近段时间，伴随《阿凡达3》《疯狂动物城2》等影片的热映，不少观众在社交平台晒出自己在影院拍摄 的画面或视频，再次引发关于屏摄行为的讨论。这究竟是无伤大雅的打卡留念，还是触碰"红线"的违规 行为？ 中国传媒大学文化产业管理学院法律系主任郑宁表示，要依法依规审视屏摄的使用情况，判断是否构成 了对著作权的侵害。"一是合理使用只能在某些特殊情况下作出，如用于个人学习研究或欣赏、新闻报 道等；二是合理使用不得与作品的正常使用相冲突；三是不得损害权利人的合法权益。"郑宁提示，如 果拍摄并传播的是决定剧情走向的核心画面、关键反转或精彩视效，足以严重影响观众进入影院观看正 片的体验，就明显超出合理范围，涉嫌违法。 中国法学会网络与信息法学研究会副秘书长赵精武认为，要将普通观众为了打卡的屏摄，与以非法营利 为目的开展的、有组织的盗摄行为进行区分。前者是观众的自发分享，后者是恶意的违法生意。"《中 华人民共和国电影产业促进法》《中华人民共和国著作权法》对相关情况作出了规定，如何更好普及与 落实法律法规，规劝观众不良行为，同样不可忽视。"赵精武说。 该如何应对屏摄行为？"做到疏堵结合，才能在保护打卡分享积极性的同时，有效引导观众文 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent legal case involving Visual China and photographer Dai Jianfeng has progressed, with Visual China acknowledging copyright infringement regarding the image "Village Under the Galaxy" and committing to improve copyright protection measures [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Tianjin Peace District People's Court ruled that Visual China infringed on Dai Jianfeng's rights by displaying and selling the image "Village Under the Galaxy," which was uploaded by a third-party contributor without authorization [2][7]. - The court ordered Visual China to compensate Dai Jianfeng 15,000 yuan and to take measures to eliminate the negative impact of the infringement [7]. Group 2: Company Response - Visual China issued a statement apologizing for the infringement and confirmed that the infringing image has been removed from their website [2][4]. - The company pledged to enhance its content review processes to better protect the rights of copyright holders and contribute to a healthier copyright ecosystem [2][4].

Core Viewpoint - Visual China and two other companies issued a statement regarding a copyright dispute involving the image "Village Under the Galaxy," acknowledging infringement of the copyright holder Dai Jianfeng's rights and committing to improve copyright protection measures [1][3]. Group 1 - The image "Village Under the Galaxy" was uploaded by a third party without authorization, leading to a copyright infringement case [1]. - The Tianjin Peace District People's Court recognized Dai Jianfeng as the copyright owner of the image, confirming that Visual China violated his rights [1]. - Visual China has removed the infringing image from its website and has ceased the infringing activities following the lawsuit [1]. Group 2 - The company expressed its commitment to enhancing the protection of copyright holders' rights and improving content review processes to contribute to a healthy copyright ecosystem [1].

Core Viewpoint - Visual China and two other companies issued a statement regarding a copyright dispute with Dai Jianfeng, acknowledging the infringement of his rights related to the image "Village Under the Galaxy" [1][4]. Group 1 - The image "Village Under the Galaxy" was uploaded by a third party without authorization, leading to the copyright infringement case [1][4]. - The Tianjin Peace District People's Court recognized Dai Jianfeng as the copyright owner of the image, confirming that Visual China violated his rights to attribution and online dissemination [1][4]. - The infringing image has been removed from the website following the lawsuit, and the infringement has ceased [1][4]. Group 2 - The company commits to enhancing the protection of copyright holders' rights and will continuously improve its content review processes [2][4]. - The statement emphasizes the company's dedication to contributing to a healthy copyright ecosystem in the future [2][4].

Core Viewpoint - The companies involved have acknowledged the copyright infringement related to the image "Village Under the Galaxy" and have committed to improving copyright protection measures in the future [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Tianjin Heping District People's Court has recognized Dai Jianfeng as the copyright owner of the image "Village Under the Galaxy" [1] - The companies involved have apologized for infringing upon Dai Jianfeng's rights, specifically his right to attribution and information network dissemination [1] Group 2: Company Actions - The infringing image has been removed from the website following the lawsuit [1] - The companies have pledged to enhance their content review processes to protect copyright holders' rights and contribute to a healthy copyright ecosystem [1]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of using copyrighted images without authorization in the context of social media, emphasizing the importance of respecting intellectual property rights in digital content creation [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - A tourism company was found to have used six copyrighted photographs owned by an imaging company in its WeChat articles without authorization [1]. - The imaging company specializes in creating and producing original visual content for various clients, including advertising agencies and media [1]. - The court ruled that the tourism company's actions constituted an infringement of the imaging company's information network dissemination rights, leading to a legal obligation to cease the infringement and compensate for damages [2]. Group 2: Legal Framework - The court determined that the photographs in question were original works protected under Chinese copyright law [2]. - The ruling was based on specific provisions of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China and relevant judicial interpretations regarding online dissemination rights [2]. - The tourism company failed to prove the source of the images used, reinforcing the court's decision to hold it liable for copyright infringement [2].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese news agencies Nikkei and Asahi have filed a lawsuit against the American startup Perplexity for allegedly infringing copyright by using AI to collect and utilize news articles without permission, seeking 2.2 billion yen in damages from each agency [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed on August 26, 2023, in the Tokyo District Court, marking a significant legal action against AI operators in Japan [2]. - Perplexity is accused of ignoring technical measures to prevent unauthorized access to Nikkei and Asahi's servers since at least June 2024, generating and providing summary articles that violate Japan's Copyright Law [4]. - The summaries provided by Perplexity contain errors and misrepresent the original articles, damaging the reputation of the news agencies and violating Japan's Unfair Competition Prevention Law [4]. Group 2: Claims and Demands - Nikkei and Asahi are demanding a court order to prohibit Perplexity from using related articles and to delete the summary content, in addition to claiming 2.2 billion yen for damages due to commercial harm [5]. - The unauthorized content includes articles from Nikkei's paid subscription service and articles provided to Yahoo News by Asahi [4]. Group 3: Industry Context - Perplexity, founded in 2022 by OpenAI engineers, has gained attention as a promising startup in the AI search field, backed by notable investors including Jeff Bezos and Nvidia [5]. - The company reportedly serves over 15 million users globally each month and collaborates with SoftBank to provide AI search services in Japan [5]. - Concerns regarding potential copyright infringement by Perplexity have been echoed by various media outlets, with ongoing litigation from Dow Jones, which owns The Wall Street Journal [5].

Core Viewpoint - The second-instance ruling in the copyright dispute between NetEase's "Rate of the Earth" and Lingxi Interactive's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms: Strategy Edition" reversed the first-instance decision, stating that "Romance of the Three Kingdoms: Strategy Edition" did not infringe on the copyright of "Rate of the Earth" [1][2][7] Summary by Sections Legal Ruling - The Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court ruled that the first-instance judgment was flawed, citing unclear basic facts and incorrect comparison methods, thus sending the case back for retrial [1][2] - The court emphasized that copyright law protects original expressions rather than ideas, indicating that the gameplay rules and design of "Rate of the Earth" fall under the category of ideas and systems, not copyrightable expressions [2][4][5] Game Industry Impact - The ruling signifies a maturation of legal standards regarding copyright disputes in the gaming industry, potentially influencing future cases [1][6] - The decision clarifies the "safe zone" for gameplay innovation, steering industry competition back to the realm of expression and preventing copyright abuse by dominant firms [7][8] - The case highlights a shift towards more nuanced copyright protections in the gaming sector, advocating for the separation of protections for different elements of a game, such as music, art, and text [8] Market Performance - "Romance of the Three Kingdoms: Strategy Edition" has performed strongly in the market since its launch in 2019, consistently ranking in the top 20 of sales charts, while "Rate of the Earth" remains in the top 40 [6] - Lingxi Interactive's position in the SLG market has been bolstered by the success of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms: Strategy Edition," which has attracted a large player base [6]

Core Insights - The popularity of LABUBU has decreased after a significant restock, with prices in the secondary market dropping sharply from a peak [1][6] - The 3D printing industry is experiencing a pivotal moment, driven by the demand for DIY toys and the rapid growth of the cultural and trendy toy sector [5][6] Market Trends - LABUBU's average selling price fell from 2507.04 yuan to 1881.05 yuan in just one day, marking a nearly 25% drop, and has since decreased over 65% to 867.02 yuan [1][6] - The stock prices of companies related to 3D printing, such as Hai Zheng Sheng Cai and Jin Cheng Zi, have also seen declines, with Hai Zheng Sheng Cai dropping nearly 16% and Jin Cheng Zi falling about 10% [1][6] 3D Printing Industry Dynamics - The number of LABUBU models available on the MakerWorld platform increased from 663 to 932 in just nine days, indicating a growing interest in 3D printing among consumers [5][6] - East Wu Securities predicts that the consumer-grade 3D printer market will become a new consumer product hit, with a projected 40% year-on-year growth in 3D printing equipment production by May 2025 [5][6] Intellectual Property Concerns - The rise of 3D printed LABUBU has sparked discussions about copyright infringement, as unauthorized reproduction of LABUBU models could violate copyright laws [8][11] - Users uploading LABUBU models for others to download may face legal consequences, as this could infringe on the copyright holder's rights [11][12]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the growing issue of copyright infringement through AI-generated modifications of original artworks, raising concerns among creators about the protection of their intellectual property rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Details - Zhang Wei, an original illustrator, discovered her artwork was sold as puzzles without authorization, modified by AI software, leading to consumer confusion regarding authenticity [1]. - The first criminal case in Beijing involving AI-generated copyright infringement resulted in multiple defendants being sentenced to prison terms ranging from 1 year and 6 months to probation, along with fines [1][2]. - The defendants sold over 3,000 modified puzzle pieces, generating profits exceeding 270,000 yuan [1]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Implications - The case faced challenges due to the novelty of AI technology, with no prior criminal cases as references, highlighting the need for legal frameworks to address such high-tech crimes [2][3]. - The prosecution's investigation revealed that multiple creators, including five others, had their works infringed upon, indicating a broader issue within the industry [2]. - The court's ruling serves as a reassurance for creators, encouraging them to continue their work without fear of unauthorized use of their creations [3]. Group 3: Future Directions - The Tongzhou District Prosecutor's Office plans to enhance regulatory measures in the e-commerce sector, focusing on the integration of AI technology and copyright protection [3].