近日，上海市青浦区人民法院出具的一则限制消费令显示，特斯拉"车顶维权"女车主张亚周被法院采取 限制消费措施。原因为张亚周未按执行通知书指定的期间履行生效法律文书确定的给付义务，申请人为 特斯拉（上海）有限公司。案件流程显示，今年8月，张亚周被申请执行约17.23万元。 12月30日，张亚周就此事向南都记者表示，"我也是刚看到这个消息，名誉权的案件，我本人已经向上 海高院申请再审了。" 南都记者注意到，张亚周与特斯拉还有另一起纠纷案件。今年9月，针对张亚周诉特斯拉买卖合同纠纷 一案，北京市大兴区人民法院一审判决责令特斯拉向其提供事故前半小时的完整行车数据。法院认定这 有助于辅助其全面分析涉案车辆该时间段内的整体情况，应当认定为消费者知情权范畴，具有合理性和 必要性。 针对该案，12月30日，张亚周告诉南都记者，"特斯拉方面已经上诉，目前二审正在进行中。等二审判 决结果出来以后，将一并处理。" 12月31日，针对被法院限制高消费一事，特斯拉"车顶维权"当事人张亚周告诉南都N视频记者，"相应 的赔偿款会尽快按程序付给法院。"南都此前报道，今年7月，其与特斯拉的名誉权纠纷案迎来二审判 决，张亚周被法院认定侵犯特斯拉名 ...

近日，特斯拉（上海）有限公司与张亚周名誉权纠纷案有了新进展。据了解，张亚周被限制高消费，申 请人为特斯拉（上海）有限公司。12月30日，张亚周告诉南都N视频记者，"我也是刚看到这个消息， 名誉权的案件，我本人已经向上海高院申请再审了。" 南都此前报道，2021年4月19日，张亚周在上海车展爬上特斯拉车顶大喊"刹车失灵"维权。同年9月，特 斯拉起诉张亚周车顶维权行为侵犯其名誉权，并赔偿因此事给特斯拉造成的直接财产损失"暂计500万 元"。 今年7月，相关案件迎来二审判决，张亚周被法院认定侵犯特斯拉名誉权，应向特斯拉赔礼道歉并赔偿 17万元。 12月30日，张亚周就此事向南都记者表示，"我也是刚看到这个消息，名誉权的案件，我本人已经向上 海高院申请再审了。" 南都记者注意到，张亚周与特斯拉还有另一起纠纷案件。今年9月，针对张亚周诉特斯拉买卖合同纠纷 一案，北京市大兴区人民法院一审判决责令特斯拉向其提供事故前半小时的完整行车数据。法院认定这 有助于辅助其全面分析涉案车辆该时间段内的整体情况，应当认定为消费者知情权范畴，具有合理性和 必要性。 针对该案，12月30日，张亚周告诉南都记者，"特斯拉方面已经上诉，目前二审 ...

就该事件影响，欣旺达在公告中称，截至公告披露日，公司及合并报表范围内子公司生产经营一切正常。本次诉讼尚未开庭审理，后续判决结果存在不 确定性，暂时无法评估对公司本期利润或期后利润的影响。公司将按照企业会计准则规范，结合案件进展情况进行相应的会计处理，最终对公司利润的 影响金额以会计师审计确认后的数据为准。 消息面上，欣旺达上周五晚公布，其全资子公司欣旺达动力科技股份有限公司因买卖合同纠纷被威睿电动汽车技术(宁波)有限公司起诉，涉案金额高达 23.14亿元。 原告方主张，欣旺达动力在2021年6月至2023年12月期间交付的电芯存在严重质量问题，导致其遭受重大经济损失，故提出包括赔偿损失、承担鉴定与律 师费用及全部诉讼费用在内的多项诉求。 格隆汇12月29日｜欣旺达今日盘中一度放量大跌近16%至25元，股价创近4个月新低，目前跌幅收窄至11%以内。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company is currently involved in a significant legal case regarding a financial loan dispute with Industrial Bank Co., Ltd. Suzhou Branch, with a first-instance judgment delivered and under appeal [2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The company and its subsidiaries are defendants in a lawsuit concerning a financial loan contract dispute, with the amount involved being 50.3766 million yuan [2]. - The court has ordered the subsidiary, Bangjie New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., to repay the principal of 48.316269 million yuan, along with interest and penalties totaling approximately 1.588 million yuan [3][4]. - The company is liable for joint repayment responsibilities, allowing it to seek reimbursement from its subsidiary after fulfilling its obligations [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The impact of the judgment on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain, pending the outcome of the appeal and subsequent accounting treatments [2][28]. - The company has reported that the frozen bank accounts due to the litigation amount to approximately 1.45924 million yuan, which is only 0.45% of its audited total assets for 2024 [6]. Group 3: Asset Freezing - As of November 25, 2025, several bank accounts and subsidiary shares have been frozen due to ongoing litigation, including 100% of the shares in multiple subsidiaries [7][8]. - The company is actively communicating with relevant parties to resolve disputes and lift the freezing of assets [6]. Group 4: Other Legal Matters - The company has disclosed no other undisclosed litigation or arbitration matters as of November 25, 2025 [5]. - The company is closely monitoring the progress of ongoing cases and will fulfill its information disclosure obligations as required by law [28].

Core Viewpoint - Longzhou Co., Ltd. (龙洲股份) announced two significant lawsuits involving its subsidiary Dongguan Zhongqi Hongyuan Automobile Co., Ltd. (中汽宏远) due to contract disputes related to electric bus battery failures, with total claims amounting to approximately 431 million yuan [1][5][9]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuits involve Dongguan Buses Co., Ltd. and Dongguan City Bus Transportation Co., Ltd. as plaintiffs, with claims of 205 million yuan and 226 million yuan respectively [5]. - The core issue stems from battery failures in electric buses sold by Zhongqi Hongyuan in 2018, which led to operational disruptions starting in 2021 [7][8]. - The plaintiffs are seeking compensation for losses due to vehicle downtime, attorney fees, and other related costs, with a total claim amount of approximately 431 million yuan [5][8]. Group 2: Company Background and Financial Impact - Longzhou Co., Ltd. has faced financial difficulties, reporting net losses of 79.23 million yuan, 352 million yuan, and 348 million yuan from 2022 to 2024 [15]. - The company reported a revenue decline of 26.61% year-on-year for the first three quarters of 2025, with a net profit attributable to shareholders of -95.64 million yuan [18]. - As of November 25, 2023, Longzhou's stock price increased by 2.76%, with a total market capitalization of approximately 3.144 billion yuan, reflecting a year-to-date increase of over 32% [18].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the ongoing litigation and arbitration matters involving Chongqing Sifang New Materials Co., Ltd., highlighting the financial implications and the company's legal actions against a contractor for unpaid debts [2][6][8]. Summary by Sections Litigation Overview - The company has initiated a lawsuit against Chongqing Construction First Municipal Engineering Co., Ltd. for a total overdue payment of 9,506,335.74 yuan related to a materials procurement contract [3][5][6]. - As of April 1, 2025, the company has faced a total of 84 litigation and arbitration cases, with a cumulative amount of 221,590,539.49 yuan involved [2][11]. Financial Impact - The total amount involved in the current litigation is 9,791,525.81 yuan, which includes the overdue payment and associated costs [7][10]. - The ongoing litigation may have uncertain impacts on the company's current and future profits, as the outcomes of the cases are still pending [2][8]. Case Details - The company supplied concrete to the contractor under a contract signed on September 14, 2022, with a total invoiced amount of 24,593,357.98 yuan, of which only 15,087,022.24 yuan has been paid [4][5]. - A mediation agreement was reached on May 27, 2025, stipulating that the contractor must pay the remaining amount in five installments by September 30, 2025 [8]. Additional Litigation - From April 1, 2025, to September 2, 2025, the company has reported an additional 56 litigation and arbitration cases, totaling 225,502,386.82 yuan, with 36 new cases reported after September 2, 2025, amounting to 9,310.33 million yuan [11].

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Yilida Wind Power Co., Ltd. (Yilida) has received a final civil judgment from the Hefei Intermediate People's Court regarding a contract dispute with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (Jianghuai Automobile) [1][2] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - In January 2022, Jianghuai Automobile filed a lawsuit against Yilida and its subsidiary, Iron City Information Technology Co., Ltd., leading to the freezing of a total of 13.88 million yuan in bank accounts [1] - The first-instance judgment required Iron City Information to pay Jianghuai Automobile a compensation of 3,680,904.28 yuan plus interest, while rejecting other claims from Jianghuai Automobile and Iron City's counterclaims [2] - The Hefei Intermediate People's Court upheld the first-instance judgment on October 13, 2025, making it a final ruling [2] Group 2: Financial Impact - Yilida indicated that the judgment will have a certain impact on the company's current and future profits, with the final effect to be determined by the annual audit results from the accounting firm [2]

Group 1: Share Buyback Progress - The company approved the fifth share buyback plan on June 11 and July 1, 2025, allowing for a buyback price not exceeding RMB 13.88 per share, with total funds between RMB 10 million and RMB 20 million [2] - As of September 30, 2025, the company has repurchased 966,849 shares, accounting for 0.61% of the total share capital, with a total expenditure of RMB 10,449,243.15 [3] - The repurchased shares will be used for employee stock ownership plans or equity incentives, and any unutilized shares within three years will be canceled [6] Group 2: Litigation Announcement - The company has initiated a lawsuit against Zhejiang Gepai Cobalt Industry New Materials Co., Ltd. for a breach of contract, seeking the return of RMB 39 million plus interest and penalties [9][10] - The lawsuit is currently in the acceptance stage and has not yet gone to trial, with the company positioned as the plaintiff [9][10] - The outcome of the lawsuit is uncertain, but it is stated that it will not affect the company's normal operations [9][10]

Group 1 - The company has announced that some of its bank accounts have been frozen by the Kunming City Guandu District People's Court due to a contractual dispute with Suzhou Mingzhi Technology Co., Ltd [1][2] - The total amount frozen is 36 million yuan, which represents 1.89% of the company's most recent audited cash funds and 2.19% of its most recent audited net assets, indicating that the impact is relatively minor [2] - The company confirms that its production and operations are continuing normally and that the frozen accounts do not affect its daily operations, as they are not the main accounts [2] Group 2 - The freezing of the accounts is a procedural measure in the normal litigation process and does not represent a judgment on the substantive rights and obligations of the parties involved [2] - The dispute arises from a purchase agreement for D series engine aluminum alloy cylinder head products, where the parties have not reached an agreement on warranty claim costs despite multiple communications [2] - The company plans to actively respond to the lawsuit and assert its legal rights through counterclaims, aiming to resolve the account freeze as soon as possible [2]

Group 1 - The latest development regarding the judicial auction of shares held by the controlling shareholder and actual controller of Spring兴精工, Sun Jiexiao, has been reported. The auction for 154 million shares and 15.535 million shares, which are currently under judicial freeze, took place from July 28 to July 29, 2025, but went unsold due to no bids being placed [1] - As of the announcement date, Sun Jiexiao and her concerted party, Yuan Jing, collectively hold 335 million shares, accounting for 29.66% of the company's total equity. Among these, 319 million shares are pledged, representing 95.36% of their holdings and 28.28% of the total equity. Additionally, 304 million shares are under judicial freeze, making up 90.73% of their holdings and 26.91% of the total equity [1] - The company stated that the failure of the judicial auction will not have a significant adverse impact on its production and operations. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the relevant court will continue to execute other judicial procedures, which could lead to risks such as forced transfer or judicial auction of shares, potentially affecting the stability of the company's control [1] Group 2 - Spring兴精工 previously disclosed that as of June 28, Suzhou Industrial Park Kahn Lian Technology Co., Ltd. owes the company 316 million yuan in equity transfer payments, while Huizhou Zehong Technology Co., Ltd. owes 80.925 million yuan in business-related payments, totaling 397 million yuan. Sun Jiexiao, as the actual controller of Suzhou Industrial Park Kahn Lian Technology Co., Ltd., bears joint guarantee responsibility for these payments [2] - The company has issued a performance forecast indicating that it expects a negative net profit for the first half of 2025. This is attributed to the ongoing ramp-up of production capacity in its new energy vehicle components business, which has not yet reached an ideal state, thus impacting operational performance [2] - Additionally, Chongqing Xinrunxing Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against the subsidiary Huizhou Spring兴精工 due to a sales contract dispute, with the amount in question being 38 million yuan. As of now, the case has not yet been heard. Based on the principle of accounting prudence, Huizhou Spring兴精工 plans to recognize a provision for expected liabilities amounting to 21 million yuan [2]