登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：002717 证券简称：ST岭南（维权） 公告编号：2026-003 岭南生态文旅股份有限公司 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 重要内容提示： 1、案件所处的诉讼阶段：法院已受理，一审中 2、上市公司所处的当事人地位：第三人 3、涉案的金额：11,216.02万元（利息等暂计至2025年10月24日） 4、对上市公司损益产生的影响：目前公司尚未参加案件的开庭审理，尚无法判断作为第三人参加诉讼 对公司的影响。 一、本次诉讼事项受理的基本情况 岭南生态文旅股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"第三人"）近日收到郑州市中级人民法院送达被告的 《民事起诉状》等相关起诉材料，因金融借款合同纠纷，中国信托商业银行股份有限公司广州分行（以 下简称 "原告"）向郑州市中级人民法院提起诉讼。 截至本公告披露日，本案件尚未开庭审理。现将诉讼事项公告如下： 二、本次诉讼案件的基本情况 关于重大诉讼的公告 （一）受理机构：郑州市中级人民法院 原告：中国信托商业银行股份有限公司广州分行 被告：新郑市住房和城乡建设局 ...

本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ●案件所处的诉讼阶段：法院已立案受理，尚未开庭。 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：600265 证券简称：ST景谷 公告编号：2026-001 云南景谷林业股份有限公司 关于公司涉及诉讼的公告 ●上市公司所处的当事人地位：被告。 ●涉案的金额：公司本次收到河北省高碑店市人民法院（以下简称"高碑店法院"）的《民事起诉状》 《应诉通知书》等相关法律文书，涉案金额包括本金14,825万元及相应利息。 ●是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：本次诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，诉讼的结果尚存在不确定性，最 终影响以法院判决为准。 一、本次涉及诉讼的基本情况 2025年11月，云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"景谷林业"）原控股子公司唐县汇银木业 有限公司（以下简称"汇银木业"）收到沧州银行股份有限公司白沟新城支行（以下简称"沧州银行"）发 来的《宣布贷款提前到期通知书》，宣布将汇银木业原定于2026年3月到期的合计人民币14,825万元贷 款于2 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company ST Jinggu has received legal documents from the Gaobeidian Court regarding a financial loan dispute involving its former subsidiary, Huiyin Wood Industry, with a total amount of 148 million yuan in principal and corresponding interest [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit has been initiated by Cangzhou Bank against Huiyin Wood Industry, Cui Huijun, Wang Lanchun, and the company itself [1] - The court has accepted the case and has frozen 51% of the company's shares in Huiyin Wood Industry [1] - The company believes it has no guarantee responsibility in this matter, but the lawsuit has temporarily hindered the registration procedures for significant asset restructuring [1] Group 2 - The company plans to conduct assessments and investigations and will pursue legal avenues to resolve the issue [1] - There is uncertainty regarding the future developments of this case [1]

1月5日金融一线消息，西安银行发布诉讼事项进展公告，披露其咸阳分行作为原告的金融借款合同纠纷 一案已获一审判决，涉案金额包括借款本金7.3亿元及相应利息、复息、罚息等相关费用。 公告显示，该诉讼始于2025年4月17日，西安银行咸阳分行因金融借款合同纠纷，将兴平鸿远发展建设 有限公司、启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司及湖南金沙路桥建设有限公司诉至陕西省咸阳市中级人民法 院，法院已于当日立案受理，相关情况曾于2025年4月19日披露。近日，西安银行收到法院出具的民事 判决书（2025）陕04民初34号，一审判决明确，西安银行咸阳分行与被告鸿远公司签订的《借款合同》 及《借款合同补充协议》于2025年5月8日解除；鸿远公司需在判决生效之日起十五日内支付7.3亿元本 金及相应利息，其中2024年12月21日至2025年5月8日按原合同约定计算，2025年5月9日起至实际清偿之 日按全国银行间同业拆借中心公布的贷款市场报价利率计算；启迪公司对上述债务承担连带责任；西安 银行咸阳分行在债权范围内，对鸿远公司基于《兴平市生态湿地综合项目配套基础设施PPP项目协议》 享有的收益权享有优先受偿权，同时法院驳回了咸阳分行的其他诉讼 ...

12月29日，上海银行发布公告，上海银行深圳分行（以下简称深圳分行）于2025年12月26日收到两份判决书。 此外，深圳分行对宝能地产股份有限公司（以下简称 判决书显示，深圳深业物流集团股份有限公司（以下简称"深业物流"）应于判决发生法律效力之日起十日内向深圳分行偿还借款本金34.772亿元、 38.99亿元及相应的利息、逾期违约金，同时，深业物流应于判决发生法律效力之日起十日内向深圳分行支付律师费合计40万元（20万元+20万 元）。 2018年12月，深圳分行通过认购信托资金向深业物流放款40亿元，到期日为2022年6月17日。担保方式为深业物流提供不动产抵押担保、租金应收 账款质押担保，宝能地产提供不动产抵押担保，宝能控股、姚振华、宝能投资分别提供连带责任保证担保。截至起诉日，深业物流尚欠本金38.99 亿元及利息等。截至起诉日，深业物流尚欠本金38.99亿元及利息等。 然而，两笔借款均出现违约。上海银行曾表示：鉴于深业物流等未履行还本付息或承担担保责任的义务，公司严格按监管规定，已于2021年底将本 次诉讼所涉两笔授信纳入不良。 2024年9月，上海银行发布公告，公司收到收到广东省高级人民法院的《受理 ...

每经编辑｜许绍航 12月29日，上海银行发布公告，上海银行深圳分行（以下简称深圳分行）于2025年12月26日收到两份判决书。 判决书显示，深圳深业物流集团股份有限公司（以下简称"深业物流"）应于判决发生法律效力之日起十日内向深圳分行偿还借款本金34.772亿元、38.99亿 元及相应的利息、逾期违约金，同时，深业物流应于判决发生法律效力之日起十日内向深圳分行支付律师费合计40万元（20万元+20万元）。 此外，深圳分行对宝能地产股份有限公司（以下简称 "宝能地产"）提供的不动产享有抵押权，并有权就处分该抵押物所得价款超出前顺位抵押担保债权的部分优先受偿；宝能地产承担担保责任后，有权向深 业物流追偿。 这意味着，借款超7年、违约分别超4年和3年、立案逾1年后，这两笔巨额借款的追债案，终于迎来一审判决。 据此前公告，2018年9月、10月，深圳分行通过认购信托资金向深业物流分别放款15亿元、23亿元，到期日分别为2021年9月26日、2021年10月18日。担保 方式为深业物流、宝能地产提供不动产抵押担保，宝能置地提供股权质押等担保，宝能投资提供连带责任保证担保。截至起诉日，深业物流尚欠本金 34.772亿元及 ...

瑞茂通公告，公司全资子公司河南瑞茂通粮油有限公司收到河南省郑州市中级人民法院关于公司全资子 公司郑州卓瑞供应链管理有限公司、郑州嘉瑞供应链管理有限公司与河南农村商业银行股份有限公司郑 州中心支行金融借款合同纠纷的应诉通知书等相关材料。2024年-2025年期间，河南农商行分别与郑州 卓瑞、郑州嘉瑞签订《流动资金借款合同》，瑞茂通与河南农商行签订了《保证合同》，河南粮油公司 与河南农商行签订了《共同还款承诺书》。河南农商行于近日向河南省郑州市中级人民法院提起诉讼， 请求判令被告郑州卓瑞归还借款本金2.89亿元人民币以及利息110万元人民币等；被告郑州嘉瑞偿还借 款本金2.09亿元人民币及利息67.66万元人民币等；被告河南粮油公司承担共同还款责任；被告瑞茂通承 担连带保证责任。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company is currently involved in a significant legal case regarding a financial loan dispute with Industrial Bank Co., Ltd. Suzhou Branch, with a first-instance judgment delivered and under appeal [2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The company and its subsidiaries are defendants in a lawsuit concerning a financial loan contract dispute, with the amount involved being 50.3766 million yuan [2]. - The court has ordered the subsidiary, Bangjie New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., to repay the principal of 48.316269 million yuan, along with interest and penalties totaling approximately 1.588 million yuan [3][4]. - The company is liable for joint repayment responsibilities, allowing it to seek reimbursement from its subsidiary after fulfilling its obligations [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The impact of the judgment on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain, pending the outcome of the appeal and subsequent accounting treatments [2][28]. - The company has reported that the frozen bank accounts due to the litigation amount to approximately 1.45924 million yuan, which is only 0.45% of its audited total assets for 2024 [6]. Group 3: Asset Freezing - As of November 25, 2025, several bank accounts and subsidiary shares have been frozen due to ongoing litigation, including 100% of the shares in multiple subsidiaries [7][8]. - The company is actively communicating with relevant parties to resolve disputes and lift the freezing of assets [6]. Group 4: Other Legal Matters - The company has disclosed no other undisclosed litigation or arbitration matters as of November 25, 2025 [5]. - The company is closely monitoring the progress of ongoing cases and will fulfill its information disclosure obligations as required by law [28].

Core Viewpoint - Suzhou Bank is currently involved in a legal dispute where the court has dismissed the plaintiff's case, indicating that the case has not progressed to substantive trial [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Overview - The lawsuit involves Suzhou Bank as one of the defendants in a financial loan contract dispute initiated by Ordos Rural Commercial Bank [3]. - The amount in question is approximately 981.27 million yuan, which includes all litigation costs [2]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings Update - On November 20, 2025, the court allowed Ordos Rural Commercial Bank's branch to replace the original plaintiff in the lawsuit, while dismissing the case against them [4]. - The court's ruling allows for an appeal within ten days if the parties are dissatisfied with the decision [4]. Group 3: Other Legal Matters - As of the announcement date, Suzhou Bank and its subsidiaries are involved in other minor lawsuits related to financial loan contracts, which do not significantly impact the bank's financial status [5]. - There are no undisclosed significant lawsuits or arbitration matters beyond those already reported [6]. Group 4: Impact on Financial Performance - The dismissal of the lawsuit at the first instance introduces uncertainty regarding its potential impact on the bank's current and future profits [7].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Hubei Three Gorges New Material Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a legal dispute concerning a financial loan contract, with an amount of 150 million yuan (approximately 22.5 million USD) at stake, and has filed an appeal against a first-instance judgment [2][3][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The case is currently in the second instance, with the appeal accepted by the Guangdong High People's Court [2]. - The company is the appellant in the case, which involves multiple defendants including Shenzhen Hengbo Commercial Chain Co., Ltd. and several individuals [3][4]. - The original judgment from the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court was issued on November 5, 2025, and the company has filed an appeal against this judgment [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The company has already made provisions for the principal amount of 150 million yuan in 2021, which is expected to minimize the impact of related interest on future profits [2][6]. - The final accounting treatment and impact amount will be confirmed by the registered accountant's audit results [6]. Group 3: Company Actions - The company is actively monitoring the progress of the lawsuit and is taking measures to protect its rights [6]. - The company has committed to timely information disclosure in accordance with relevant regulations [6].