Core Insights - The performance of the musical "Jinsha" featured the AI digital representation of the late singer Yao Beina, marking a significant moment in the discussion of AI's role in reviving cultural figures [1][11] - The integration of AI technology in live performances raises complex ethical considerations and technical challenges, particularly in achieving a balance between authenticity and technological recreation [11][12] Technical Implementation - The sound restoration process faced challenges in obtaining a pure vocal track of Yao Beina, requiring the team to extract her voice from mixed audio sources before using AI to generate the final sound [4][5] - The AI model was trained using musical scores to ensure it could perform with the necessary nuances of singing, which is more complex than regular speech [5][9] - Visual representation involved enhancing old photographs and creating a detailed 3D model to accurately depict Yao Beina's appearance during her original performance [5][9] Ethical Considerations - The project adhered to strict ethical guidelines, ensuring that the digital content generated was exclusively for the musical and would not be repurposed for other projects [11][12] - The industry faces ongoing debates regarding the implications of AI "resurrection," including potential legal risks and the simplification of human complexity in digital representations [11][12] - Public sentiment remains divided, with some audience members preferring traditional recordings over AI-generated performances, highlighting the tension between technological innovation and the preservation of authentic memories [12]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of online memorial services and AI resurrection technologies has led to ethical concerns and potential violations of personal rights, as these services often exploit personal information for commercial gain [1][2][3] Group 1: Online Memorial Services - Numerous incidents related to online memorials have gained attention, including a case where a living person was memorialized over 43,000 times due to a platform's failure to verify the authenticity of deceased information [1] - The commercialization of online memorials has transformed solemn remembrance into a profit-driven spectacle, with platforms creating "incense rankings" that link monetary contributions to the remembrance of the deceased [1][2] Group 2: AI Resurrection Technologies - AI resurrection involves using digital technologies to create virtual representations of deceased individuals, raising concerns about personal information leakage and the ethical implications of such practices [2][3] - The commercialization of AI resurrection has led to a range of products available on e-commerce platforms, with prices varying from hundreds to thousands of yuan, indicating a shift from individual cases to broader market applications [2] Group 3: Ethical and Legal Concerns - The lack of clear legal frameworks regarding the ownership of data rights for digitally created personas presents significant challenges, especially as platforms may lower standards to maximize profits [3] - There is a pressing need for platforms to enhance user information verification processes and for regulatory bodies to address illegal activities related to personal information exploitation [2][3]