登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 股票简称：ST云动 股票代码：000903 编号：2025一046号 昆明云内动力股份有限公司 关于部分银行账户资金被冻结的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 昆明云内动力股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于近日获悉，公司部分银行账户资金被云南省昆明市官 渡区人民法院冻结，现将有关情况公告如下： 一、公司部分银行账户被冻结的基本情况 ■ 三、账户冻结对公司的影响及解决措施 1、公司上述被冻结银行账户涉及资金共计3,600.00万元，占公司最近一期经审计货币资金的1.89%，占 公司最近一期经审计净资产的2.19%，冻结金额占比较小。后续，公司将根据本次案件进展及法院判决 情况依据会计准则进行相关会计处理。 2、截至本公告披露日，公司生产经营正常有序开展，上述账户资金被冻结不会影响公司日常生产经 营，不属于公司主要账户被冻结的情形，未触及《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》第9.8.1条第（六）项 规定的情形。 3、该项保全措施系正常诉讼过程中的程序性措施，并非为法院对当事人实体权利义务的裁判。公司与 ...

Group 1 - The company has announced that part of its bank account funds has been frozen, amounting to 8,037,518.48 yuan, which is approximately 1.25% of its latest audited net assets [1][2] - The freezing of funds is due to a contractual dispute with Chongqing Turbine Factory Co., Ltd. regarding a joint bid for the India FFC flood irrigation project, leading to a lawsuit and pre-litigation asset preservation [2] - The frozen amount represents 11.21% of the company's latest unaudited consolidated cash balance as of March 31, 2025 [2] Group 2 - The company states that the remaining funds in the account can still be used normally, and the freezing of part of the funds will not significantly impact its production and operational activities [2] - The actual impact on the company's financial performance remains uncertain and will depend on the final outcome of the litigation [2] - The company will closely monitor the situation and actively communicate with relevant parties to resolve the asset preservation issue and protect the rights of the company and its shareholders [2]

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit against Spring兴精工 is primarily due to a payment dispute regarding a machine tool purchase, with the plaintiff claiming that the company owes a significant amount of money for goods delivered [2][3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Spring兴精工's subsidiary, 惠州春兴, purchased machine tools from 重庆新润 for a total of 40 million yuan in September 2020, with payment due by October 2021 [3][4]. - 重庆新润 claims that 惠州春兴 has not paid 37.8 million yuan of the principal amount, constituting a breach of contract [4]. - The contract stipulated that 20% of the total price (8 million yuan) should be paid upon signing, with the remaining 80% to be paid over 12 months, raising questions about the payment history [4][5]. Group 2: Company Response and Impact - Spring兴精工 has stated that the lawsuit is based on the plaintiff's claims and has not yet undergone judicial review, indicating that the company is closely monitoring the situation [2][5]. - The company has not confirmed the specifics of the payment delays or the reasons behind them, emphasizing that the lawsuit has not significantly impacted its operations to date [5]. - If the lawsuit results in a loss for Spring兴精工, the company will assess the financial implications according to accounting standards and disclose necessary information [5]. Group 3: Management Changes - Recently, Spring兴精工 experienced a resignation of a senior executive, 董作田, who held multiple key positions, citing personal reasons [6][7]. - The company has not yet appointed a new financial director following this resignation, but it asserts that the transition will not affect its operations [7]. - Previous management changes occurred at the end of last year, indicating a pattern of personnel adjustments within the company [7].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiejia Weichuang, announced that part of its bank account funds amounting to 312 million yuan have been frozen due to two contract disputes with Shenzhen Ruitai Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. and East China Optical Technology (Xuzhou) Co., Ltd. [1][2] Group 1 - The frozen funds of 312 million yuan account for 2.82% of the company's latest audited net assets and 5.03% of its cash balance of 6.217 billion yuan as of March 31 [2] - The company stated that the freezing of funds will not significantly impact its cash flow or daily operations, as the remaining funds in the account and other bank accounts are sufficient [2] - The disputes with East China Optical involve a total litigation amount of 208 million yuan, with the lawsuits currently pending [3] Group 2 - The company has initiated four lawsuits against East China Optical and its subsidiaries, while East China Optical has also filed a lawsuit against the company for issues related to equipment delivery and compliance with technical agreements, totaling 588 million yuan [3][4] - The court has frozen an additional 310 million yuan of the company's funds based on a request from East China Optical [4]