Core Viewpoint - Beijing Huiyuan is facing internal conflicts and external challenges, including failed acquisitions and ongoing lawsuits, leading to a call for employees to resist "malicious capital games" [1][2][4]. Group 1: Internal Conflicts - Beijing Huiyuan's official statement criticized major shareholder Zhuji Wenshenghui for holding a unilateral shareholder meeting on August 11, which was contested by employee supervisors [2]. - The company’s labor union urged all employees not to recognize the decisions made during this meeting, indicating a significant internal divide [2][4]. - The chairman, Ju Xinyan, has filed a lawsuit against Beijing Huiyuan to confirm the validity of a company resolution, highlighting the ongoing power struggle within the company [5]. Group 2: Financial and Legal Issues - Beijing Huiyuan accused Zhuji Wenshenghui of failing to fulfill investment commitments, with 850 million yuan overdue for over a year, despite multiple reminders [4][5]. - Approximately 650 million yuan of the funds supposedly invested by Zhuji Wenshenghui is under "trapped account" status, indicating a lack of actual investment into the company's operations [4][5]. - The company has initiated legal action against Zhuji Wenshenghui and its associated entities, which has been accepted by the court [5]. Group 3: Historical Context and Recent Developments - Huiyuan Juice, established in the early 1990s, has faced severe debt crises and underwent a court-approved restructuring in June 2022, with Wensheng Assets becoming the controlling shareholder [5][10]. - The company reported a revenue of 2.745 billion yuan and a net profit of 424 million yuan in 2023, showing signs of operational improvement post-restructuring [10]. - A planned acquisition by Guozhong Waterworks was halted due to the freezing of shares related to Zhuji Wenshenghui, further complicating the company's financial situation [6][10].

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Huiyuan Workers' Union has raised objections regarding the legality and validity of the third extraordinary shareholders' meeting scheduled for 2025, urging all employees not to execute the resolutions made during this meeting [1][2]. Group 1: Legality of the Shareholders' Meeting - The Workers' Union claims that the meeting was convened unlawfully by certain individuals under the guise of the supervisory board, and that the procedures violated company regulations and governance systems [1][2]. - The Union emphasizes that the voting rights of shareholders participating in the meeting are questionable, rendering the resolutions invalid [1][2]. Group 2: Investment Obligations and Financial Control - The Union accuses Zhuji Wenshenghui of failing to fulfill half of its investment obligations, with the funds controlled directly by them and not contributing to Huiyuan's operations or profits [2]. - As of August 9, 2023, Zhuji Wenshenghui has not paid 850 million yuan of the promised investment, which has been overdue for over a year despite multiple reminders from Huiyuan [2]. Group 3: Company Background and Historical Context - Huiyuan Juice, established in the early 1990s, was once a leader in the domestic juice industry and went public in Hong Kong in 2007 [3]. - The company has faced significant financial challenges due to a combination of economic downturns and the impact of multiple rounds of the pandemic, leading to liquidity and debt risks [4]. Group 4: Legal Actions and Governance Issues - Huiyuan has initiated legal proceedings against Zhuji Wenshenghui and Shanghai Wensheng Asset Management for failing to meet investment commitments, which has been accepted by the court [5]. - The company has raised concerns about Zhuji Wenshenghui's control over the board and management despite only contributing 22.81% of the registered capital, which raises governance issues [4]. Group 5: Recent Developments and Market Perception - In July 2024, Guozhong Water announced plans to acquire shares in Zhuji Wenshenghui, aiming to become the controlling shareholder of Huiyuan [6]. - Huiyuan has publicly refuted negative claims about its business status, asserting that its operations have been improving since the successful restructuring in 2022 [6].

Core Viewpoint - The legitimacy of the third extraordinary general meeting of shareholders in 2025 held by Huayuan is being challenged, with claims of procedural violations and lack of proper shareholder representation [1][2][3] Group 1: Legitimacy of the Shareholder Meeting - Huayuan disputes the legality of the extraordinary general meeting held on August 11, citing that the meeting was convened unlawfully and that the procedures violated the company's articles of association [1] - The company claims that the meeting's resolutions are invalid due to doubts about the voting rights of participating shareholders and the legitimacy of the convening party [1][2] - The Huayuan Workers' Union has called for all departments and employees to reject the legitimacy of the meeting and its resolutions [2] Group 2: Financial Implications and Shareholder Dynamics - The core agenda of the extraordinary meeting may involve proposals related to loss compensation, dividends, or overall equity transfer [2] - A proposal by Zhuji Wenshenghui to use Huayuan's capital reserve to cover losses could potentially pave the way for future profit distribution, despite the company's negative retained earnings [3] - There are concerns that Zhuji Wenshenghui's push for dividends may be motivated by its own financial difficulties, as its parent company is reportedly facing a tight cash flow situation [3] Group 3: Legal and Governance Issues - Legal experts suggest that if Zhuji Wenshenghui has not fulfilled its investment obligations, it may face consequences such as losing its equity rights [4] - The ongoing disputes within Huayuan may lead to a power struggle, with the current chairman, Ju Xinyan, filing a lawsuit to confirm the validity of company resolutions [4] - The internal governance of Huayuan appears to be in disarray, with indications of a potential return of founder Zhu Xinli to stabilize the situation [8][10]

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Huiyuan has publicly accused its major shareholder, Zhuji Wenshenghui, of failing to fulfill capital contribution obligations, manipulating corporate governance, and infringing on the rights of minority shareholders [2][3]. Group 1: Shareholder Disputes - Zhuji Wenshenghui has not paid 850 million yuan of the promised investment, which is overdue by more than a year, despite 11 reminders [2]. - Of the actual payments made, approximately 650 million yuan remains unutilized in Huiyuan's operations, with the paid-in capital only accounting for 22.8% of Huiyuan's registered capital [2]. - Huiyuan has initiated legal proceedings against Zhuji Wenshenghui and Shanghai Wensheng Asset Management, which have been accepted by the court [2]. Group 2: Historical Context - Huiyuan was once a leading brand in the juice industry but has faced significant challenges, including a failed acquisition by Coca-Cola in 2008, which led to a decline in its market position [6][7]. - The company has undergone substantial restructuring, including the sale of 12 subsidiaries and 9 factories, resulting in a debt of 11.403 billion yuan by the end of 2017 [7]. - In 2021, Huiyuan was delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and entered bankruptcy reorganization, with Wensheng Asset becoming the new controlling shareholder [8]. Group 3: Financial Performance - Despite the turmoil, Huiyuan maintained a relatively good profitability, with projected revenues of 2.75 billion yuan and 2.48 billion yuan for 2023 and 2024, respectively, and net profits of 420 million yuan and 340 million yuan [13]. - However, internal turmoil has led to a significant drop in investment income from Zhuji Wenshenghui, with a year-on-year decrease of 43.76% [13]. - The company aims to achieve 10 billion yuan in revenue within three years, but ongoing management changes and shareholder disputes pose significant challenges to this goal [13].

Core Viewpoint - Huayuan Juice has publicly acknowledged its struggles with capital and governance issues, revealing internal conflicts and a power struggle with its major shareholder, Zhuji Wenshenghui [1][4][8]. Group 1: Company Statements and Actions - Huayuan Juice issued a statement on August 14, disputing the legality of a temporary shareholders' meeting called by Zhuji Wenshenghui, claiming the meeting's resolutions lack legal validity [1][5]. - The company accused Zhuji Wenshenghui of failing to fulfill investment commitments, describing their actions as a "malicious capital game" that threatens employee livelihoods [5][8]. - Previous statements from Huayuan had denied claims of being manipulated by capital, asserting that the company was operating normally since its restructuring in 2022 [6][8]. Group 2: Leadership and Control Issues - The return of founder Zhu Xinli to the company has been reported, while current chairwoman Ju Xinyan has filed a lawsuit against Huayuan to confirm the validity of certain company resolutions [4][10]. - Ju Xinyan's lawsuit indicates a potential internal conflict, suggesting either a challenge to decisions made by Zhuji Wenshenghui or a struggle for control within the company [13]. - The ambiguity surrounding the company's leadership and governance structure has raised concerns about decision-making processes and the overall stability of Huayuan Juice [12][14]. Group 3: Current Challenges - Huayuan Juice is facing a survival crisis due to delayed funding from Zhuji Wenshenghui, which jeopardizes its debt restructuring efforts [14]. - Governance issues are evident, with unclear shareholder meeting validity and internal disputes affecting the company's operational integrity [14]. - Trust in the brand is eroding due to perceived capital failures and public internal conflicts, which could impact relationships with distributors and consumers [14].

Core Viewpoint - Tianye Co., Ltd. is embroiled in a financial fraud scandal involving inflated revenues, manipulated costs, and misrepresented asset values, leading to significant financial restatements and potential delisting risks [1][2][3] Financial Performance - In 2024, Tianye's total profit was revised down from 34.08 million to 14.21 million, a decrease of approximately 58.3%, while net profit attributable to shareholders fell by 66.2% from 28.59 million to 9.65 million [2] - Revenue increased slightly by 7.3% compared to 2023, but net profit saw a dramatic decline of 71.5%, marking the lowest point since 2012 [2] - The company's revenue from core juice products accounted for 74.3% and 90.9% of total revenue in 2023 and 2024, respectively, but faced significant price pressures and declining margins [4][5] Client Dependency and Market Challenges - Major clients in the new-style tea beverage sector, such as Nayuki Tea and Tea Baidao, accounted for 82.9% of procurement, contributing significantly to revenue [2] - The competitive landscape has intensified, with major clients experiencing substantial losses, leading to reduced orders from Tianye [3][4] - The average price of mango juice dropped from 10,200 CNY/ton to 8,800 CNY/ton, while unit costs increased by 2%, resulting in a significant decline in gross margins [4][5] Governance and Investment Issues - Tianye established a private equity fund with Fangfu Venture Capital, but the fund's investment progress has raised concerns, with no direct project investments reported [6][7] - The fund's intended investment projects have been delayed, and there are questions regarding the legitimacy of certain transactions, including a questionable acquisition of shares in an unrelated biotech company [8][9] - Tianye has urged Fangfu to fulfill its capital contribution obligations by August 31, 2025, or risk exiting the fund [9]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing struggles of Huiyuan Juice, highlighting the conflicts between its major shareholder and the company, as well as the challenges it faces in its revival efforts after bankruptcy restructuring [3][4][5]. Group 1: Shareholder Conflicts - Huiyuan Juice's parent company, Beijing Huiyuan Food and Beverage Co., publicly accused its major shareholder of failing to fulfill a promised investment of 1.6 billion yuan, with over half of the funds still not received [5][15]. - The company has initiated legal action against the major shareholder, seeking to rally other shareholders and creditors to protect their rights [4][6]. - The major shareholder, Wensheng Asset Management, has only contributed 750 million yuan of the promised investment, with the remaining 850 million yuan overdue for over a year [15][16]. Group 2: Financial Struggles - Since its restructuring approval in June 2022, Beijing Huiyuan has relied primarily on its own resources to maintain operations and achieve continuous profitability [5][6]. - The company reported a cumulative net profit of 760 million yuan for 2023 and 2024, but it still faces approximately 8 billion yuan in debt, indicating a long road ahead to financial stability [47][48]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The juice market is becoming increasingly competitive, with both new and established players intensifying their efforts, which poses additional challenges for Huiyuan Juice as it attempts to recover [48]. - The article also notes that the major shareholder's proposal to cover losses using capital reserves may lead to further disputes, as it could affect the rights of creditors who have not yet received equity [20][22]. Group 4: Potential for A-Share Listing - There are indications that Huiyuan Juice may be on a path to potentially relist on the A-share market, which could help it recover from its previous delisting from the Hong Kong stock exchange [39][40]. - However, this plan has been complicated by legal disputes involving the major shareholder and other parties, which have led to the freezing of significant shares [40][43].

文 | 无冕财经 杨一轩 编辑 | 陈涧 这一次，汇源果汁是豁出去了。 8月9日，其母公司北京汇源食品饮料有限公司（下称"北京汇源"），在其微信公众号发布公开信，指责 大股东涉嫌出资不实、滥用控制权，表示已经提起诉讼，呼吁其他股东和债权人也采取法律手段维权。 三年前重整时约定的16亿出资款中，有超过一半资金仍未到账，这三年来，北京汇源估计主要靠自身力 量维持经营，实现连续盈利。 公开叫板昔日"白衣骑士"，试图拉拢其他股东对抗，还表示已经提起诉讼，北京汇源以撕破脸的方式放 手一搏。"国民果汁"似乎再次被资本算计。 而在今年5月，汇源果汁也因为国中水务（600187.SH）终止收购，陷入"被资本耍了"争议。但此前意欲 拿下控制权的国中水务，早就已经给了汇源大股东逾9亿的真金白银。 但事实的确如此吗？ 公开叫板大股东 北京汇源被资本"伤"了。 这样看来，在围绕汇源果汁的争斗中，国中水务及其背后的南通前首富姜照柏，似乎充当了一回"冤大 头"。 | 定遍 汇源 尊 6个朋友关注 | +关注 | ים | s | ರಿ | 0 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 1 ...

wumiancaijing.com / 大股东数亿投资款迟迟不给，想借助国中水务曲线上市，又因粤民投冻结股权被迫终止，汇源果汁的复兴之路，很是坎坷。 重要提醒！！！为防失联，请"星标"我们！进入无冕财经公众号，点击右上角"..."，再""，以便您及时接收每篇推送~ 作者：杨一轩 编辑：陈涧 这一次，汇源果汁是豁出去了。 8月9日，其母公司北京汇源食品饮料有限公司（下称"北京汇源"），在其微信公众号发布公开信，指责大股东涉嫌出资不实、滥用控制权，表示已经提起 诉讼，呼吁其他股东和债权人也采取法律手段维权。 三年前重整时约定的16亿出资款中，有超过一半资金仍未到账，这三年来，北京汇源估计主要靠自身力量维持经营，实现连续盈利。 公开叫板昔日"白衣骑士"，试图拉拢其他股东对抗，还表示已经提起诉讼，北京汇源以撕破脸的方式放手一搏。"国民果汁"似乎再次被资本算计。 这样看来，在围绕汇源果汁的争斗中，国中水务及其背后的南通前首富姜照柏，似乎充当了一回"冤大头"。 但事实的确如此吗？ 公开叫板大股东 北京汇源被资本"伤"了。 设计：岚昇 ▲"汇源"微信公众号上发布的公开信截图。 2017年，汇源果汁负债达到114亿元，后又因 ...

Core Viewpoint - The public letter from Huiyuan Juice reveals the intense capital struggle behind the company's restructuring, highlighting issues with its major shareholder, Zhuji Wenshenghui, who has failed to fulfill a promised investment of 850 million yuan, leading to governance and financial disputes [2][3][4]. Group 1: Capital Struggles - Huiyuan Juice's major shareholder, Zhuji Wenshenghui, has delayed the promised investment of 850 million yuan for over a year, despite multiple reminders from the company [2][4]. - The initial investment plan included a total of 1.6 billion yuan over three years, but only the first installment of 750 million yuan has been received, leaving a significant funding gap [4][5]. - The funds that were received have not been utilized for operational improvements, raising suspicions about Zhuji Wenshenghui's intentions [5][6]. Group 2: Governance Issues - Zhuji Wenshenghui has gained control over Huiyuan Juice's management despite contributing only 22.81% of the registered capital, leading to concerns about the fairness of governance [6][7]. - The company is worried that Zhuji Wenshenghui's control could dilute the rights of other shareholders, especially in profit distribution and decision-making processes [6][7]. - Huiyuan Juice has initiated legal action against Zhuji Wenshenghui to address these governance issues and protect shareholder rights [7]. Group 3: Market Position and Competition - Huiyuan Juice, once a leading brand in the juice industry, has seen its market share plummet from nearly 50% to approximately 11% due to intense competition from brands like Nongfu Spring and Coca-Cola [12]. - The company is at a critical juncture, facing the challenge of either reviving its brand or succumbing to market pressures [3][12]. - The failed acquisition by Guozhong Water further complicates Huiyuan Juice's path to recovery, as it was seen as a potential route back to the capital market [10][11].