Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released typical cases of public interest litigation for the protection of cultural relics and heritage, emphasizing the importance of high-quality judicial actions to aid in the preservation of cultural heritage [1][5]. Group 1: Statistics and Trends - From January to May 2025, a total of 2,160 public interest litigation cases related to the protection of cultural relics and heritage were filed nationwide, accounting for 4.61% of the total public interest litigation cases, with a growth rate of 40.1% [1]. - The released cases include six typical examples, highlighting the proactive role of procuratorial organs in supervising administrative agencies that fail to fulfill their duties [1][5]. Group 2: Case Summaries - The cases cover various types of cultural relics, including ancient sites, buildings, and linear cultural heritage, focusing on both high and low-grade relics [2]. - Specific cases include: - The administrative public interest litigation case by the Ma'anshan City Procuratorate regarding the protection of the Wudanggang site [5]. - The case involving the "Dafu Di - Wenguang Archway" in Jiangxi Province, where the local procuratorate intervened due to the owner's inability to repair the dilapidated structure [14][15]. - The case concerning the protection of the Tuo Mountain Grottoes in Shandong Province, where the historical appearance of the relics was severely damaged [21][22]. - The case in Chongqing regarding the illegal transfer of state-owned immovable cultural relics [28][29]. - The case involving the protection of the Wanjia Tea Road cultural heritage in Hubei Province, focusing on the overall protection of linear cultural heritage [34][35]. - The case of the Ming Dynasty Huang Gong Guang Ji Bridge in Henan Province, where the bridge's safety and appearance were compromised due to municipal construction [41][42]. Group 3: Legal and Administrative Actions - The procuratorial organs have emphasized the use of public interest litigation to supervise administrative agencies that neglect their responsibilities, ensuring that cultural relics are effectively protected [13][20]. - The cases demonstrate a shift from individual relic protection to a more systematic approach, focusing on collective protection of similar relics or groups of relics [3]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to conduct follow-up inspections on previously handled cases, such as the protection of the Great Wall, to ensure compliance with rectification measures [3].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the implementation of whole-process people's democracy in judicial practices, ensuring that people's will and rights are prioritized [1] - Shanxi Province courts actively engage with the National People's Congress representatives to enhance judicial transparency and quality [1] Group 2 - The Supreme People's Court's report highlights the importance of ecological and restorative justice, with a total of 9.6 billion yuan in ecological damage compensation ordered [2] - A case in Wenxian County involved five individuals convicted of environmental pollution, resulting in a total economic loss of 1.2259 million yuan, with reparations paid for ecological restoration [2] Group 3 - The historical significance of red judicial resources is acknowledged, with a focus on modernizing judicial practices by learning from past experiences [3][4] - The exhibition of judicial documents from the anti-Japanese base areas showcases the contributions of judicial practices to social stability during wartime [4] Group 4 - A new cultural heritage protection law was enacted on March 1, aiming to enhance public awareness and legal compliance regarding cultural relics [5] - A public legal education event was held at the Yungang Grottoes, promoting the importance of cultural heritage protection [6][7] Group 5 - The establishment of a comprehensive social governance center is highlighted as a key measure for maintaining social order and resolving conflicts [8] - The importance of judicial involvement in grassroots governance and conflict resolution is emphasized, with suggestions for enhancing the effectiveness of judicial solutions [8][9]