来源：钛媒体 在西部经济版图中，四川始终扮演着特殊角色：它既拥有全国罕见的能源、矿产与农业资源禀赋，又聚集了白酒、装备制造、生物医药、电子信息等 一批全国性龙头企业。这种"资源底盘 + 产业高地"的结构，使四川上市公司的长期竞争力，天然面临一个更复杂的问题——资源优势，能否被转化为 可持续的治理能力与长期价值？ 近日，济安金信发布《四川上市公司ESG-V评级榜》，对四川地区多家上市公司从环境（E）、社会（S）、治理（G）与价值（V）四个维度进行系 统评估，试图回答一个资本市场愈发关注的核心问题：在资源约束、周期波动与产业升级交织的背景下，哪些企业已经具备将责任治理转化为长期价 值的能力，哪些仍停留在"资源驱动"或"周期依赖"的阶段。 与传统ESG评价侧重合规与披露不同，ESG-V评级体系在E、S、G三大责任维度之外，引入"价值（V）"作为关键变量，从投资视角观察企业是否具备 可持续的盈利能力、稳定的资本回报结构以及被长期资金定价的基础。也正是在这一框架下，四川样本呈现出明显的结构分化。 在本次评级中，新易盛是四川地区唯一获得ESG-V最高等级AAA的企业。其在治理（G）与价值（V）维度均达到AAA，社会维度亦 ...

Core Insights - The GDP ranking of China's top 30 cities for the first three quarters of 2025 has been released, with Chongqing ranking fourth at 24,449.36 billion yuan, highlighting its economic resilience and development potential [1] - The increasing focus on sustainable development in the capital market has led to the evaluation of listed companies based on their performance in environmental, social, governance, and value creation aspects [1] ESG-V Rating System - The ESG-V rating system developed by Jiaan Jinxin evaluates companies not only on environmental, social, and governance compliance but also introduces a "value" dimension, aiming to assess whether corporate responsibility translates into operational resilience and long-term value [2] - The E dimension emphasizes environmental impact and resource efficiency, S focuses on compliance and stakeholder responsibility, G measures governance transparency and internal control mechanisms, while V observes value creation and pricing rationality from an investment perspective [2] Leading Companies - Giant Network received the only AAA rating, showcasing exceptional governance and stable long-term value creation, distinguishing itself in a competitive market [3] - Other AA-rated companies include Longxin General, Sanfeng Environment, and China Automotive Research, which excel in environmental governance, social responsibility, and sustainable value creation, becoming leaders in Chongqing's capital market [3] Mid-Tier Companies - Among the 65 evaluated companies, nearly 60% are rated BBB (16 companies), BB (14 companies), and B (7 companies), indicating a foundational compliance and governance framework but facing challenges in improving their ESG-V ratings [4] - Key challenges include enhancing environmental management, improving governance transparency, and stabilizing value creation amidst market volatility [4] Low-Rated Companies - Companies rated CCC (6), CC (5), and C (2) generally exhibit deficiencies in environmental management, governance transparency, and stable value creation [5] - The primary challenge for these companies is to convert external pressures into internal improvements, enhancing governance capabilities, environmental management, and stabilizing their business models [5] - The ESG-V rating list serves as a "stress test" for Chongqing's capital market, indicating that companies must balance responsibility and value to secure future investment value and market position [5]

Core Insights - The article discusses the ESG-V rating system applied to listed companies in Guangdong, emphasizing its role in assessing the sustainability and investment value of companies in China's economic hubs [1][2][3] Group 1: ESG-V Rating Framework - The ESG-V rating system integrates corporate value into traditional ESG assessments, focusing on objective, industry-specific, and verifiable metrics [1][2] - The evaluation covers four dimensions: Environment (E), Social (S), Governance (G), and Value (V), aiming to provide a comprehensive view of corporate sustainability and investment potential [1][3] Group 2: Environmental (E) Assessment - The environmental evaluation extends beyond pollution control to assess the overall environmental impact across the entire supply chain, including raw material sourcing and product lifecycle [1] - Companies are identified based on their ability to innovate with green technologies and collaborate within the industry to build long-term competitive advantages [1] Group 3: Social (S) Assessment - The social dimension focuses on the legality and authenticity of corporate operations, scrutinizing issues like financial fraud and information disclosure violations [1][2] - It emphasizes the fundamental legal responsibilities and social trust obligations that companies owe to investors, employees, and the public [1] Group 4: Governance (G) Assessment - Governance is defined as "corporate oversight," expanding the evaluation to include relationships with all stakeholders, particularly in tax compliance and debt obligations [2] - The framework incorporates the business environment into governance assessments, highlighting the importance of positive interactions with regulatory bodies [2] Group 5: Value (V) Assessment - The value dimension innovatively integrates corporate value into the ESG framework, utilizing the "Ji'an Pricing" model to assess long-term investment value and valuation rationality [2] - This allows investors to evaluate companies' sustainability capabilities alongside their potential for investment returns within a unified framework [2] Group 6: Guangdong Listed Companies Evaluation - A total of 790 companies were evaluated in Guangdong, with 8 achieving the highest rating of AAA, including notable firms like Haitai Flavor Industry and China Merchants Bank [3][5] - The rating system categorizes companies into ten levels from AAA to D, with 35 companies rated AA and 122 rated A, indicating a solid foundation for sustainable development and value management in Guangdong [3][5]