12月18日，中国科学院院士、中国科学院原院长白春礼在"《财经》年会2026：预测与战略暨2025全球 财富管理论坛"上表示，随着科学与技术边界加速融合，产业迭代周期显著缩短，技术路线快速演进， 国际竞争明显前移，基础研究越来越成为产业竞争的"先手棋"，越来越成为国家竞争力的"源头工程"。 12月18日，中国科学院院士、中国科学院原院长白春礼在"《财经》年会2026：预测与战略暨2025 全球财富管理论坛"上表示，随着科学与技术边界加速融合，产业迭代周期显著缩短，技术路线快速 演进，国际竞争明显前移，基础研究越来越成为产业竞争的"先手棋"，越来越成为国家竞争力的"源 头工程"。 白春礼表示，企业在国家创新体系中的角色正在升级。企业是技术创新决策、研发投入、成果转化 与产业化应用的主体，也是最贴近真实需求、真实场景、真实成本边界的主体。更重要的是，企业 正在"变强"，而且在一些前沿领域呈现出对科学界的超越。这不仅体现在资金体量，更体现在算 力、数据、工程平台与人才集聚能力。 为更好推动企业开展基础研究，白春礼建议，完善可兑现的激励与风险分担机制，让长期投入形成 长期回报。要优化财税激励政策，提高对基础研究投入的 ...

（责任编辑：王治强 HF013） 人民财讯12月18日电，12月18日，中国科学院院士、中国科学院原院长白春礼在《财经》年会 2026：预测与战略暨2025全球财富管理论坛上表示，企业基础研究要成为国家创新体系的关键支柱，还 需要在投入结构优化、风险共担机制、评价导向调整和平台支撑体系等方面形成更强合力。 白春礼建议，完善可兑现的激励与风险分担机制，让长期投入形成长期回报。要优化财税激励政 策，提高对基础研究投入的支持力度和精准度，探索对重大原则性的突破实行后补助奖励与持续激励。 要发展耐心资本，健全风险补偿机制，推动国有资本和社会资本优势互补，风险共担、收益共享，为企 业开展长周期研究，提供稳定资金来源和制度保障。 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com ...

Group 1: Common Option Structures - The three common option structures—Snowball, Phoenix, and Fixed Coupon Notes (FCN)—are essentially barrier options, with specific characteristics regarding cash flow and risk exposure [2][3]. - The classic Snowball structure allows for cash flow only at maturity or upon knock-out, while the Phoenix structure enables monthly cash flow as long as the price is above the knock-in line [2]. - FCN provides fixed coupon payments regardless of price movements during the holding period, making it attractive for conservative investors due to a significantly lower probability of knock-in [2]. Group 2: Profit and Loss Scenarios - In scenarios without knock-in, all three structures yield similar returns, with higher coupon structures being more favorable [3]. - In cases where knock-in occurs but knock-out does not, Snowball and FCN can still yield returns, while Phoenix's cash flow is affected by the knock-in event [3]. - If knock-in occurs and the asset price is below the exercise price at maturity, losses may occur, with Snowball being the most adversely affected due to no cash flow during the holding period [3]. Group 3: Risk and Return Dynamics - The risk-return relationship indicates that Phoenix typically offers lower coupons than Snowball, while FCN generally has the lowest coupon rates [4]. Group 4: Market Timing Considerations - Proper market timing is essential, as no option structure guarantees profit in all market conditions [5]. Group 5: Delta and Volatility Analysis - All three structures maintain a positive Delta, indicating a bullish stance on the underlying asset, and are more suitable for moderate upward or sideways markets [7]. - The expected volatility is positively correlated with coupon rates, as higher volatility increases the likelihood of reaching knock-in conditions [8]. - The structures tend to be short volatility in most scenarios, making high volatility periods favorable for entry [10]. Group 6: Selection of Underlying Assets - The choice of underlying assets significantly impacts the performance of the structured products, with the China Securities 500 Index being identified as a suitable candidate due to its risk-return profile [14][16]. - The analysis of daily return distributions shows that the Hang Seng Tech Index has the lowest probability of extreme negative returns, making it a favorable option [14][15]. Group 7: Historical Backtesting and Timing Strategies - Historical backtesting indicates that FCN can effectively mitigate knock-in losses, making it a lower-risk option compared to Snowball [16]. - Rational timing strategies suggest that selecting more aggressive structures during low-risk periods and conservative structures during higher-risk periods can optimize returns [16]. Group 8: Structural Variations and Adjustments - The flexibility in setting barriers allows for various structural adjustments to balance risk and return, such as eliminating knock-in features or adjusting the knock-out thresholds [19].