3][4]. - Han and two accomplices allegedly received bribes over 30 times within two years, totaling more than 40 million yuan [5][11]. Group 2: Methods of Bribery - The investigation revealed that suppliers bribed Han to secure their business qualifications or to improve their operational conditions [7][8]. - Han and his accomplices used their authority to favor bribing suppliers, providing them with business advantages that exceeded platform operational rules [8][9]. - The suspects employed covert methods to conceal their bribery activities, including frequent supplier banquets and dispersing illicit funds across multiple rental properties [9][10]. Group 3: Corporate Response - Following the investigation, Ele.me acknowledged the misconduct and reported the case to law enforcement, emphasizing its commitment to integrity and compliance [13]. - Han Liu, who had a notable career trajectory within the company, was previously promoted to CEO of Ele.me before the investigation unfolded [14][15].