内蒙古自治区扎兰屯市检察院检察官在集市向群众普法。 "大姐，买生鲜肉记得先看看有没有蓝色的检疫合格章，检验安全的咱吃着才安心！"寒风虽料峭，岁暖 初春来，内蒙古自治区扎兰屯市大河湾镇乡村大集上的吆喝声，一声高过一声，扎兰屯市检察院的"法 宣"小摊儿也在其中。"食药安全益路行，法治护航过新春"普法活动正在这里火热开展，引得赶集的群 众纷纷驻足。 这场新春大集上的普法，源于该院开展的"食药安全益路行"乡村食品安全专项治理活动。2025年7月， 该院检察官走访发现，部分乡镇大集、超市里售卖的散装食品，存在未标明食品名称、生产日期，或生 产批号、保质期等标识不规范等问题，损害社会公共利益。 于是，扎兰屯市检察院对此立案调查。该院"塞外益检"公益诉讼办案团队对该市4个乡镇生鲜食品超市 进行逐家摸排走访，发现散装食品销售不规范商家10个，遂依法向行政机关制发检察建议，督促其切实 履行监管职责，整治不规范问题。 收到检察建议后，行政机关主动与检察机关沟通排查整改相关事宜，并于2025年9月部署开展"乡镇散装 食品专项整治行动"，同步推进常态化监管治理，对售卖不规范散装食品违法案件立案查处10件，并将 行政处罚结果抄送至检察 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate is set to enhance its efforts in public interest litigation, aiming for legislative improvements and increased efficiency in case handling by 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative and Structural Developments - In 2026, the Public Interest Litigation Procuratorate will focus on legislative initiatives, including the modification of the "People's Procuratorate Public Interest Litigation Case Handling Rules" and related judicial interpretations [1]. - The draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law was submitted for initial review by the National People's Congress in October 2025, with public feedback being solicited [1]. Group 2: Case Handling Statistics - Since the pilot program began in 2015 until November 2025, over 1.243 million public interest litigation cases have been filed, with 1.119 million being administrative cases and approximately 124,000 civil cases [2]. - In the first 11 months of 2025, 129,000 public interest litigation cases were handled, with administrative cases making up 91.7% and civil cases 8.3% [2]. - The issuance of procuratorial suggestions reached 77,000, with a response and rectification rate of 97.3% [2]. Group 3: Focus Areas for 2026 - The Public Interest Litigation Procuratorate will prioritize environmental issues, including water pollution and illegal waste dumping, through targeted litigation efforts [3]. - Initiatives will also focus on food and drug safety, as well as the protection of specific vulnerable groups in the public interest litigation domain [3]. - The agency plans to enhance oversight in tax regulation for retail oil enterprises and protect state assets and cultural heritage through specialized litigation actions [3]. Group 4: Quality and Management Improvements - A special quality survey will be conducted in 2026 to address unclear boundaries in the performance of duties related to public interest litigation, focusing on key elements such as case filing and investigation [4].

日前，最高人民检察院举行新闻发布会，通报"食药安全益路行"（下称"益路行"）检察公益诉讼监督主 要情况和成效，并公布了6起典型案例。 发布会的数据显示，2025年1至11月，全国检察机关共立案办理食药安全领域公益诉讼案件24029件，占 公益诉讼案件总数的19%，对保障公众食药安全起到了重要作用。 充分发挥好公益诉讼功能，还需要进一步完善立法、进一步明确重点、进一步增强科技赋能，做到线索 更精准、取证更扎实、起诉更有力、促进整改更有效。 公益诉讼是检察机关针对损害社会公共利益行为提起的诉讼，检察机关作为"原告"身份出现。因为公众 个体并不是诉讼的当事人，所以不是十分了解。简单说，个体提起的诉讼维护的是个体权益，公益诉讼 维护的是公众权益，在维护权益方面起着"润物细无声"的作用，但意义重大。 比如，在"益路行"期间，检察机关对食品非法添加、食用农产品安全、互联网新业态食品药品安全、预 制菜问题整治、特定场所餐饮安全、违规销售处方药及禁售药、医疗器械安全、社区医院及村镇卫生所 违规经营等开展重点监督，制发检察建议7.7万余件，向法院提起诉讼6595件，99.8%得到裁判支持。 公益诉讼的另外一个优势是解决监管部门 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes that community group buying platforms must adhere to civil law and commercial regulations, and should be held accountable for consumer rights violations, advocating for civil public interest litigation to ensure compliance and consumer protection [1]. Group 1: Community Group Buying and Legal Responsibility - Community group buying platforms are currently facing challenges in controlling the quality of fresh food, leading to consumer complaints and difficulties in seeking redress [1]. - The platforms often evade civil legal responsibilities by using standard contract clauses to transfer obligations to offline suppliers, creating a barrier for consumers to assert their rights [1]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has initiated 93 civil public interest litigations against related platform violations and has published 89 announcements urging platforms to amend illegal contract clauses [1]. Group 2: Food and Drug Safety Supervision - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has highlighted several typical cases addressing food and drug safety issues, focusing on key scenarios from offline to online and urban to rural areas [2]. - Specific cases include the supervision of local restaurants for illegal additive use, oversight of online pre-prepared meal safety, and efforts to ensure food safety in local markets benefiting over 20 million people [2]. - The Procuratorate plans to deepen the "Food and Drug Safety Benefit Journey" public interest litigation supervision activity, aiming for precision, quality, and effectiveness in its initiatives by 2025 [2].

Group 1 - The article discusses various administrative public interest litigation cases aimed at improving food and drug safety across different regions in China [1][6][25] - The cases highlight the role of public prosecutors in addressing food safety issues, including unsafe drinking water, counterfeit products, and improper use of food additives [1][6][25] - The article emphasizes the importance of collaboration between public prosecutors and administrative agencies to ensure compliance with food safety regulations and protect public health [1][6][25] Group 2 - In Chongqing, the public prosecutor's office initiated litigation to address unsafe drinking water in rural areas, leading to the implementation of corrective measures by local authorities [2][3][5] - In Hunan, a civil public interest lawsuit was filed against individuals for producing and selling counterfeit "Anhua Black Tea," highlighting the need for strict enforcement of food safety laws [6][7][12] - The Beijing Railway Transport Prosecutor's Office utilized big data to uncover illegal online sales of banned drugs, demonstrating innovative approaches to regulatory oversight [13][14][18] Group 3 - The Yunnan case focused on the regulation of pre-prepared dishes in online food services, addressing issues of mislabeling and inadequate food safety practices [19][20][22] - In Hainan, the prosecution addressed illegal food additive use in "Old Dad Tea" establishments, emphasizing the need for regulatory compliance in traditional food practices [25][26][30] - The case in Henan highlighted the importance of ensuring food safety in agricultural wholesale markets, with prosecutors advocating for improved oversight and compliance measures [32][33][36]