Workflow
贸易信贷
icon
Search documents
研究 | 黄日环:贸易信贷中的“风险悖论”——为何高破产风险反而让零售商赚更多?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-19 10:32
Core Insights - The research highlights a paradox in trade credit where higher bankruptcy risks lead to increased profits for retailers, contrary to traditional theoretical predictions [1][2][6]. Group 1: Research Background - Small and medium-sized enterprises face financing constraints, making trade credit a crucial financing tool for retailers who struggle to obtain bank loans [1][5]. - Existing theories predict that retailers under financial constraints will increase orders due to limited liability protection, while suppliers will raise wholesale prices to capture higher profits [1][6]. Group 2: Experimental Study - The study conducted controlled laboratory experiments to empirically test how bankruptcy risk affects order quantities, wholesale pricing decisions, and profit outcomes under trade credit contracts [2][6]. - The experiment involved three different initial funding levels for retailers: no bankruptcy risk (NR), low bankruptcy risk (LR), and high bankruptcy risk (HR) [6]. Group 3: Key Findings - Contrary to theoretical predictions, retailers significantly reduced order quantities when facing bankruptcy risks, while suppliers lowered wholesale prices in response [2][6][7]. - Retailers' profits increased with higher bankruptcy risks, which is opposite to the predictions of the complete rationality model [6][7]. - Behavioral models, including reference point dependence and fairness preferences, effectively explain the decision-making biases observed in the experiment [6][7]. Group 4: Management Implications - Suppliers should recognize the conservative behavior of retailers under bankruptcy risk and adjust contract designs accordingly [7]. - Retailers may overlook profit opportunities due to a failure to consider the advantages of limited liability [7].
货币黄金增长规模创2011年以来的历史纪录——2025年Q1跨境资本季度跟踪
一瑜中的· 2025-07-18 15:36
Core Viewpoint - The cross-border capital flow pattern in Q1 2025 is similar to that of Q4 2023 to Q3 2024, with foreign capital continuing to net inflow while domestic capital experiences a net outflow, reaching the highest level since Q1 2021 [2][4] Group 1: Cross-Border Capital Flow Overview - In Q1 2025, cross-border capital continued to net outflow, amounting to $316.7 billion, with domestic capital outflow reaching $481.1 billion, the highest since Q1 2021 [4][11] - The main drivers of the domestic capital outflow include domestic investors purchasing overseas stocks and investment funds through channels like "Hong Kong Stock Connect," leading to a securities investment outflow of $164.5 billion [4][11] - Domestic direct investment outflow was $143.6 billion, reflecting a proactive "going out" strategy by Chinese enterprises [4][11] Group 2: Domestic Securities Investment - The outflow of domestic securities investment in Q1 2025 reached a historical record since 2011, totaling $164.5 billion, while foreign securities investment saw a net inflow of $121.8 billion [5][13] - The outflow included $125.1 billion from equity investments and $39.4 billion from bond investments, with the main channels being "Hong Kong Stock Connect" and Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) programs [5][13][14] - Foreign equity investment shifted from a net outflow of $85.7 billion in Q4 2024 to a significant net inflow of $121.8 billion in Q1 2025, driven by positive market expectations for Chinese technology stocks [5][14] Group 3: Domestic Direct Investment - Domestic direct investment outflow reached $143.6 billion in Q1 2025, the highest since Q1 2021, with total direct investment net outflow at $110.3 billion [6][18] - The increase in domestic direct investment outflow is attributed to the restructuring of global supply chains and the deep integration of the Chinese market with global markets [6][18] Group 4: Trade Credit - Trade credit net outflow in Q1 2025 reached $44.2 billion, the highest since Q4 2015, with domestic trade credit outflow of $18.3 billion [7][23] - The outflow was influenced by market expectations of RMB appreciation and changes in import and export settlement rates [7][23] Group 5: Monetary Gold Growth - Monetary gold increased by $38.3 billion in Q1 2025, marking a record since 2011, with the central bank accumulating a total of 11.26 million ounces of gold since November 2022 [8][29] - This increase is part of the fifth round of gold accumulation by the central bank since 2000, reflecting a strategic move in response to global economic conditions [8][29] Group 6: Capital Flow Breakdown - In Q1 2025, total capital outflow was $512.1 billion, a 58.8% increase from the previous quarter, primarily driven by increased overseas investments by domestic investors [42][43] - The capital outflow was significantly influenced by a $30.5 billion increase in overseas investments and a $78.3 billion increase in reserve assets [42][43] Group 7: Capital Inflow Breakdown - Total capital inflow in Q1 2025 was $195.4 billion, with foreign investors contributing $153.5 billion through domestic asset investments [45][46] - The inflow was supported by a $12.1 billion increase in direct investments and a $121.8 billion increase in securities investments [45][46]
【宏观专题】2025年Q1跨境资本季度跟踪:货币黄金增长规模创2011年以来的历史记录
Huachuang Securities· 2025-07-18 07:57
Group 1: Capital Flow Overview - In Q1 2025, cross-border capital continued to show a net outflow of $316.7 billion, the highest level since Q1 2021[2] - The main driver of the net outflow was domestic capital outflow, which reached $481.1 billion, also the highest since Q1 2021[2] - Foreign capital inflow amounted to $195.4 billion, while foreign capital outflow was $31.0 billion[2] Group 2: Domestic Investment Trends - Domestic securities investment outflow reached a record high of $164.5 billion since 2011, with $1.25 billion in equity investment and $394 million in bond investment[22] - Direct investment outflow from domestic sources was $143.6 billion, marking the highest level since Q1 2021[30] - Trade credit net outflow was $44.2 billion, the highest since Q4 2015, with domestic trade credit outflow of $18.3 billion[32] Group 3: Gold Reserves and Monetary Trends - Monetary gold increased by $38.3 billion in Q1 2025, setting a record since 2011, with a total increase of 1.126 million ounces since November 2022[35] - The total international investment assets reached $10.70 trillion, while total liabilities were $7.09 trillion, resulting in a net investment position of $3.61 trillion[39]
2025年Q1跨境资本季度跟踪:货币黄金增长规模创2011年以来的历史记录
Huachuang Securities· 2025-07-18 03:14
Group 1: Cross-Border Capital Flow - In Q1 2025, cross-border capital continued to show a net outflow of $316.7 billion, the highest level since Q1 2021[2] - Domestic capital outflow reached $481.1 billion, marking the highest level since Q1 2021[2] - Foreign capital inflow was $195.4 billion, while foreign capital outflow was $31.0 billion[2] Group 2: Domestic Investment Trends - Domestic securities investment outflow reached $164.5 billion, a record high since 2011[3] - Domestic direct investment outflow was $143.6 billion, the highest since Q1 2021[4] - The increase in domestic capital outflow was driven by investments in overseas stocks and funds through channels like "Hong Kong Stock Connect" and "mutual recognition of funds"[2] Group 3: Trade Credit and Gold Reserves - Trade credit net outflow was $44.2 billion, the highest since Q4 2015[5] - Monetary gold increased by $38.3 billion, setting a record since 2011, with the central bank accumulating a total of 1.126 million ounces of gold since 2022[6]