在双边关系层面，蒙特罗提到，西班牙与中国已建立起长达50余年的互信友好关系。她表示，西班牙若 想实现再工业化、拥抱前沿技术，就必须深化对中国的了解以及合作。同时，鉴于中国市场的庞大规模 和巨大潜力，她认为两国不仅要加强政府间的沟通协作，更应推动西班牙与中国各省份建立直接合作机 制。 蒙特罗表示，从青少年入手促进学术与文化交流同样至关重要。"必须让年轻人认识一个真实的中国， 唯有如此才能实现思维模式的长期转变。"她补充道，公共外交的推进、西班牙与中国多个城市间航空 通达性的提升，都是打破壁垒的有效途径。（作者Yiwen Shan，唐亚译） 面对这一局面，蒙特罗表示，知华讲堂重申致力于提升西班牙乃至欧洲地区对21世纪中国的认识，推动 双方构建基于合作与多边主义的关系。 蒙特罗在采访中说，受所谓的"遏制战略"与虚假宣传的影响，全球北方国家对中国的认知存在偏差。她 认为，欧洲对美国的政策亦步亦趋，尤其是在2022年马德里北约峰会将中国定义为"系统性挑战"之后， 正导致欧洲大陆逐渐丧失战略自主性，同时错失诸多发展机遇。 西班牙知华讲堂网站12月22日文章，原题：玛尔塔·蒙特罗："美国歪曲报道在中国发生的事情" 近期在 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the escalation of U.S. military pressure on Venezuela, with President Trump ordering a comprehensive blockade of sanctioned oil tankers and the deployment of U.S. military forces to Ecuador [1][2] - The U.S. has amassed over 15,000 soldiers, numerous warships, and hundreds of aircraft in the Caribbean, marking the largest military deployment in the region since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis [2][5] - The U.S. military is reviving several military bases in the region, including the Roosevelt Roads Naval Base in Puerto Rico and the Christopher Columbus Military Base in Panama, indicating a strategic shift to enhance military readiness [5][6] Group 2 - The U.S. military's global base network is undergoing a "dynamic adjustment," with upgrades and new bases being sought in various regions, including the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Africa [6][8] - Historical context shows that U.S. overseas military bases have evolved from a focus on North America to a global presence, significantly expanding during World War II and the Cold War [11][12][13] - The presence of U.S. military bases is linked to the country's imperial expansion and military interventionism, providing a foundation for rapid military action and control over regions [10][17] Group 3 - The existence of U.S. military bases often leads to violations of local laws and human rights issues, with numerous incidents reported in host countries, including Japan and South Korea [18][20] - Environmental impacts from U.S. military bases, such as soil and water contamination, noise pollution, and ecological damage, have raised concerns among local populations [20] - The strategic positioning of U.S. bases makes host countries potential targets for attacks, increasing security risks and complicating local geopolitical dynamics [20][21]

Group 1 - The U.S. announced a 25% tariff on South Korean imports starting August 1, which has significant implications for South Korea's economy and its diplomatic relations with the U.S. [1][3] - The tariff is seen as a strategy by the U.S. to pressure South Korean companies to invest more in U.S. manufacturing and to purchase more U.S. energy and agricultural products, aiming to reduce the trade deficit [3][5] - The U.S. is leveraging this tariff to influence South Korea's stance on China, as the new South Korean president, Lee Jae-myung, has expressed intentions to improve relations with China, which contradicts U.S. interests [3][6] Group 2 - South Korea's key industries, including automotive, steel, and semiconductors, are heavily reliant on exports to the U.S., making them particularly vulnerable to the new tariffs [5][6] - The South Korean government faces a dilemma: aligning with U.S. interests could alleviate tariff pressures but would damage relations with China, a crucial trade partner [6][8] - The South Korean administration is actively seeking to negotiate on key security issues, such as wartime operational control, which could provide leverage in discussions with the U.S. regarding tariffs and cooperation against China [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shifting dynamics of global power, particularly focusing on the perceived rise of China and the challenges posed by the U.S. under Trump's administration, suggesting that the century may belong to China if the U.S. does not change its approach [2][24]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article references George Kennan's strategic thought of "containment" during the Cold War, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to counter the expansion of the Soviet Union to maintain global stability and protect American interests [5][7]. - It highlights how U.S. foreign policy has historically been shaped by elite strategists who aimed to create a stable world order led by the U.S., which ultimately succeeded in defeating the Soviet Union [9][10]. Group 2: Current U.S.-China Relations - The article points out that the current U.S.-China relationship is fundamentally different from the U.S.-Soviet relationship, noting the complexity and interdependence of global trade and economic ties between the two nations [23]. - It discusses how the U.S. has increasingly viewed China as a primary adversary, akin to the Soviet Union, particularly after the 2008 financial crisis, with rising anti-China sentiment among U.S. policymakers [12][16]. Group 3: Economic and Social Implications - The article mentions the growing wealth gap in the U.S., where the top 1% now holds over 20% of pre-tax income, contributing to social issues and affecting the U.S.'s international image [24]. - It contrasts the economic conditions of China and the Soviet Union, noting that China's GDP has surpassed that of the U.S. when adjusted for purchasing power parity, indicating a significant shift in global economic power [24].