Core Viewpoint - The current phase of macro liquidity being the most accommodative may be coming to an end, with expectations of a marginal decline in government debt growth and loan growth in the short term, potentially leading to a continued decline in M2 year-on-year in the first quarter [2][3] Group 1: Understanding Liquidity - Liquidity assessment includes two dimensions: the liquidity of the real economy and the liquidity of the financial market, where the former affects future price and profit trends, and the latter influences current capital market transaction volumes [6][14] - The two main factors affecting liquidity are the growth scale of M2 and the scale of residents' deposit migration [8][16] Group 2: Changes in Liquidity Conditions - M2 year-on-year growth may be declining due to the "escape from extraordinary" policy, with expectations that the marginal increase in government debt in 2026 may be less than in 2025, and a potential decrease in loan growth could further drag down M2 [9][22][23] - The recent increase in market volatility suggests that the probability of accelerated migration of residents' deposits is low, which may lead to a decline in macro liquidity [2][25] Group 3: Differences in Current Liquidity Conditions - The current phase of liquidity contraction differs from historical patterns in three key aspects: 1. The impact on corporate profits is different, as the midstream sector is currently the most stable, with its demand less sensitive to domestic liquidity conditions [3][32] 2. The relationship between stocks and bonds has changed, with current indicators suggesting that stocks have a relative advantage in allocation compared to bonds [3][39] 3. The policy response may differ, as the current economic dynamics are more aligned with high-tech innovation and direct financing rather than traditional real estate and local financing platforms [3][41]

宏观研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【宏观专题】 宽松过峰，股债重估 ❖ 核心观点 1、由于总量政策"摆脱超常规"叠加央行"优化供给，做优增量、盘活存量" 的表述，我们预计短期政府债增速和贷款增速或边际回落，这一过程或带来一 季度 M2 同比的持续下行。 2、考虑到近期市场波动率的小幅提升，居民存款加速搬家的概率不高的前提 下，M2 同比的回落会引致宏观流动性最宽松的时刻正在过去，历史经验来看， 这会对资产估值造成冲击。 3、但是本轮宏观流动性最宽松时段过去与历史相比存在三点不同： ①从基本面来看，当下基本面景气最确定的是中游，由于中游需求更依赖海外， 其景气相对独立，因此国内流动性的松紧对其需求影响不大，反而有助于其供 给侧的加速收缩。在这个视角下，国内流动性收缩对中游利润预期冲击不大。 ②从资产配置来看，绝对视角下，国际经验展示当下十债收益率仍低于国际合 理空间，相对视角下，我们的股债比价指标（股债夏普比率差值）仍显示当下 股票更具配置优势。因此如果流动性收缩冲击偏"贵"的资产的话，只要经济 循环仍在边际改善，那么债券反而是当下"偏贵"的资产。 ③如果经济遭遇突发事件打破循环，国内政策有望随时加码改善流动性 ...