最近广州的富豪圈流传着一个让人唏嘘的故事。 就在上个月，一个普通的中午，39岁身家千万的富豪陈伟杰，被推进了抢救室。 五分钟后，他的心脏停止了跳动，盖着白布被推了出来。 留下了年幼的女儿、苍老的双亲，以及停满豪车的车库，和未完成的商业计划…… 很多人第一次听到陈伟杰的名字，是通过他的车行。 作者： 洞见pumpkin 在揭阳，陈伟杰经营的车行里，大劳、宾利、玛莎拉蒂等豪华超跑一字排开。 开业那天他笑得灿烂，殊不知此时，身体里那颗炸弹已经开启了倒计时。 这一切，要从他刚开始创业说起。 洞见 （ DJ00123987 ） —— 不一样的观点，不一样的故事， 3000 万人订阅的微信大号。点击标题下蓝字 " 洞见 " 关注，我们将为您提供有 价值、有意思的延伸阅读。 每个成年人的身后，都站着一群人。 ♬ 点上方播放按钮可收听洞见主播一凡朗读音频 01 你拼命，真的会没命。 那时他在华强北做手机生意，白天黑夜颠倒着过，吃饭更是不规律，忙起来就用一碗泡面或一份外卖草草应付。 胃痛到冒冷汗时，从抽屉里摸出几片胃药吞下，转身又投入到酒局应酬中。 市场快速扩张时期，拼的就是谁能熬。 多撑几轮酒局，就能多认识几个客户，多抢几个 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the paradox of India's vast development potential and the hesitance of foreign investors, particularly from China, to invest in the country [1][3]. Group 1: Investment Challenges - Investing in India is complicated by local requirements that mandate not only the establishment of assembly plants but also the relocation of entire supply chains, which poses high sunk costs and operational risks for investors [5]. - The "all or nothing" approach to foreign investment reflects a desire for complete industrial relocation rather than genuine investment attraction, creating a sense of insecurity among potential investors [5][8]. Group 2: Business Environment - The Indian business environment is characterized by frequent sanctions and unpredictable policy risks, leading to a lack of trust among foreign investors [6]. - The perception that India seeks to monopolize the benefits of foreign investment, while being reluctant to allow foreign companies to profit, contributes to the reluctance of labor-intensive industries to invest in India despite lower labor costs compared to Southeast Asia [8]. Group 3: Market Potential - The notion that a large population equates to a vast market is challenged, as a significant portion of India's population lacks the purchasing power to drive market demand, making the effective market smaller than anticipated [10]. - The inability of a large segment of the population to become consumers of industrial products undermines the potential for real commercial profits, which is critical for modern manufacturing reliant on scale [10].

Core Viewpoint - The visit of EU leaders to China comes amid heightened tensions with the US over tariff policies, reflecting the EU's urgent need to reassess its trade relationships with both the US and China [1][3][7] Group 1: EU's Position and Concerns - The EU is caught in a complex situation, needing to navigate pressures from the US while also considering its significant trade relationship with China [1][3] - EU officials express concerns that if the market is fully opened to China, up to 50% of market share could be captured by Chinese companies, necessitating protective measures [3][4] - The EU's internal production chains, established for globalization, may face marginalization if de-globalization trends intensify [3][4] Group 2: Objectives of the Visit - The primary goals of the EU leaders' visit to China include securing more orders for EU companies and negotiating unequal tariff arrangements, where China would implement zero tariffs on EU products while maintaining some tariffs on Chinese goods [4][6] - The EU also aims to pressure China to reduce its cooperation with Russia, using sanctions as leverage [4][6] Group 3: Challenges in Negotiations - There is a fundamental conflict between the EU's requests and China's principles, particularly regarding tariff arrangements and cooperation with Russia [6][9] - The timeline for negotiations is tight, with the US imposing an August 1 deadline for new tariff agreements, leaving little room for complex discussions [6][9] - The EU's predicament highlights the broader international dynamics, where the US seeks to reshape trade rules to its advantage, often at the expense of its allies [6][9] Group 4: Implications for Global Trade - The shifting global trade landscape indicates that the EU's ability to balance relations between the US and China is diminishing, necessitating a reevaluation of its ties with China [7][9] - The outcome of the EU's negotiations with China will not only impact its economic future but also have significant repercussions for the global trade framework [9]