每经编辑｜程鹏 11月25日晚间，龙洲股份(002682)发布两则公告，披露其控股孙公司东莞中汽宏远汽车有限公司（下称"中汽宏远"）因买卖合同纠纷涉两起重大诉讼，案 件均已由东莞市第一人民法院立案，目前处于一审待判决阶段。 中汽宏远为两起诉讼的被告方，原告分别为东莞巴士有限公司、东莞市城巴运输有限公司，两案涉案金额分别为2.05亿元、2.26亿元，合计涉案金额约 4.31亿元。 官网资料显示，东莞巴士有限公司是以经营地面公共交通为主的大型国有独资企业，负责除水乡片区以外东莞市28个镇街的公交运营服务，也是东莞规模 最大的公交企业。2014年9月25日开通首条公交线路，经过全市两轮公交资源整合，截至2024年6月底拥有339条线路、5311辆运营车辆。东莞市城巴运输 有限公司则是由东莞巴士有限公司100%控股的子公司。 两起诉讼的核心起因均为2018年中汽宏远对外销售的纯电动公交车动力电池故障问题。 事情源于2018年10月，原告东莞巴士有限公司、东莞市城巴运输有限公司均通过公开招标方式，分别向被告中汽宏远采购配置锰酸锂动力电池的纯电动公 交车250辆、422辆，生产厂家为微宏动力系统（湖州）有限公司（下称"微 ...

Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the ongoing litigation and arbitration matters involving Chongqing Sifang New Materials Co., Ltd., highlighting the financial implications and the company's legal actions against a contractor for unpaid debts [2][6][8]. Summary by Sections Litigation Overview - The company has initiated a lawsuit against Chongqing Construction First Municipal Engineering Co., Ltd. for a total overdue payment of 9,506,335.74 yuan related to a materials procurement contract [3][5][6]. - As of April 1, 2025, the company has faced a total of 84 litigation and arbitration cases, with a cumulative amount of 221,590,539.49 yuan involved [2][11]. Financial Impact - The total amount involved in the current litigation is 9,791,525.81 yuan, which includes the overdue payment and associated costs [7][10]. - The ongoing litigation may have uncertain impacts on the company's current and future profits, as the outcomes of the cases are still pending [2][8]. Case Details - The company supplied concrete to the contractor under a contract signed on September 14, 2022, with a total invoiced amount of 24,593,357.98 yuan, of which only 15,087,022.24 yuan has been paid [4][5]. - A mediation agreement was reached on May 27, 2025, stipulating that the contractor must pay the remaining amount in five installments by September 30, 2025 [8]. Additional Litigation - From April 1, 2025, to September 2, 2025, the company has reported an additional 56 litigation and arbitration cases, totaling 225,502,386.82 yuan, with 36 new cases reported after September 2, 2025, amounting to 9,310.33 million yuan [11].

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Yilida Wind Power Co., Ltd. (Yilida) has received a final civil judgment from the Hefei Intermediate People's Court regarding a contract dispute with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (Jianghuai Automobile) [1][2] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - In January 2022, Jianghuai Automobile filed a lawsuit against Yilida and its subsidiary, Iron City Information Technology Co., Ltd., leading to the freezing of a total of 13.88 million yuan in bank accounts [1] - The first-instance judgment required Iron City Information to pay Jianghuai Automobile a compensation of 3,680,904.28 yuan plus interest, while rejecting other claims from Jianghuai Automobile and Iron City's counterclaims [2] - The Hefei Intermediate People's Court upheld the first-instance judgment on October 13, 2025, making it a final ruling [2] Group 2: Financial Impact - Yilida indicated that the judgment will have a certain impact on the company's current and future profits, with the final effect to be determined by the annual audit results from the accounting firm [2]

Group 1: Share Buyback Progress - The company approved the fifth share buyback plan on June 11 and July 1, 2025, allowing for a buyback price not exceeding RMB 13.88 per share, with total funds between RMB 10 million and RMB 20 million [2] - As of September 30, 2025, the company has repurchased 966,849 shares, accounting for 0.61% of the total share capital, with a total expenditure of RMB 10,449,243.15 [3] - The repurchased shares will be used for employee stock ownership plans or equity incentives, and any unutilized shares within three years will be canceled [6] Group 2: Litigation Announcement - The company has initiated a lawsuit against Zhejiang Gepai Cobalt Industry New Materials Co., Ltd. for a breach of contract, seeking the return of RMB 39 million plus interest and penalties [9][10] - The lawsuit is currently in the acceptance stage and has not yet gone to trial, with the company positioned as the plaintiff [9][10] - The outcome of the lawsuit is uncertain, but it is stated that it will not affect the company's normal operations [9][10]

Group 1 - The company has announced that some of its bank accounts have been frozen by the Kunming City Guandu District People's Court due to a contractual dispute with Suzhou Mingzhi Technology Co., Ltd [1][2] - The total amount frozen is 36 million yuan, which represents 1.89% of the company's most recent audited cash funds and 2.19% of its most recent audited net assets, indicating that the impact is relatively minor [2] - The company confirms that its production and operations are continuing normally and that the frozen accounts do not affect its daily operations, as they are not the main accounts [2] Group 2 - The freezing of the accounts is a procedural measure in the normal litigation process and does not represent a judgment on the substantive rights and obligations of the parties involved [2] - The dispute arises from a purchase agreement for D series engine aluminum alloy cylinder head products, where the parties have not reached an agreement on warranty claim costs despite multiple communications [2] - The company plans to actively respond to the lawsuit and assert its legal rights through counterclaims, aiming to resolve the account freeze as soon as possible [2]

Group 1 - The latest development regarding the judicial auction of shares held by the controlling shareholder and actual controller of Spring兴精工, Sun Jiexiao, has been reported. The auction for 154 million shares and 15.535 million shares, which are currently under judicial freeze, took place from July 28 to July 29, 2025, but went unsold due to no bids being placed [1] - As of the announcement date, Sun Jiexiao and her concerted party, Yuan Jing, collectively hold 335 million shares, accounting for 29.66% of the company's total equity. Among these, 319 million shares are pledged, representing 95.36% of their holdings and 28.28% of the total equity. Additionally, 304 million shares are under judicial freeze, making up 90.73% of their holdings and 26.91% of the total equity [1] - The company stated that the failure of the judicial auction will not have a significant adverse impact on its production and operations. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the relevant court will continue to execute other judicial procedures, which could lead to risks such as forced transfer or judicial auction of shares, potentially affecting the stability of the company's control [1] Group 2 - Spring兴精工 previously disclosed that as of June 28, Suzhou Industrial Park Kahn Lian Technology Co., Ltd. owes the company 316 million yuan in equity transfer payments, while Huizhou Zehong Technology Co., Ltd. owes 80.925 million yuan in business-related payments, totaling 397 million yuan. Sun Jiexiao, as the actual controller of Suzhou Industrial Park Kahn Lian Technology Co., Ltd., bears joint guarantee responsibility for these payments [2] - The company has issued a performance forecast indicating that it expects a negative net profit for the first half of 2025. This is attributed to the ongoing ramp-up of production capacity in its new energy vehicle components business, which has not yet reached an ideal state, thus impacting operational performance [2] - Additionally, Chongqing Xinrunxing Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against the subsidiary Huizhou Spring兴精工 due to a sales contract dispute, with the amount in question being 38 million yuan. As of now, the case has not yet been heard. Based on the principle of accounting prudence, Huizhou Spring兴精工 plans to recognize a provision for expected liabilities amounting to 21 million yuan [2]

Group 1 - The company has announced that part of its bank account funds has been frozen, amounting to 8,037,518.48 yuan, which is approximately 1.25% of its latest audited net assets [1][2] - The freezing of funds is due to a contractual dispute with Chongqing Turbine Factory Co., Ltd. regarding a joint bid for the India FFC flood irrigation project, leading to a lawsuit and pre-litigation asset preservation [2] - The frozen amount represents 11.21% of the company's latest unaudited consolidated cash balance as of March 31, 2025 [2] Group 2 - The company states that the remaining funds in the account can still be used normally, and the freezing of part of the funds will not significantly impact its production and operational activities [2] - The actual impact on the company's financial performance remains uncertain and will depend on the final outcome of the litigation [2] - The company will closely monitor the situation and actively communicate with relevant parties to resolve the asset preservation issue and protect the rights of the company and its shareholders [2]

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit against Spring兴精工 is primarily due to a payment dispute regarding a machine tool purchase, with the plaintiff claiming that the company owes a significant amount of money for goods delivered [2][3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Spring兴精工's subsidiary, 惠州春兴, purchased machine tools from 重庆新润 for a total of 40 million yuan in September 2020, with payment due by October 2021 [3][4]. - 重庆新润 claims that 惠州春兴 has not paid 37.8 million yuan of the principal amount, constituting a breach of contract [4]. - The contract stipulated that 20% of the total price (8 million yuan) should be paid upon signing, with the remaining 80% to be paid over 12 months, raising questions about the payment history [4][5]. Group 2: Company Response and Impact - Spring兴精工 has stated that the lawsuit is based on the plaintiff's claims and has not yet undergone judicial review, indicating that the company is closely monitoring the situation [2][5]. - The company has not confirmed the specifics of the payment delays or the reasons behind them, emphasizing that the lawsuit has not significantly impacted its operations to date [5]. - If the lawsuit results in a loss for Spring兴精工, the company will assess the financial implications according to accounting standards and disclose necessary information [5]. Group 3: Management Changes - Recently, Spring兴精工 experienced a resignation of a senior executive, 董作田, who held multiple key positions, citing personal reasons [6][7]. - The company has not yet appointed a new financial director following this resignation, but it asserts that the transition will not affect its operations [7]. - Previous management changes occurred at the end of last year, indicating a pattern of personnel adjustments within the company [7].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiejia Weichuang, announced that part of its bank account funds amounting to 312 million yuan have been frozen due to two contract disputes with Shenzhen Ruitai Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. and East China Optical Technology (Xuzhou) Co., Ltd. [1][2] Group 1 - The frozen funds of 312 million yuan account for 2.82% of the company's latest audited net assets and 5.03% of its cash balance of 6.217 billion yuan as of March 31 [2] - The company stated that the freezing of funds will not significantly impact its cash flow or daily operations, as the remaining funds in the account and other bank accounts are sufficient [2] - The disputes with East China Optical involve a total litigation amount of 208 million yuan, with the lawsuits currently pending [3] Group 2 - The company has initiated four lawsuits against East China Optical and its subsidiaries, while East China Optical has also filed a lawsuit against the company for issues related to equipment delivery and compliance with technical agreements, totaling 588 million yuan [3][4] - The court has frozen an additional 310 million yuan of the company's funds based on a request from East China Optical [4]