Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate is set to enhance its efforts in public interest litigation, aiming for legislative improvements and increased efficiency in case handling by 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative and Structural Developments - In 2026, the Public Interest Litigation Procuratorate will focus on legislative initiatives, including the modification of the "People's Procuratorate Public Interest Litigation Case Handling Rules" and related judicial interpretations [1]. - The draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law was submitted for initial review by the National People's Congress in October 2025, with public feedback being solicited [1]. Group 2: Case Handling Statistics - Since the pilot program began in 2015 until November 2025, over 1.243 million public interest litigation cases have been filed, with 1.119 million being administrative cases and approximately 124,000 civil cases [2]. - In the first 11 months of 2025, 129,000 public interest litigation cases were handled, with administrative cases making up 91.7% and civil cases 8.3% [2]. - The issuance of procuratorial suggestions reached 77,000, with a response and rectification rate of 97.3% [2]. Group 3: Focus Areas for 2026 - The Public Interest Litigation Procuratorate will prioritize environmental issues, including water pollution and illegal waste dumping, through targeted litigation efforts [3]. - Initiatives will also focus on food and drug safety, as well as the protection of specific vulnerable groups in the public interest litigation domain [3]. - The agency plans to enhance oversight in tax regulation for retail oil enterprises and protect state assets and cultural heritage through specialized litigation actions [3]. Group 4: Quality and Management Improvements - A special quality survey will be conducted in 2026 to address unclear boundaries in the performance of duties related to public interest litigation, focusing on key elements such as case filing and investigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, the People's Courts have effectively utilized their adjudicative functions, concluding 1.192 million first-instance environmental resource cases, a decrease of 4.3% compared to the previous five years, indicating significant progress in ecological civilization construction and environmental governance [3] Group 1: Environmental Protection and Governance - The courts have adjudicated 29,000 first-instance cases related to environmental pollution prevention, with a 30.8% decrease in case filings in 2025 compared to 2021, supporting the goal of achieving clearer skies, greener lands, and cleaner waters [3] - The number of first-instance criminal cases related to environmental pollution has consistently declined, with 24,000 new cases filed in 2025, reflecting a 32.6% decrease from 2021, showcasing effective legal measures in ecological governance [3] Group 2: Biodiversity and Ecosystem Protection - A total of 135,000 first-instance cases related to biodiversity protection have been concluded, with a 36.4% decrease in case filings in 2025 compared to 2021, enhancing ecosystem diversity, stability, and sustainability [4] - The courts have actively participated in actions against illegal hunting and wildlife trafficking, demonstrating a strong judicial stance on biodiversity protection [4] Group 3: Ecological Security and Cultural Heritage - The courts have resolved 157,000 first-instance cases concerning ecological security, with a 33.8% decrease in case filings in 2025 compared to 2021, contributing to national security and social stability [4] - In the realm of cultural heritage protection, 10,000 cases have been adjudicated, with a 28.6% decrease in case filings in 2025 compared to 2021, ensuring the preservation of civilization and cultural continuity [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the dedication and professional commitment of Wang Zhiqiang, a veterinary expert and representative, in combating animal epidemics and ensuring public health safety through hands-on efforts and policy implementation [2][3][4]. Group 1: Professional Commitment - Wang Zhiqiang has been actively involved in animal epidemic prevention for nearly 20 years, emphasizing the importance of veterinary work in safeguarding both livestock farmers' livelihoods and public food safety [2][3]. - He has taken on significant responsibilities during major animal epidemic outbreaks, demonstrating leadership and a proactive approach to crisis management [3][4]. Group 2: Practical Experience and Skill Development - Wang has accumulated extensive practical experience through direct engagement in various veterinary roles, which has enhanced his ability to respond effectively to animal health crises [5][6]. - He has developed a systematic approach to blood sampling and disease detection, improving safety and efficiency in veterinary practices [6][7]. Group 3: Community Engagement and Legislative Role - As a representative, Wang Zhiqiang actively engages with grassroots veterinary personnel to understand their challenges and advocate for improvements in the animal epidemic prevention system [8][9]. - He has also shown a commitment to cultural heritage preservation, linking historical significance to community responsibility and legislative action [8][9].

（来源：法治日报） 转自：法治日报 □ 本报记者潘从武 □ 本报通讯员 王 晨 高潮 "火洲"吐鲁番地下，"生命之泉"坎儿井无声流淌；昆仑山腹 地，高寒山区民居传统村落被修复一新；新和县境内，吐孜吐尔烽火台遗址带着古老的记忆静静矗 立…… 新疆维吾尔自治区作为多种文明的荟萃之地，文物和文化遗产丰富，如散落戈壁的明珠，承载 着文明传承的厚重。 2020年，新疆维吾尔自治区人大常委会审议通过《新疆维吾尔自治区人民代表大 会常务委员会关于加强检察公益诉讼工作的决定》，以地方立法授权检察机关在包括文物和文化遗产在 内的多个领域开展公益诉讼。5年间，新疆检察机关共办理文物和文化遗产领域公益诉讼案件1161件。 2025年3月，新修订的文物保护法施行。其中增设的检察公益诉讼条款规定，因违反本法规定造成文物 严重损害或者存在严重损害风险，致使社会公共利益受到侵害的，人民检察院可以依照有关诉讼法的规 定提起公益诉讼。 在实践中，新疆检察机关立足公益诉讼检察职能，通过审前检察建议、提起诉讼、 协同履职等多种方式，推动破解文物和文化遗产保护难题。 "引来了雪水把它浇灌，搭起那藤架让阳光 照耀……"一曲令人耳熟能详的《吐鲁番的葡萄 ...

Core Viewpoint - The joint initiative "Guarding the Source of the Yellow River" by the People's Procuratorates of Qinghai and Gansu provinces aims to enhance ecological protection and resource conservation in the Yellow River basin through collaborative legal actions and public interest litigation [1][2]. Group 1: Collaborative Actions - The two provinces have established a cross-regional collaborative system to address ecological protection, with Gansu outlining nine key tasks and a three-tiered mechanism for implementation [1]. - Qinghai has integrated the initiative into its broader ecological civilization strategy, forming specialized teams and high-efficiency legal methods for case handling [1]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Achievements - As of January, a total of 1,227 public interest litigation cases related to ecological and resource protection in the Yellow River basin have been filed, resulting in 770 prosecutorial suggestions and 115 lawsuits [2]. - The initiative has led to the recovery of 21.75 million yuan for ecological restoration and the guidance of carbon credit purchases exceeding 500 tons, alongside the restoration of over 1,800 acres of grassland [2]. Group 3: Innovation in Governance - The provinces have developed a new governance model that combines "procuratorial + administrative" collaboration, conducting cross-province ecological environment inspections along the Yellow River [3]. - Qinghai has extended supervision to pastoral river sources through ecological guardians, while Gansu has established public interest litigation liaison stations in towns along the river [3].

Core Viewpoint - The newly passed "Hubei Province Shijiahe Site Protection Regulations" introduces a public interest litigation mechanism to protect cultural heritage, highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts in safeguarding historical sites [1] Group 1: Legislative Developments - The "Hubei Province Shijiahe Site Protection Regulations" was approved by the provincial people's congress on November 27, marking a significant step in heritage protection [1] - The regulations allow the prosecution to propose suggestions or initiate public interest lawsuits in cases of serious damage or risk to the Shijiahe site [1] Group 2: Site Significance - The Shijiahe site is recognized as the largest, highest-grade, and most well-preserved prehistoric urban settlement group in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, holding substantial historical, cultural, and archaeological value [1] Group 3: Challenges and Actions - Inspections revealed significant neglect at the site, including unaddressed excavation damage and unauthorized construction in protected areas [1] - The Hanjiang Procuratorate has initiated three administrative public interest litigation cases regarding illegal land occupation and unapproved construction activities at the site [1] Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - The Hanjiang Procuratorate has engaged experts from China University of Geosciences and provincial water conservancy specialists to assess flood risks and provide professional opinions on site protection [1] - The establishment of public interest litigation observation points has been advocated to enhance oversight and protection efforts [1] Group 5: Broader Impact - The Shijiahe site was included in the first national list of important major sites in 2025, becoming the first site in Hubei to receive provincial legislative protection [1] - The Hanjiang Procuratorate's efforts serve as a model for other local procuratorates, promoting the protection of cultural heritage across the region [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Jian Zhan, a renowned porcelain from the Song Dynasty and a national-level intangible cultural heritage project, has entered the top 100 geographical indication brands in China, supported by the efforts of the Jianyang District Procuratorate in Nanping City [1] Group 1: Protection Efforts - The Jianyang District Procuratorate has initiated public interest litigation actions to protect cultural heritage, addressing issues such as theft at the Jian Zhan site and product infringement [1] - The Procuratorate issued recommendations to clarify the protection area for the Jian Zhan site, highlighting the inadequacies in its protection [1] - A mechanism for sharing leads and joint inspections has been established between the Procuratorate and cultural tourism departments to enhance protection efforts [1] Group 2: Collaborative Initiatives - A "Procuratorate + Association" team has been formed to conduct legal education and "legal health checks" for enterprises involved in the Jian Zhan industry, contributing to its protection [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released typical cases of public interest litigation for the protection of cultural relics and heritage, emphasizing the importance of high-quality judicial actions to aid in the preservation of cultural heritage [1][5]. Group 1: Statistics and Trends - From January to May 2025, a total of 2,160 public interest litigation cases related to the protection of cultural relics and heritage were filed nationwide, accounting for 4.61% of the total public interest litigation cases, with a growth rate of 40.1% [1]. - The released cases include six typical examples, highlighting the proactive role of procuratorial organs in supervising administrative agencies that fail to fulfill their duties [1][5]. Group 2: Case Summaries - The cases cover various types of cultural relics, including ancient sites, buildings, and linear cultural heritage, focusing on both high and low-grade relics [2]. - Specific cases include: - The administrative public interest litigation case by the Ma'anshan City Procuratorate regarding the protection of the Wudanggang site [5]. - The case involving the "Dafu Di - Wenguang Archway" in Jiangxi Province, where the local procuratorate intervened due to the owner's inability to repair the dilapidated structure [14][15]. - The case concerning the protection of the Tuo Mountain Grottoes in Shandong Province, where the historical appearance of the relics was severely damaged [21][22]. - The case in Chongqing regarding the illegal transfer of state-owned immovable cultural relics [28][29]. - The case involving the protection of the Wanjia Tea Road cultural heritage in Hubei Province, focusing on the overall protection of linear cultural heritage [34][35]. - The case of the Ming Dynasty Huang Gong Guang Ji Bridge in Henan Province, where the bridge's safety and appearance were compromised due to municipal construction [41][42]. Group 3: Legal and Administrative Actions - The procuratorial organs have emphasized the use of public interest litigation to supervise administrative agencies that neglect their responsibilities, ensuring that cultural relics are effectively protected [13][20]. - The cases demonstrate a shift from individual relic protection to a more systematic approach, focusing on collective protection of similar relics or groups of relics [3]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to conduct follow-up inspections on previously handled cases, such as the protection of the Great Wall, to ensure compliance with rectification measures [3].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the implementation of whole-process people's democracy in judicial practices, ensuring that people's will and rights are prioritized [1] - Shanxi Province courts actively engage with the National People's Congress representatives to enhance judicial transparency and quality [1] Group 2 - The Supreme People's Court's report highlights the importance of ecological and restorative justice, with a total of 9.6 billion yuan in ecological damage compensation ordered [2] - A case in Wenxian County involved five individuals convicted of environmental pollution, resulting in a total economic loss of 1.2259 million yuan, with reparations paid for ecological restoration [2] Group 3 - The historical significance of red judicial resources is acknowledged, with a focus on modernizing judicial practices by learning from past experiences [3][4] - The exhibition of judicial documents from the anti-Japanese base areas showcases the contributions of judicial practices to social stability during wartime [4] Group 4 - A new cultural heritage protection law was enacted on March 1, aiming to enhance public awareness and legal compliance regarding cultural relics [5] - A public legal education event was held at the Yungang Grottoes, promoting the importance of cultural heritage protection [6][7] Group 5 - The establishment of a comprehensive social governance center is highlighted as a key measure for maintaining social order and resolving conflicts [8] - The importance of judicial involvement in grassroots governance and conflict resolution is emphasized, with suggestions for enhancing the effectiveness of judicial solutions [8][9]