Report Industry Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly mention the industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints - The extreme divergence between credit spreads and stock risk premiums led to the starting point of the current A-share valuation expansion. The current round of A-share market is driven by funds, and the logic has only reached the middle stage, with the upward trend unfinished [2]. - The fact that the risk premium has reached "mean - 1 standard deviation" does not mean the end of the market. Considering the intensity and duration of the current round of fund - driven, A - share valuations are expected to continue to expand, driving the risk premium to decline further, and the risk - compensation returns of stocks and bonds will eventually converge [2][5]. Summary by Directory 1. Historically, the stock market risk premium can stay below "mean - 1 standard deviation" for a long time - There were several historical periods when the stock market risk premium fell below "mean - 1 standard deviation", such as from December 2014 to August 2015, November 2017 to February 2018, and September 2020 to April 2021, with durations of 9 months, 2 months, and 8 months respectively. Except for the 2017 - 2018 period when the risk premium could not continue to decline due to rapid liquidity withdrawal, in other periods, it could fall to around "mean - 2 standard deviations" or even lower [3]. - These historical periods had similar macro - environments that did not support a bull market in stocks. The factors driving the significant expansion of A - share valuations were not fundamental but fund - driven, and there was no continuous expansion of corporate profits [3]. 2. In the current round of the market, the indexes have expanded to varying degrees, and there are no signs of an end - Since the beginning of the year, the stock market has priced in the decline of the risk - free rate. Different sectors have different repair progress. The repair of large - cap stocks is relatively large, with the ERP basically reaching "mean - 1 standard deviation", while the ERP of small - and medium - cap stocks is still above the historical mean [4]. - The current round of valuation expansion also starts from changes in the capital side. Since September 2024, the economic fundamentals and corporate profit growth have been weak, and the monetary policy has been relatively loose. The core factor determining the start and end of the market is the sustainability of fund - driving. The current round of fund - driven logic has only evolved to institutional - driven and allocation - driven (insurance funds taking the lead), and bank wealth management and public funds will take over in the second half of the year [4]. - With the expansion of A - share valuations, the risk premium of the Shanghai Composite Index has been below "mean - 1 standard deviation" since July 18, lasting for less than 1 month. "Mean - 1 standard deviation" cannot be a sign of the end of the market, especially since the risk premiums of some sectors are still above the mean [4]. 3. Valuation expansion space calculation under two scenario assumptions - Historically, the extreme situation of index valuation expansion is in the range of "mean - N standard deviations", where N is between 0.6 - 4.0, with a median of approximately 2.0. - Scenario 1 assumes that the stock market risk premium can fall to "mean - 2 standard deviations"; Scenario 2 assumes that it can fall to "mean - N standard deviations", where N corresponds to the lowest level previously reached by the index's ERP. - Based on these two assumptions, the ChiNext Index has the largest PE expansion space, followed by the Wind 300 (ex - banks), CSI 1000, and CSI 500. The PE expansion spaces of the SSE 50, Shanghai Composite Index, and Wind Dividend Index are relatively small, but there is still expansion space even in a conservative scenario [6][7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that with the gradual increase in market risk appetite, various funds are actively entering the market, with bank wealth management and public funds expected to become significant marginal forces in the second half of the year [1][2] - As of August 1, the weekly net subscription of stock ETFs in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets exceeded 60 billion and 50 billion units respectively in the past two weeks, indicating strong inflow of incremental funds [1] - In July, the new issuance scale of equity funds reached 34.7 billion, an 18.8% increase from June's 29.2 billion, with the number of new funds increasing by 26 [1] Group 2 - The average position of public actively managed mixed equity funds was approximately 85.99% as of July 25, up 2.05 percentage points from July 18, indicating a significant increase in equity exposure [2] - It is estimated that about 3 trillion yuan of incremental funds will enter the market from various institutions, including insurance, wealth management, public funds, and trusts in 2025 [2] - The current market environment is characterized by a historical extreme in the stock-bond price ratio, driving a shift in asset allocation towards equity assets due to expected return requirements [2] Group 3 - The liquidity easing is expected to provide valuation support for A-shares, with both domestic and international factors contributing to a favorable environment for risk assets [3] - The recent continuous rise in A-shares has led to some profit-taking, but the overall liquidity environment is anticipated to support valuations in the long term [3] - Structural opportunities in A-shares are expected to continue emerging due to the active participation of funds and the market's recovery in profitability [3]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - The reading of the bond market's micro - trading thermometer this period has increased by 5 percentage points to 55%. The number of indicators in the over - heated range remains at 35%. The trading heat has generally increased, while the bond - fund profit - taking pressure has decreased, the policy spread has slightly narrowed, and the stock - bond and commodity price - ratio percentile values have both declined [2][14][19]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1. Overall Indicator Changes - The reading of the micro - trading thermometer has increased by 5 percentage points to 55%. The trading heat indicators have increased significantly, and the percentile values of the relative turnover rate and the TL/T long - short ratio have risen. The percentile values of the listed companies' wealth - management purchase volume and the fund - rural commercial bank purchase volume have also increased substantially. The significantly decreased indicators include the fund duration, bond - fund profit - taking pressure, and commodity price ratio. Currently, indicators with high congestion levels include the 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover rate, fund divergence, fund ultra - long - term bond purchase volume, and allocation - disk strength [2][14]. - Among the 20 micro - indicators, 7 (35%) are in the over - heated range, 6 (30%) are in the neutral range, and 7 (35%) are in the cold range. The TL/T long - short ratio has moved from the cold range to the over - heated range; the listed companies' wealth - management purchase volume and the fund - rural commercial bank purchase volume have moved from the cold range to the neutral range; the fund duration has moved from the over - heated range to the neutral range; the bond - fund profit - taking pressure and the commodity price ratio have moved from the neutral range to the cold range [3][19]. 3.2. Sub - category Indicator Changes 3.2.1. Trading Heat Indicators - The proportion of trading heat indicators in the over - heated range has increased to 67%, in the neutral range remains at 17%, and in the cold range has decreased to 17%. The percentile values of the relative turnover rate have all increased slightly, and the TL/T long - short ratio percentile value has increased by 54 percentage points, moving from the cold range to the over - heated range [5]. - Specific indicators: The 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover rate has increased to 2.01, with the past - year percentile value rising by 2 percentage points to 92%; the 1/10Y Treasury bond turnover rate has increased to 0.1, with the past - year percentile value rising by 7 percentage points to 25%; the TL/T long - short ratio has increased to 1.01, with the past - year percentile value rising by 54 percentage points to 81%; the full - market turnover rate has increased to 19.13%, with the past - year percentile value rising by 10 percentage points to 53%; the institutional leverage has decreased to 88.14%, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 13 percentage points to 87%; the long - term Treasury bond trading proportion has increased to 65.77%, with the past - year percentile value rising by 27 percentage points to 73% [15][26]. 3.2.2. Institutional Behavior Indicators - The proportion of institutional behavior indicators in the over - heated range has decreased to 38%, in the neutral range has increased to 50%, and in the cold range has decreased to 13%. The fund duration percentile value has dropped by 25 percentage points to 49%, moving from the over - heated range to the neutral range; the bond - fund profit - taking pressure has dropped by 27 percentage points, moving from the neutral range to the cold range; the listed companies' wealth - management purchase volume and the fund - rural commercial bank purchase volume percentile values have increased by 56 and 63 percentage points respectively, both moving from the cold range to the neutral range [6][24]. - Specific indicators: The fund duration has decreased to 2.93 years, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 25 percentage points to 49%; the fund divergence has increased to 0.46, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 4 percentage points to 90%; the bond - fund profit - taking pressure has decreased to 15.93%, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 27 percentage points to 36%; the money - tightness expectation index has decreased to 0.93, with the past - year percentile value rising by 7 percentage points to 61%; the allocation - disk strength has decreased to 0.21%, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 4 percentage points to 86%; the listed companies' wealth - management purchase volume has increased to 116.4 billion, with the past - year percentile value rising by 56 percentage points to 69% [15][27]. 3.2.3. Spread Indicators - The policy spread has slightly narrowed from 8bp to 5bp, with the corresponding percentile value rising by 11 percentage points to 32%, still in the cold range. The credit spread is basically the same as the previous period. The average spread of the agricultural development - state - owned development spread, IRS - SHIBOR 3M spread has widened from 18bp to 20bp, and its percentile value has dropped by 5 percentage points to 42%, in the neutral range [7][30][32]. 3.2.4. Price - ratio Indicators - The proportion of price - ratio indicators in the cold range has increased to 100%. The stock - bond and commodity price - ratio percentile values have dropped by 17 and 22 percentage points respectively to 19% and 33%. The commodity price ratio has moved from the neutral range to the cold range, and the real - estate price ratio has slightly increased by 2 percentage points to 2% [8][32]. - Specific indicators: The market spread has a percentile value of 42%, in the neutral range; the policy spread has a percentile value of 32%, in the cold range; the stock - bond price ratio has decreased to 11.3%, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 17 percentage points to 32%; the commodity price ratio has decreased to - 2.4%, with the past - year percentile value dropping by 22 percentage points to 33%; the real - estate price ratio has increased to - 46.9%, with the past - year percentile value rising by 2 percentage points to 2%; the consumer goods price ratio has increased to - 9%, with the past - year percentile value rising by 9 percentage points to 18%, still in the cold range [15][32][33].

Report Industry Investment Rating - The industry is rated as "Overweight", indicating an expected increase of over 10% compared to the benchmark index in the next 6 - 12 months [67] Core View of the Report - In 2025, the market is driven by incremental funds from institutional liability - side changes, expected to bring 3 trillion yuan in incremental funds. The upward trend of A - shares will continue in the second half of the year. Active equity products will enter a new golden age, and mid - to high - volatility products are likely to attract incremental funds [5][15] Summary According to the Directory 1. Three Rounds of Market Review Driven by Funds: Individual Stock Era, Group - Holding Era, and Active Management Era - From 2014 - 2015, it was the individual stock era driven by retail investors and leverage. Policy encouraged capital market development, with IPO restart, Shanghai - Hong Kong Stock Connect launch, and liquidity release. Leverage and retail investors drove up market turnover and margin trading. Individual stocks and the index outperformed active equity funds [16][20] - From 2019 - 2021, it was the group - holding era of public funds. Core assets like Maotai Index and Ningzuohe aligned with industrial trends. Public funds had a positive feedback loop of new issuance, pricing power, and performance. Active equity funds outperformed the index, and non - heavy - held stocks by public funds performed the weakest [16][25] - In 2025, it is the active management era. Driven by institutional allocation, active equity funds are emerging, with their median returns comparable to individual stocks and outperforming the index [16] 2. The Rise of Active Management: Difficulty in Achieving Excess Returns through Heavy - Holding and Group - Holding, and Alpha Creation through Stock - Picking Ability - In this round of the market, heavy - held stocks by funds have not obtained significant excess returns. As of July 24, 2025, the top 5 heavy - held stocks by institutions only had a 3% excess return, compared to 75% in 2015 and 84% in 2020 [30][31] - The proportion of A - shares held by funds and the concentration of fund holdings are at a low level in the past five years. The proportion of fund - held market value decreased from 14% in 2021 to 7% - 8% in Q1 2025, and the concentration indicators such as CR100 and CR50 have also declined [34] - Fund heavy - held companies are shifting towards small - and medium - market - capitalization enterprises. The proportion of companies below 30 billion yuan in fund holdings increased from 8% in Q4 2020 to 14% in Q2 2025 [35] 3. Three Factors Resonate to Push up the Bottom Central System of A - shares - In terms of funds, major institutional types in 2025 are expected to bring 3 trillion yuan in incremental funds into the market, including 816.2 billion yuan from insurance, 326.8 - 584.8 billion yuan from wealth management, 939.1 billion yuan from public funds, and 583.3 billion yuan from trusts [42][44] - From the perspective of stock - bond ratio, non - bank funds prefer equity assets. With the decline of broad - spectrum interest rates, the 10 - year Treasury yield cannot meet the return requirements of liabilities. Since the beginning of this year, the scale of fixed - income + funds has expanded significantly, indicating strong demand for equity - like asset allocation [45] - A - share earnings are at the bottom. As of Q1 2025, the year - on - year growth rate of the net profit attributable to the parent of all A - shares (ex - finance) turned positive, mainly due to the low - base effect and cost management. Structural improvement is more worthy of attention [51] 4. Taking Fixed - Income + as an Example, What are the Institutional Preferences? - In terms of strategy selection, in bear markets, low - volatility products have a higher probability of achieving excellent performance, while in bull markets, high - volatility products have a higher probability of achieving excellent performance. In the current market, high - volatility products among the top 20% in performance ranking account for over 60% [54][59] - In terms of fund flow, during the 2019 - 2021 bull market, high - volatility products with excellent performance had a higher probability of net subscriptions. In 2025, funds are still in the transition from bear - market thinking to bull - market thinking, similar to 2019. Mid - to high - volatility products are likely to attract incremental funds [54][59]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - The reading of the micro - trading thermometer this period rose 6 percentage points to 52%, with significant increases in some indicators and slight decreases in others [2][14]. - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range increased to 35%, with changes in the intervals of several indicators [3][19]. - Only the average value of the matching percentile of price ratios declined, while different categories of indicators showed different trends [4][19]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1. Micro - trading Thermometer Reading - The "Guojin Securities Fixed - income Bond Market Micro - trading Thermometer" rose 6 percentage points to 52%. Indicators with large increases in percentile values include fund - rural commercial bank buying volume, 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover rate, and allocation disk strength, while TL/T long - short ratio, market - wide turnover rate, stock - bond price ratio, institutional leverage, and listed company wealth management buying volume decreased slightly [2][14]. 3.2. Proportion of Indicators in the Over - heated Range - Among 20 micro - indicators, 7 (35%) were in the over - heated range, 6 (30%) in the neutral range, and 7 (35%) in the cold range. 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover and fund - rural commercial bank buying volume moved from the cold to the over - heated range, allocation disk strength from the neutral to the over - heated range, TL/T long - short ratio from the over - heated to the neutral range, and stock - bond price ratio from the neutral to the cold range [3][19]. 3.3. Sub - categories of Indicators 3.3.1. Trading Heat - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range among trading heat indicators decreased to 50%, in the neutral range increased to 33%, and in the cold range decreased to 17%. The 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover rate percentile rose 55 percentage points to the over - heated range, while the TL/T long - short ratio percentile decreased 22 percentage points to the neutral range [5][22]. 3.3.2. Institutional Behavior - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range among institutional behavior indicators increased to 50%, in the neutral range decreased to 25%, and in the cold range decreased to 25%. Allocation disk strength percentile rose 18 percentage points to 76% and entered the over - heated range, and fund - rural commercial bank buying volume percentile rose 67 percentage points to the over - heated range [6][24]. 3.3.3. Policy Spread - The 3 - year Treasury bond yield declined slightly, and the policy spread narrowed from 2bp to 0bp, with the percentile rising 6 percentage points to 48% (neutral range). Credit spread, agricultural development - state - owned development spread, and IRS - SHIBOR 3M spread narrowed, and their average spread percentile rose 7 percentage points to 50% (neutral range) [7][30]. 3.3.4. Stock - Bond Price Ratio - The proportion of price - ratio indicators in the cold range increased to 100%. Only the stock - bond price ratio percentile decreased 15 percentage points to the cold range, while the commodity price ratio percentile rose 6 percentage points to 15%, and the real - estate price ratio changed little [8][33].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - The reading of the micro - trading thermometer for the current period has increased by 3 percentage points to 52%. The number of indicators in the over - heated range has risen to 35%. The 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover ratio has increased significantly, while some indicators such as the listed company's financial management purchase volume and commodity price - ratio percentile have declined to varying degrees [11][14][18]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Micro - trading Thermometer - The reading of the micro - trading thermometer for the current period has increased by 3 percentage points to 52% [11]. 3.2 Distribution of Indicator Ranges - Among the 20 micro - indicators, the number of indicators in the over - heated range has increased to 7 (35%), the number in the neutral range remains 6 (30%), and the number in the cold range has decreased to 7 (35%). The 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover ratio has risen from the cold range to the over - heated range, the overall market turnover ratio and the money tightening expectation have risen from the neutral range to the over - heated range, the market spread has risen from the cold range to the over - heated range, and the 1/10Y Treasury bond turnover ratio has dropped from the over - heated range to the neutral range [3][18]. 3.3 Classification of Indicators 3.3.1 Trading Heat Indicators - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range has risen to 50%, and the proportion in the neutral range remains 50%. The 30/10Y Treasury bond turnover ratio percentile has increased by 87 percentage points to 96% and risen from the cold range to the over - heated range; the overall market turnover ratio percentile has increased by 6 percentage points to 75% and risen from the neutral range to the over - heated range; the 1/10Y Treasury bond turnover ratio percentile has decreased by 17 percentage points to 60% and dropped from the over - heated range to the neutral range; the TL/T long - short ratio percentile has increased by 10 percentage points [5][19]. 3.3.2 Institutional Behavior Indicators - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range has risen to 50%, the proportion in the neutral range has decreased to 13%, and the proportion in the cold range remains 38%. The money tightening expectation percentile has slightly increased by 1 percentage point to 70% and risen from the neutral range to the over - heated range. The listed company's financial management purchase volume has decreased by 17 percentage points to 4% [6][23]. 3.3.3 Spread Indicators - The policy spread has further narrowed by 1bp to - 1bp, and the 3 - year Treasury bond yield has fallen below the policy rate again, with its percentile continuing to rise by 5 percentage points to 59%, still in the neutral range. The credit spread, IRS - SHIBOR 3M spread, and Agricultural Development - CDB spread have changed, and the average spread has narrowed by 1bp to 18bp, with its percentile slightly rising by 1 percentage point to 41%, in the neutral range [7][30]. 3.3.4 Price - ratio Indicators - The proportion of indicators in the cold range remains 100%. The commodity price - ratio and real - estate price - ratio percentiles have decreased by 6 and 2 percentage points to 7% and 27% respectively, while the stock - bond price - ratio and consumer goods price - ratio percentiles remain the same as the previous period [8][30].

Group 1: Overall Report Summary - The reading of the bond market micro - trading thermometer increased by 5 percentage points to 48%. Except for the spread congestion, the average quantile of other indicators rose. High - congestion indicators include the purchase volume of ultra - long bonds by funds [2][14]. - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range increased slightly to 15%. Among 20 micro - indicators, 3 were in the over - heated range (15%), 9 were in the neutral range (45%), and 8 were in the cold range (40%). The TL/T long - short ratio moved from the cold to the neutral range, while the allocation disk strength and the stock - bond ratio moved from the neutral to the cold range [3][19]. Group 2: Indicator Category Analysis Trading Heat Indicators - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range remained at 17%, in the neutral range increased to 67%, and in the cold range decreased to 17%. The TL/T long - short ratio quantile rose 40 percentage points to 49%, moving from the cold to the neutral range. The 30/10Y and 1/10Y relative turnover rate quantiles rose 24 and 14 percentage points respectively, driving the average trading heat quantile up 13 percentage points [5][21]. Institutional Behavior Indicators - The proportion of indicators in the over - heated range rose to 25%, in the neutral range dropped to 38%, and in the cold range rose to 38%. The allocation disk strength quantile dropped 35 percentage points to 33%, moving from the neutral to the cold range. The average institutional behavior quantile rose slightly by 2 percentage points [6][26]. Spread Indicators - The spread quantile average dropped slightly by 1 percentage point. The market spread dropped 4 percentage points, while the policy spread quantile rose 2 percentage points. The policy spread narrowed slightly by 1bp to 3bp, with the quantile rising to 43% and remaining in the neutral range. The average of credit spread, IRS - SHIBOR 3M spread, and Agricultural Development - National Development spread widened slightly by 1bp to 18bp, with the quantile dropping 4 percentage points to 40% and remaining in the neutral range [4][7]. Comparison Ratio Indicators - The proportion of indicators in the cold range rose to 100%. The stock - bond ratio quantile dropped 2 percentage points to 38%, moving from the neutral to the cold range. The commodity and real - estate comparison ratio quantiles rose 5 and 4 percentage points respectively, remaining in the cold range. The consumer goods comparison ratio remained in the cold range. The average comparison ratio quantile rose 2 percentage points [8][33].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided regarding the report's industry investment rating. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The bond market is expected to remain volatile in the short - term. Although there are uncertain positive factors, the duration of the bond market should be maintained. If the funding rate declines, leverage can be appropriately increased [2][7][13][14]. - The relative loosening of funds lower than expected is the current main line of interest - rate trading. However, the loosening of funds should not be a continuous reason for bulls to be optimistic about the bond market. The significant decline of the funding rate is "unrealistic" according to experience, and if the expectation of loose funds persists, a lower - than - expected situation may lead to a bond - market correction [3][4][13][14]. - To be more bullish on the bond market, the main factors should revolve around the fundamental situation and risk appetite. There are uncertainties in the fundamental situation, such as the possible recurrence of trade frictions and the lower - than - expected results of "front - loading exports" [4][14]. 3. Summaries According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 This Week's Institutional Behavior Review: What Cards Do Bond Bulls Still Have? - This week, the credit market was strong, but interest rates fluctuated upward. The 3 - year medium - and short - term notes decreased by about 5bp, while the 10 - year Treasury bonds fluctuated up by nearly 5bp, and the credit spread narrowed overall [2][13]. - The relative loosening of funds lower than expected is the current main line of interest - rate trading. The funding rate (DR007) rose from 1.50% to around 1.60% this week, which impacted short - term bonds and caused long - term bonds to fluctuate weakly. After a 10bp interest - rate cut, some lower funding rates have formed a positive carry with many credit - bond varieties, so the credit market performed relatively strongly [3][13]. 3.2 Bond Market Yield Curve and Term Spread 3.2.1 Yield Curve: Yields of Treasury Bonds and China Development Bank Bonds Generally Rose - Treasury bond yields: The 1 - year yield rose 3bp, the 3 - year yield rose 4bp, the 5 - year yield rose 8bp, the 7 - year yield rose 6bp, the 10 - year yield rose 4bp, the 15 - year yield rose 6bp, and the 30 - year yield rose 4bp. The percentile points also increased to varying degrees [17]. - China Development Bank bond yields: The 1 - year yield rose 3bp, the 3 - year yield rose 3bp, the 5 - year yield rose 6bp, the 7 - year yield rose 6bp, the 10 - year yield rose 5bp, the 15 - year yield rose 4bp, and the 30 - year yield rose 4bp. The percentile points also changed accordingly [17]. 3.2.2 Term Spread: The Inversion of Treasury Bond Yield Spreads Eased, while that of China Development Bank Bonds Deepened; Treasury Bond Spreads Widened at the Short End, and China Development Bank Bond Spreads Widened Overall - Treasury bonds: The inversion of interest - rate spreads eased, and the term spread widened at the short end and narrowed at the long end. The 1Y - DR001 interest - rate spread inversion eased by 14bp, and the 1Y - DR007 interest - rate spread inversion eased by 11bp. The 3Y - 1Y spread widened by 3bp, the 5Y - 3Y spread widened by 2bp, the 7Y - 5Y spread narrowed by 1bp, the 10Y - 7Y spread narrowed by 2bp, the 15Y - 10Y spread widened by 1bp, and the 30Y - 15Y spread narrowed by 1bp. The percentile points also changed [18]. - China Development Bank bonds: The inversion of interest - rate spreads deepened, and the term spread widened overall. The 1Y - DR001 interest - rate spread inversion deepened by 11bp, and the 1Y - DR007 interest - rate spread inversion deepened by 7bp. The 3Y - 1Y spread changed by less than 1bp, the 5Y - 3Y spread widened by 3bp, the 7Y - 5Y spread changed by less than 1bp, the 10Y - 7Y spread narrowed by 1bp, the 15Y - 10Y spread changed by less than 1bp, and the 30Y - 15Y spread widened by 1bp. The percentile points also changed [20]. 3.3 Bond Market Leverage and Funding Situation 3.3.1 Leverage Ratio: Maintained at 106.70% From May 12 to May 16, 2025, the leverage ratio first rose and then fell during the week. As of May 16, the leverage ratio was about 106.70%, the same as last Friday and 0.19pct lower than Monday [24]. 3.3.2 This Week's Average Daily Turnover of Pledged Repurchase was 7.1 Trillion Yuan, with an Average Daily Overnight Proportion of 88.36% The average daily repurchase turnover increased compared with last week. From May 12 to May 16, the average daily turnover of pledged repurchase was about 7.1 trillion yuan, an increase of 0.3 trillion yuan from last week. The average overnight repurchase turnover was 6.3 trillion yuan, a month - on - month increase of 0.47 trillion yuan, and the average overnight trading proportion was 88.36%, a month - on - month increase of 2.57pct [29][34]. 3.3.3 Funding Situation: Banks' Fund Lending First Rose and then Fell From May 12 to May 16, the net lending of bank - related funds first rose and then fell. On May 16, the net lending of large - scale and policy banks was 3.24 trillion yuan; joint - stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks had an average daily net borrowing of 0.05 trillion yuan, and on May 16, the net borrowing was 0.2 trillion yuan. The net lending of the banking system was 3.05 trillion yuan. The main fund - borrowing party was funds, and the lending of money - market funds first decreased and then increased [35]. 3.4 Duration of Medium - and Long - Term Bond Funds 3.4.1 The Median Duration Decreased to 2.73 Years This week (from May 12 to May 16), the median duration of medium - and long - term bond funds was 2.73 years (de - leveraged) and 2.95 years (including leverage). On May 16, the median duration (de - leveraged) was 2.73 years, a decrease of 0.05 years from last Friday; the median duration (including leverage) was 2.95 years, a decrease of 0.01 years from last Friday [48]. 3.4.2 The Duration of Interest - Rate Bond Funds Rose to 3.90 Years In terms of different types of bond funds, the median duration of interest - rate bond funds (including leverage) rose to 3.90 years, an increase of 0.12 years from last Friday; the median duration of credit - bond funds (including leverage) decreased to 2.64 years, a decrease of 0.03 years from last Friday. The median duration of interest - rate bond funds (de - leveraged) was 3.35 years, a decrease of 0.02 years from last Friday; the median duration of credit - bond funds (de - leveraged) was 2.55 years, a decrease of 0.02 years from last Friday [52]. 3.5 Comparison of Category Strategies 3.5.1 Sino - US Interest - Rate Spread: The Overall Inversion Deepened The inversion of the Sino - US Treasury - bond spread deepened overall. The 1 - year spread inversion deepened by 5bp, the 2 - year by 5bp, the 3 - year by 6bp, the 5 - year spread inversion eased by 2bp, the 7 - year spread changed by less than 1bp, the 10 - year spread inversion deepened by 2bp, and the 30 - year spread inversion deepened by 2bp [54]. 3.5.2 Implied Tax Rate: The Short - End Narrowed, and the Long - End Widened As of May 16, the spread between China Development Bank bonds and Treasury bonds changed by less than 1bp for the 1 - year, narrowed by 1bp for the 3 - year, narrowed by 2bp for the 5 - year, changed by less than 1bp for the 7 - year, changed by less than 1bp for the 10 - year, narrowed by 1bp for the 15 - year, and widened by 1bp for the 30 - year [58]. 3.6 Changes in Bond - Lending Balances - On May 16, the concentration trend of lending for the active 10 - year China Development Bank bonds rose, while that for the active 10 - year Treasury bonds, the second - active 10 - year Treasury bonds, the second - active 10 - year China Development Bank bonds, and the active 30 - year Treasury bonds declined [60]. - In terms of institutions, the lending balance of securities companies increased, while that of large - scale and small - and medium - sized banks decreased [61].