记者2月24日从最高人民检察院获悉，2025年1月至11月，全国检察机关共办理知识产权刑事检察案 件18803件，民事检察案件1165件，行政检察案件1516件，公益诉讼检察案件542件，合计22026件。 检察机关加强高新技术领域知识产权保护，依法惩治侵犯商业秘密犯罪，最高检指导各地办理了一 批涉信息技术、人工智能、生物医药、新能源等领域案件。2025年1月至11月，全国检察机关受理审查 起诉侵犯商业秘密犯罪103件232人，起诉143人。其中，最高检指导上海检察机关办理的尊湃侵犯华为 海思芯片技术商业秘密案涉及国产芯片技术，涉案金额3.17亿元。上海检察机关以侵犯商业秘密罪提起 公诉，14名被告人均被判处刑罚。 据统计，2025年1月至11月，检察机关共起诉涉及文创产品侵犯知识产权犯罪案件64件，其中包括 涉及"哪吒"案件20件、涉及"泡泡玛特"案件13件。浙江东阳检察机关办理的一起侵犯著作权犯罪案件 中，被告人搭建非法影视网站，向公众播放盗版《哪吒之魔童闹海》《封神第二部：战火西岐》等电影 牟利，涉及盗版电影13万余部，检察机关以侵犯著作权罪提起公诉，被告人被判处有期徒刑并处罚金。 （记者 刘硕） 与此 ...

公开信息显示，广州市动景计算机科技有限公司成立于2005年3月，法定代表人为王鑫，注册资本3亿元 人民币，由杭州宝轩投资管理有限公司与广州大鱼快乐信息技术有限公司共同持股，隶属于阿里巴巴集 团旗下，其核心产品包括UC浏览器系列、UC头条、小萌圈等多款互联网产品。 凤凰网科技讯1月30日，近日，广州市动景计算机科技有限公司被东莞市文化广电旅游体育局作出行政 处罚，没收违法所得21万余元，同时处以罚款105万余元，两项罚没金额总计达126万元。此次处罚的核 心事由为，该公司在未获得著作权人授权许可的情况下，擅自通过信息网络向公众传播他人享有著作权 的作品，违反了著作权相关法律法规。 ...

2026年开年，国内金饰价格持续上涨，多家品牌金饰克价逼近1500元。1月22日，#胖东来金饰每克便宜 200元#话题登上热搜。 事实上，除了胖东来以外，其他金饰品牌也都对自家产品申请了多件商标和著作权保护，可以有效防止 他人擅自复制使用。这种保护方式不仅保护了企业的无形资产，也强化了品牌的文化特质。 著作权登记证书是权利归属的初步证明，能有效避免他人对作品的原创性提出质疑或抢注版权。对于黄 金产品设计而言，登记后可清晰界定设计者或企业的著作权人身份，减少因权属争议引发的纠纷。 著作权登记体现了企业或设计师对原创设计的重视，有助于提升品牌的专业形象和市场认可度。消费者 更倾向于购买具有原创设计保护的产品，登记著作权可增强品牌的差异化竞争力，吸引注重品质和设计 的客户。 知协查询了解到，许昌市胖东来商贸集团有限公司已成功注册多件"东来赤金"商标，类别是核心产品14 类-珠宝钟表类。 此外，胖东来公司还为"胖东来十二生肖金吊坠""珠宝莲韵金条""珠宝蛇年金条""胖东来自由爱金条"等 黄金产品登记作品著作权，作品类别为美术作品（珠宝设计）。 并且，由于胖东来的大部分金饰不加收加工费，其价格可以媲美深圳水贝市场的非品 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent discussions surrounding screen recording behavior in cinemas, particularly in light of popular films like "Avatar 3" and "Zootopia 2," raise questions about copyright infringement and the balance between personal sharing and legal boundaries [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Perspectives - Zheng Ning, a legal expert, emphasizes that screen recording may infringe on copyright if it conflicts with the normal use of the work or harms the rights of the copyright holder [1]. - Zhao Jingwu, a legal scholar, differentiates between casual audience screen recording for personal sharing and organized illegal recording for profit, highlighting the need for better legal awareness and enforcement [1]. Group 2: Industry Response - The cinema industry is adopting a dual approach of encouragement and regulation to manage screen recording, with regular inspections and efforts to educate audiences about respectful viewing [2]. - Zheng Ning suggests leveraging new technologies, such as digital watermarking, to enhance copyright protection and promote legal awareness among viewers [2]. Group 3: Collaboration and Awareness - Young creators like Li Taiyan advocate for stronger interaction between creators and audiences to foster a culture of copyright respect, while expressing concern over the distortion of their work due to unauthorized recordings [2]. - Zhao Jingwu calls for collaborative governance, urging online platforms to fulfill their content review responsibilities and work with relevant stakeholders to combat illegal recording activities [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent legal case involving Visual China and photographer Dai Jianfeng has progressed, with Visual China acknowledging copyright infringement regarding the image "Village Under the Galaxy" and committing to improve copyright protection measures [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Tianjin Peace District People's Court ruled that Visual China infringed on Dai Jianfeng's rights by displaying and selling the image "Village Under the Galaxy," which was uploaded by a third-party contributor without authorization [2][7]. - The court ordered Visual China to compensate Dai Jianfeng 15,000 yuan and to take measures to eliminate the negative impact of the infringement [7]. Group 2: Company Response - Visual China issued a statement apologizing for the infringement and confirmed that the infringing image has been removed from their website [2][4]. - The company pledged to enhance its content review processes to better protect the rights of copyright holders and contribute to a healthier copyright ecosystem [2][4].

Core Viewpoint - Visual China and two other companies issued a statement regarding a copyright dispute involving the image "Village Under the Galaxy," acknowledging infringement of the copyright holder Dai Jianfeng's rights and committing to improve copyright protection measures [1][3]. Group 1 - The image "Village Under the Galaxy" was uploaded by a third party without authorization, leading to a copyright infringement case [1]. - The Tianjin Peace District People's Court recognized Dai Jianfeng as the copyright owner of the image, confirming that Visual China violated his rights [1]. - Visual China has removed the infringing image from its website and has ceased the infringing activities following the lawsuit [1]. Group 2 - The company expressed its commitment to enhancing the protection of copyright holders' rights and improving content review processes to contribute to a healthy copyright ecosystem [1].

Core Viewpoint - Visual China and two other companies issued a statement regarding a copyright dispute with Dai Jianfeng, acknowledging the infringement of his rights related to the image "Village Under the Galaxy" [1][4]. Group 1 - The image "Village Under the Galaxy" was uploaded by a third party without authorization, leading to the copyright infringement case [1][4]. - The Tianjin Peace District People's Court recognized Dai Jianfeng as the copyright owner of the image, confirming that Visual China violated his rights to attribution and online dissemination [1][4]. - The infringing image has been removed from the website following the lawsuit, and the infringement has ceased [1][4]. Group 2 - The company commits to enhancing the protection of copyright holders' rights and will continuously improve its content review processes [2][4]. - The statement emphasizes the company's dedication to contributing to a healthy copyright ecosystem in the future [2][4].

Core Viewpoint - The companies involved have acknowledged the copyright infringement related to the image "Village Under the Galaxy" and have committed to improving copyright protection measures in the future [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Tianjin Heping District People's Court has recognized Dai Jianfeng as the copyright owner of the image "Village Under the Galaxy" [1] - The companies involved have apologized for infringing upon Dai Jianfeng's rights, specifically his right to attribution and information network dissemination [1] Group 2: Company Actions - The infringing image has been removed from the website following the lawsuit [1] - The companies have pledged to enhance their content review processes to protect copyright holders' rights and contribute to a healthy copyright ecosystem [1]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of using copyrighted images without authorization in the context of social media, emphasizing the importance of respecting intellectual property rights in digital content creation [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - A tourism company was found to have used six copyrighted photographs owned by an imaging company in its WeChat articles without authorization [1]. - The imaging company specializes in creating and producing original visual content for various clients, including advertising agencies and media [1]. - The court ruled that the tourism company's actions constituted an infringement of the imaging company's information network dissemination rights, leading to a legal obligation to cease the infringement and compensate for damages [2]. Group 2: Legal Framework - The court determined that the photographs in question were original works protected under Chinese copyright law [2]. - The ruling was based on specific provisions of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China and relevant judicial interpretations regarding online dissemination rights [2]. - The tourism company failed to prove the source of the images used, reinforcing the court's decision to hold it liable for copyright infringement [2].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese news agencies Nikkei and Asahi have filed a lawsuit against the American startup Perplexity for allegedly infringing copyright by using AI to collect and utilize news articles without permission, seeking 2.2 billion yen in damages from each agency [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed on August 26, 2023, in the Tokyo District Court, marking a significant legal action against AI operators in Japan [2]. - Perplexity is accused of ignoring technical measures to prevent unauthorized access to Nikkei and Asahi's servers since at least June 2024, generating and providing summary articles that violate Japan's Copyright Law [4]. - The summaries provided by Perplexity contain errors and misrepresent the original articles, damaging the reputation of the news agencies and violating Japan's Unfair Competition Prevention Law [4]. Group 2: Claims and Demands - Nikkei and Asahi are demanding a court order to prohibit Perplexity from using related articles and to delete the summary content, in addition to claiming 2.2 billion yen for damages due to commercial harm [5]. - The unauthorized content includes articles from Nikkei's paid subscription service and articles provided to Yahoo News by Asahi [4]. Group 3: Industry Context - Perplexity, founded in 2022 by OpenAI engineers, has gained attention as a promising startup in the AI search field, backed by notable investors including Jeff Bezos and Nvidia [5]. - The company reportedly serves over 15 million users globally each month and collaborates with SoftBank to provide AI search services in Japan [5]. - Concerns regarding potential copyright infringement by Perplexity have been echoed by various media outlets, with ongoing litigation from Dow Jones, which owns The Wall Street Journal [5].