2026年2月13日，最高人民法院发布第48批指导性案例（指导性案例268-272号）。这是最高人民法院首次发布道路交通安全刑事专题指导性案例。 值得注意的是，本批指导性案例的主要内容包括酒后智驾相关规定。裁判规则明确激活辅助驾驶功能情形下驾驶人的刑事责任认定规则。 在辅助驾驶技术应用日益广泛的背景下，有的驾驶人在激活辅助驾驶系统后不再专注驾驶，而是玩手机、睡觉等，有的驾驶人甚至购买、使用"智驾神器"等 非法配件，逃避系统安全监测，长时间"脱手"驾驶，严重威胁道路交通安全。 行为人激活辅助驾驶功能，并利用私自安装的配件逃避辅助驾驶系统监测的，即使其不在主驾驶位实际操控机动车，仍应作为驾驶主体承担相应法律责任。 指导性案例271号《王某群危险驾驶案》明确，车载辅助驾驶系统不能代替驾驶人成为驾驶主体，驾驶人激活车载辅助驾驶功能后，仍是实际执行驾驶任务 的人，负有确保行车安全的责任。 1时37分许，该车行驶至目的地附近的杭州市临平区某路段处停止。因车辆挡道，过路群众发现车内仅有在副驾驶位睡觉的王某群，遂报警。民警到场后， 对王某群进行呼气酒精含量检测，发现王某群涉嫌醉驾，将其送至医院提取血样。经鉴定，王某群血液酒精 ...

据央视新闻，今天（13日），最高人民法院发布第48批指导性案例。这是最高人民法院首次发布道路交通安全刑事专题指导性案例。其中 案例《王某群危险驾驶案》引人关注。 该案例明确，车载辅助驾驶系统不能代替驾驶人成为驾驶主体，驾驶人激活车载辅助驾驶功能后， 仍是实际执行驾驶任务的人，负有确保行车安全的责任。即使驾驶人不在驾驶位也一样。 裁判理由 基本案情 2025年9月13日0时30分许，被告人王某群饮酒后驾驶汽车，从浙江省杭州市临平区塘栖镇某饭店附近回到其居住小区。同日1时15分许， 王某群又驾驶该车离开小区，随后激活该车辅助驾驶功能，设置目的地，利用其私自安装的、可以逃避辅助驾驶系统监测的"智驾神器"配 件，使车辆在实际无人监管状态下继续行驶，其则坐到副驾驶座位睡觉。1时37分许，该车行驶至目的地附近的杭州市临平区某路段处停 止。因车辆挡道，过路群众发现车内仅有在副驾驶位睡觉的王某群，遂报警。民警到场后，对王某群进行呼气酒精含量检测，发现王某群涉 嫌醉驾，将其送至医院提取血样。经鉴定，王某群血液酒精含量为114.5毫克/100毫升，属醉酒。 经查，被告人王某群所驾汽车安装有2级驾驶自动化系统，亦即辅助驾驶系统，具 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the draft notification from the State Administration for Market Regulation and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology regarding the management and supervision of intelligent connected new energy vehicles, emphasizing safety measures and consumer protection [2]. Group 1: Safety Measures and Consumer Protection - Companies must display safety prompts and usage instructions for combined driving assistance systems prominently in vehicle apps and user manuals to prevent drivers from misinterpreting these features as autonomous driving capabilities [3]. - Companies are required to develop and implement driver monitoring, warning, and intervention functions to ensure driver engagement, including measures like voice alerts and steering wheel vibrations when the driver is distracted or unresponsive [3]. - Companies must enhance defect information monitoring for intelligent connected new energy vehicles to mitigate risks from cyberattacks and vulnerabilities, with the market regulator conducting defect investigations as necessary [3][4]. Group 2: Compliance and Reporting Requirements - Companies must accurately report key information regarding combined driving assistance systems and energy storage devices in the vehicle qualification certificate system and adhere to classified management requirements for over-the-air (OTA) software upgrades [4]. - Companies are prohibited from misleading consumers about the capabilities of their driving assistance systems and must provide truthful and comprehensive information regarding automation levels and system boundaries [5]. - Companies are required to report safety incidents and collisions involving combined driving assistance systems promptly, with regulatory bodies conducting thorough investigations and audits of incident reporting [6].

Core Viewpoint - The release of the draft notice by the National Market Supervision Administration aims to enhance the regulation of smart connected new energy vehicles, ensuring that consumers correctly understand and operate these vehicles without being misled into thinking that driver assistance systems equate to fully autonomous driving [1][6]. Group 1: Regulatory Requirements - Companies must ensure that consumers can accurately understand and operate smart connected new energy vehicles, avoiding any implication that driver assistance systems are equivalent to autonomous driving systems [1][5]. - The draft notice mandates that companies display safety warnings and usage instructions for driver assistance systems prominently in vehicle apps and user manuals to prevent misunderstandings [3][4]. - Companies are required to develop and implement driver monitoring and warning systems that can take control measures when the driver is not actively engaged, such as issuing voice alerts or disabling assistance features [4][6]. Group 2: Advertising and Marketing Guidelines - The draft notice emphasizes that companies must provide truthful and comprehensive information regarding the automation levels and capabilities of their smart connected new energy vehicles, avoiding any misleading or exaggerated claims [5][6]. - Companies are prohibited from suggesting that their driver assistance systems can perform functions that they do not actually possess, thereby preventing misuse by consumers [5][6]. - The marketing of vehicles must clearly indicate that the current technology primarily supports Level 2 automation, rather than fully autonomous driving capabilities [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Context and Trends - The release of the draft notice comes in response to the rapid increase in new energy vehicle sales, which surpassed 10 million units last year, leading to intensified competition in the smart driving sector [6][7]. - The automotive industry has seen a significant rise in OTA (Over-The-Air) updates, with 463 functions updated in June alone, highlighting the need for stringent management of software updates to ensure safety and compliance [4][6]. - Experts suggest that the industry must adopt a more cautious approach to marketing smart driving technologies, focusing on accurate representations to foster healthy and orderly development [7].