Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the importance of surrounding oneself with individuals of higher cognitive levels to expand one's understanding and perspective [6][11] - It highlights the "Dunning-Kruger effect," where individuals with lower cognitive abilities tend to be overconfident and dismissive of differing opinions [10][21] - The article suggests that understanding different viewpoints can lead to personal growth and a broader worldview [24][75] Group 2 - Decision-making should prioritize thoughtful consideration over impulsive action, as demonstrated by the story of an entrepreneur who failed due to lack of research [30][46] - High cognitive individuals take time to analyze situations before acting, ensuring their decisions are well-informed [40][44] - The importance of preparation and planning is emphasized, as it leads to more effective outcomes [46][81] Group 3 - Effective communication involves listening before speaking, as illustrated by the story of a wise scholar who engaged with a young student's ideas respectfully [62][59] - The article argues that true wisdom lies in the ability to listen and learn from others rather than imposing one's views [51][60] - It promotes the idea that listening enhances one's understanding and fosters a more open mindset [62][78] Group 4 - The narrative encourages individuals to refrain from quick judgments and to seek a deeper understanding of others and their circumstances [65][74] - It illustrates that a narrow perspective can lead to misjudgments, while a broader view allows for a more nuanced understanding of complex issues [72][79] - The article concludes that personal growth and cognitive development stem from a willingness to explore and embrace diverse perspectives [80][81]

Core Viewpoint - The integration of AI and big data has shifted the supply of knowledge from scarcity to abundance, necessitating a transformation in talent assessment from a focus on memorization to a comprehensive evaluation of individual capabilities [1][4] Group 1: New Assessment Paradigm - The traditional talent selection model, which emphasizes static knowledge recall, is becoming less effective and misaligned with societal needs [1][2] - Future talent selection should be based on a matrix of core capabilities, including problem definition, critical thinking, and practical innovation [2][3] - The assessment should focus on the cognitive processes involved in problem-solving rather than merely the final answers [3] Group 2: Implementation Strategies - Future examinations may shift towards open-book formats that simulate real-world research environments, emphasizing information selection and logical reasoning [3] - The design of assessments should prioritize performance evaluation and project-based assessments to gauge collaborative and innovative skills [3] - Establishing a comprehensive personal capability digital portfolio will allow for continuous tracking of an individual's growth and skills beyond traditional scoring [3][4] Group 3: Societal Implications - The shift in assessment philosophy reflects a broader societal change in valuing unique cognitive abilities and creative potential over mere knowledge retention [4] - This transformation aims to cultivate proactive creators who can effectively leverage technology and drive future innovations [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the characteristics of stubborn individuals and how their rigid mindset can hinder personal and professional growth, emphasizing the importance of improving cognitive flexibility to overcome stubbornness [1][2][16]. Group 1: Characteristics of Stubborn Individuals - Stubborn individuals often exhibit rigid thinking and tend to solve problems using the same outdated methods, such as blaming personnel issues instead of analyzing strategic or organizational problems [4][7][8]. - They believe they are always right and dismiss constructive feedback from others, leading to a cycle of external blame when things go wrong [9][12]. - Even when aware of their mistakes, stubborn individuals refuse to acknowledge them, viewing it as a loss of face, which prevents them from learning and growing [13][14]. Group 2: Improving Cognitive Flexibility - To enhance cognitive flexibility, individuals should adopt an open mindset, which involves accepting different opinions and recognizing personal limitations [18][20]. - Deep thinking is essential for developing new cognitive models, allowing individuals to adapt their problem-solving approaches when faced with new challenges [24][27][30]. - Validating these cognitive models through practical application is crucial, as theoretical knowledge without practice remains ineffective [31][33].