Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ethical and copyright issues surrounding AI-generated videos of deceased celebrities, particularly focusing on the case of Robin Williams and the implications of OpenAI's Sora 2.0 release, which has sparked significant controversy and backlash from family members and industry stakeholders [1][2][3]. Group 1: AI Video Generation and Controversy - The release of Sora 2.0 has led to a surge in AI-generated videos featuring Robin Williams, raising concerns about the manipulation of his image and voice without consent [1][3][5]. - Robin Williams' daughter has publicly condemned the creation of AI videos of her father, emphasizing the emotional distress it causes to the family and the disrespect it shows to his legacy [5][6]. - The rapid adoption of Sora 2.0, which reportedly surpassed one million downloads within five days, highlights the growing demand for AI-generated content, but also the challenges of regulating its use [5][6]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Implications - The article outlines the legal framework in China regarding the posthumous rights of deceased individuals, indicating that family members can claim rights over the deceased's image and voice, which complicates the use of AI in recreating these figures [8][9]. - OpenAI has faced pressure from various stakeholders, including Hollywood unions and family members, to establish clearer boundaries regarding the use of deceased individuals' likenesses in AI-generated content [13][14]. - OpenAI has adjusted its copyright policy from an opt-out to an opt-in mechanism, allowing public figures to control the use of their likenesses in Sora-generated videos, although this does not address the rights of deceased individuals [14][15]. Group 3: Industry Response and Future Directions - The article notes that the backlash against AI-generated content is not isolated, as other companies in the industry have faced similar legal challenges and public outcry regarding copyright infringement [13][16]. - There is a call for a more structured approach to the ethical use of AI in recreating public figures, with suggestions for obtaining explicit consent from deceased individuals' estates and establishing clearer guidelines for AI platforms [9][16]. - The ongoing debate highlights the tension between artistic expression and the rights of individuals, suggesting that the industry is still in the process of finding a balance between innovation and ethical responsibility [16].

21世纪经济报道记者肖潇 2014年8月11日，美国著名演员罗宾·威廉姆斯在加州家中自杀身亡。十一年后，他的名字再次被卷入舆 论漩涡。 近日，他的女儿在社交媒体上发出一则声明，恳请人们停止向她发送AI制作的父亲视频。"看着真实人 物的遗产被简化成'看起来和听起来有点像他们就行'，然后任由别人制作操纵他们形象的恶心短视 频……这简直令人发狂。" "AI复活影像"再次引发网友的跟风创作，这与OpenAI最新发布的 Sora 2 密切相关。9月底，最新的视频 生成大模型Sora 2.0发布，同步上线的Sora独立应用，首周下载量便超过了ChatGPT，登顶美国App Store免费榜单。 Sora 2发布后，罗宾又重新"活跃"在社交平台上。在一条点赞上千的TikTok视频中，他出现在便利店柜 台前，一边结账一边开玩笑，配文写道："罗宾·威廉姆斯今天来到了商店。" 另一条TikTok视频中，他面对镜头严肃地说："如果你要借用我的脸，我的声音——不管是什么数字技 术，都给我放尊重点"。讽刺的是，视频右侧还带着Sora的生成水印。 最新的Sora 2视频生成大模型于9月30日上线，自称为视频生成领域的"GPT-3.5时刻 ...

Core Insights - The performance of the musical "Jinsha" featured the AI digital representation of the late singer Yao Beina, marking a significant moment in the discussion of AI's role in reviving cultural figures [1][11] - The integration of AI technology in live performances raises complex ethical considerations and technical challenges, particularly in achieving a balance between authenticity and technological recreation [11][12] Technical Implementation - The sound restoration process faced challenges in obtaining a pure vocal track of Yao Beina, requiring the team to extract her voice from mixed audio sources before using AI to generate the final sound [4][5] - The AI model was trained using musical scores to ensure it could perform with the necessary nuances of singing, which is more complex than regular speech [5][9] - Visual representation involved enhancing old photographs and creating a detailed 3D model to accurately depict Yao Beina's appearance during her original performance [5][9] Ethical Considerations - The project adhered to strict ethical guidelines, ensuring that the digital content generated was exclusively for the musical and would not be repurposed for other projects [11][12] - The industry faces ongoing debates regarding the implications of AI "resurrection," including potential legal risks and the simplification of human complexity in digital representations [11][12] - Public sentiment remains divided, with some audience members preferring traditional recordings over AI-generated performances, highlighting the tension between technological innovation and the preservation of authentic memories [12]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of online memorial services and AI resurrection technologies has led to ethical concerns and potential violations of personal rights, as these services often exploit personal information for commercial gain [1][2][3] Group 1: Online Memorial Services - Numerous incidents related to online memorials have gained attention, including a case where a living person was memorialized over 43,000 times due to a platform's failure to verify the authenticity of deceased information [1] - The commercialization of online memorials has transformed solemn remembrance into a profit-driven spectacle, with platforms creating "incense rankings" that link monetary contributions to the remembrance of the deceased [1][2] Group 2: AI Resurrection Technologies - AI resurrection involves using digital technologies to create virtual representations of deceased individuals, raising concerns about personal information leakage and the ethical implications of such practices [2][3] - The commercialization of AI resurrection has led to a range of products available on e-commerce platforms, with prices varying from hundreds to thousands of yuan, indicating a shift from individual cases to broader market applications [2] Group 3: Ethical and Legal Concerns - The lack of clear legal frameworks regarding the ownership of data rights for digitally created personas presents significant challenges, especially as platforms may lower standards to maximize profits [3] - There is a pressing need for platforms to enhance user information verification processes and for regulatory bodies to address illegal activities related to personal information exploitation [2][3]