Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from November 1, 2023, to November 19, 2024, related to misleading statements about the company's inventory management and financial performance [1][5][6]. Company Overview - e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. offers cosmetic and skincare products under various brand names, employing an omni-channel distribution strategy that includes retail partnerships and direct e-commerce sales [4]. - The company positions itself with accessible pricing, with an average product price point of approximately $6, significantly lower than competitors [4]. - e.l.f. claims to have a scalable, asset-light supply chain, primarily sourcing products from China through third-party manufacturers [4]. Financial Performance and Inventory Management - Effective inventory management is crucial for e.l.f.'s financial success, as revenue is derived from sales net of discounts, returns, and markdowns [4]. - In fiscal Q2 2024, e.l.f. began to face growth concerns due to rising inventory levels linked to declining sales, which the company allegedly concealed from investors [5]. - The lawsuit claims that e.l.f. made materially false statements regarding its business and financial prospects, including inflated revenue and profits [5][6]. Allegations and Impact - Muddy Waters Research published a report alleging that e.l.f. had materially overstated revenue and concealed inventory challenges, attributing rising inventory levels to sourcing changes rather than insufficient sales [7]. - Following the report, e.l.f.'s stock price fell by $2.71 per share, or 2.23%, on November 20, 2024 [8]. - After the Class Period, e.l.f. revised its fiscal 2025 net sales growth outlook down to 27%-28% from 28%-30% and adjusted EBITDA guidance down to $289-293 million from $304-308 million [9]. Stock Performance - As of March 5, 2025, e.l.f.'s stock price closed at $64.67 per share, reflecting a total decline of $57.04 per share, or nearly 47%, since the issues regarding inventory management and revenue were revealed [10].

If you suffered Elf losses, you may CLICK HERE or copy and paste the following link into your browser: https://www.ktmc.com/new-cases/elf-beauty-inc? utm_source=PR&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=elf&mktm=r You can also contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. by calling (484) 270-1453 or by email at [email protected]. DEFENDANTS' ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material facts a ...

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements during the class period from November 1, 2023, to November 19, 2024 [1] Allegations - The complaint alleges that e.l.f. Beauty was experiencing rising inventory levels due to declining sales, contrary to its representations to investors [1] - The company falsely attributed the rising inventory levels to changes in sourcing practices [1] - To maintain investor confidence, e.l.f. reported inflated revenue, profits, and inventory over several quarters [1] - The company's business and financial prospects were overstated, which, once revealed, would likely have a material negative impact [1] - The public statements made by the company were materially false and misleading at all relevant times [1] Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased shares of e.l.f. Beauty during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action, with a deadline of May 5, 2025, to seek lead plaintiff status [2] - Registered shareholders will be enrolled in a portfolio monitoring software to receive updates throughout the lifecycle of the case [2] Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors who have suffered due to deceit, fraud, and illegal business practices [3] - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors affected by misleading statements that led to artificial inflation of stock prices [3]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from November 1, 2023, to November 19, 2024, seeking damages for misleading statements regarding the company's business and financial health [1][4][5]. Company Overview - e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. provides cosmetic and skin care products under various brand names, employing an "omni-channel distribution strategy" that includes retail partnerships and direct e-commerce sales [3]. - The company positions itself with a value proposition of accessible pricing, with an average product price point of approximately $6, significantly lower than competitors [3]. - e.l.f. claims to have a scalable, asset-light supply chain primarily based in China, allowing for cost competitiveness and flexibility in manufacturing [3]. Financial Performance and Inventory Management - Effective inventory management is critical for e.l.f.'s financial performance, as revenue is derived from sales net of discounts, returns, and markdowns [3]. - The company faced challenges in inventory management, with rising inventory levels indicating flagging sales, which were allegedly concealed from investors [4][6]. - Throughout the Class Period, e.l.f. reportedly made materially false statements about its business health, including inflated revenue and profits, while failing to disclose rising inventory levels due to insufficient sales [4][5]. Impact of Allegations - Following the release of a report by Muddy Waters Research alleging that e.l.f. had materially overstated revenue, the company's stock price fell by $2.71 per share, or 2.23%, on November 20, 2024 [6][7]. - After the Class Period, e.l.f. revised its fiscal 2025 outlook, expecting net sales growth to be 27%-28%, down from previous guidance, and adjusted EBITDA guidance to $289-293 million, reflecting a decline in sales expectations [8]. - By March 5, 2025, e.l.f.'s stock price had declined to $64.67 per share, representing a nearly 47% drop since the inventory management issues were revealed [9].

As part of the expansion strategy, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has partnered with Adobe Inc. (ADBE) to enhance its digital marketing efforts using Adobe Firefly, a generative AI tool. As the parent company of brands like Clinique, Estée Lauder, Jo Malone London, La Mer and M·A·C Cosmetics, EL connects with consumers in 150 countries and is focused on innovation and speed to market.By integrating Adobe Firefly Services into its design tools, EL aims to automate repetitive tasks, allowing creative te ...

Group 1: Alibaba - Alibaba is considered one of the cheapest stocks, trading at a forward P/E ratio of less than 15 times 2025 analyst estimates [2] - The company has made significant advancements in AI, particularly with its foundational AI model Qwen 2.5-Max, which supports various specialized open-source AI models [3] - The cloud intelligence group reported a 13% revenue growth to $4.3 billion, with AI-related revenue increasing for six consecutive quarters [4] - E-commerce platforms Tmall and Taobao are showing a turnaround, with overall segment revenue rising by 5% and third-party business revenue climbing by 9% [5] - Overall, Alibaba is gaining momentum as a cheap stock [6] Group 2: e.l.f. Beauty - e.l.f. Beauty's shares have decreased by nearly two-thirds, placing the stock in bargain territory with a forward P/E of 23 and a PEG ratio of 0.5 [7] - The company lowered its quarterly revenue growth forecast to 1% to 2% due to poor industry trends and potential impacts from a TikTok ban [8] - e.l.f. has opportunities for growth in the skincare market and adjacent categories like fragrance, along with international expansion [9] - The cosmetic industry tends to perform well during recessions, suggesting resilience for e.l.f. Beauty [10] - This is seen as a favorable time to acquire shares of e.l.f. Beauty while prices are low [11] Group 3: Crocs - Crocs shares have declined by about 20% over the past year, trading at a forward P/E of under 8 [12] - The company is focusing on turning around the HeyDudes brand, which has shown flat sales year over year, with a strategy targeting young female consumers [13] - Progress has been made in clearing older HeyDude inventory and returning to full-price selling [14] - Crocs continues to generate significant cash flow, with $923.2 million in free cash flow expected in 2024, providing financial flexibility for growth initiatives [15]

Core Insights - PMPM, a skincare brand established in 2020, achieved a remarkable 100-fold growth in GMV within six months and generated sales of 4 billion yuan in just four years, with over 10 million users [1][6] - The brand's success is attributed to its ability to resonate emotionally with consumers, combining global natural ingredients with scientific research [1][6] Brand Strategy - PMPM employs a personalized branding strategy to differentiate itself in a saturated market, fostering connections with users and creating a sense of community [2][3] - The brand's core logic revolves around three personas: the Explorer persona appeals to women under 35, the Scientist persona resonates with women over 40, and the Artist persona enhances product value [3] Mission-Driven Growth - PMPM's growth is driven by aligning the founder's personal mission with the business model, creating a brand that users actively follow [6] - The brand serves as a case study for how to navigate the challenges of algorithm-driven marketing and maintain user engagement without relying solely on platform algorithms [6]

As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2024. Registration No. 333-281783 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO FORM F-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ________________________ Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ________________________ Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant's Name into English) ________________________ | Cayman Island ...

________________________ Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ________________________ Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant's Name into English) ________________________ | Cayman Islands | 5990 | Not Applicable | | --- | --- | --- | | (State or other jurisdiction of | (Primary Standard Industrial | (I.R.S. Employer | | incorporation or organization) | Classification Code Number) | Identification Number) | As filed with the U.S. Securities and Ex ...

As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2024. Registration No. 333-281783 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM F-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ________________________ Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ________________________ Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant's Name into English) ________________________ | Cayman Islan ...