以下文章来源于行业研习 ，作者走南闯北的社长 行业研习 . 我们是来自高校和科研院所的老师、博士生，以及从事具体行业的业余研究者，拥有不同的学科背景和 知识背景，有丰富的田野调研或行业经验，希望通过这个平台，和大家一起绘制中国行业的图景。 本文来自微信公众号： 行业研习 ，作者：乌喵，编辑：Susu，原文标题：《乌喵丨广州：发生在 2026年的车检骗局》，头图来自：AI生成 一、可能遇到了骗局 前几天，呜喵在广州黄埔区的一家正规车检机构遭遇了一场令人不快的骗局。交了350元的检测费之 后，乌喵在大厅等候区找了个位置坐下，掏出刚买不久的《花村肖像》，津津有味地看了起来。正当 乌喵沉浸在花村的故事之中，工作人员突然告知说车辆的OBD有问题，他们没法检测，只能等乌喵 把车修好再送过来检测。 虽然很不情愿，但是乌喵也没有任何办法。第二天，乌喵把车开到常去的一家修车厂，问老板到底啥 是OBD。老板用手机查了查，念到：OBD，就是On-Board Diagnostics，车载自动诊断系统，是汽车 电子控制系统的核心通信接口，其功能覆盖车辆健康监测、排放控制、数据交互等多个领域；它通过 传感器实时监控发动机、三元催化、氧传 ...

为切实筑牢春节期间市场监管安全防线，按照《兰州市市场监督管理局春节期间"守护四安"专项行动工 作方案》部署安排，2月10日，市市场监管局党组成员、副局长马小忠带领市局特种设备科、产品质量 科、认证认可科、新闻应急科执法人员，联合属地市场监管部门开展市场监管领域安全检查。 检查组对兰州炜旭汽车检测有限公司、甘肃鑫天泰机动车检测有限公司开展检查，重点排查机构是否持 续保持资质认定的基本条件与技术能力、是否存在不按检验标准开展检测、出具不实或虚假检验检测报 告等违法违规行为，切实压实机动车检验机构主体责任，持续提升机动车检验行业规范化管理水平。 在兰州飞天浏阳烟花制造有限公司、甘肃国通烟花爆竹批发有限公司、甘肃铃铛烟花爆竹批发有限公 司，检查组对流通领域烟花爆竹产品质量开展检查，重点检查是否销售"三无"产品以及包装标识不全、 国家明令淘汰并停止销售的烟花爆竹。在兰州兴业金属容器有限责任公司，检查组督促企业严格落实质 量安全主体责任，从源头防范质量安全风险。检查组对兰州金城宴等餐饮服务单位进行检查，督促餐饮 服务单位严格执行食品安全管理制度，切实担负起食品安全第一责任人的职责，确保群众春节期间"舌 尖上的安全"。 随 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of illegal modifications to heavy-duty trucks that significantly increase their emissions, particularly through the installation of a small screw on the exhaust temperature sensor, which prevents the proper functioning of the vehicle's emissions control system [1][3][5]. Group 1: Illegal Modifications and Their Impact - The installation of a screw on the exhaust temperature sensor can lead to a substantial increase in nitrogen oxide emissions, making a single modified truck equivalent to the emissions of several compliant trucks [3][4]. - Despite increased enforcement efforts, illegal modifications are still prevalent, with reports of such practices across multiple provinces in China [2][4]. - The environmental impact is significant, as heavy-duty trucks account for over 80% of nitrogen oxide emissions from motor vehicles, contributing to air pollution [3][7]. Group 2: Enforcement and Regulatory Measures - Local enforcement agencies have intensified inspections, but illegal modifications continue to undermine environmental efforts, necessitating a coordinated approach among various regulatory bodies [4][8]. - The central government has issued guidelines to strengthen the regulation of diesel truck emissions, including regular checks for unauthorized modifications [7][8]. - Legal experts emphasize the need for stricter penalties against online sales of illegal modification parts, which violate consumer protection laws [7]. Group 3: Economic Incentives for Modification - Truck drivers are motivated to modify their vehicles due to significant cost savings on urea, with annual expenses potentially reduced by thousands of yuan [5][6]. - Online platforms are facilitating the sale of these illegal modification kits, often accompanied by instructional content, making it easier for drivers to perform the modifications themselves [6][7]. Group 4: Future Directions and Solutions - There is a call for a comprehensive approach to tackle the issue, including collaboration between environmental, transportation, and market regulatory agencies [8]. - Encouraging the adoption of new energy heavy-duty trucks is suggested as a long-term solution, as the cost gap between electric and diesel trucks is narrowing [8].

Group 1 - The core point of the announcement is the cancellation of the qualification certificate for the inspection and testing institution of Chongzuo Ansheng Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. by the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Market Supervision Administration [1] - The cancellation is based on relevant regulations including the Administrative Licensing Law of the People's Republic of China and the Administrative Measures for the Qualification Accreditation of Inspection and Testing Institutions [1] - The company is prohibited from issuing inspection and testing data and results with evidential effect to the public from the date of cancellation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing efforts by market regulatory authorities in China to combat fraudulent vehicle inspection practices, emphasizing the importance of protecting public safety and the environment through strict enforcement actions against violators [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The market regulatory department, in collaboration with ecological environment and public security departments, has intensified efforts to punish fraudulent vehicle inspection behaviors and has revoked the qualifications of several illegal institutions [1]. - On January 4, the State Administration for Market Regulation announced eight typical cases of illegal vehicle inspection institutions [1]. Group 2: Typical Cases of Fraud - The cases include various forms of fraud, such as issuing false emission inspection reports, fabricating inspection data, tampering with engine control unit information, and altering vehicle identification numbers [2]. - Specific examples include: - Zhangbei Zhongren Vehicle Inspection Company in Hebei was penalized for issuing false emission inspection reports, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification [1]. - Shanghai Minhang Vehicle Inspection Service Company was found to have committed fraud during inspections of 41 vehicles, resulting in administrative penalties and the cancellation of its inspection qualifications [2]. - Anhui Huaiyuan Modern Vehicle Inspection Company used an "OBD interference device" to commit fraud during emissions testing of 80 vehicles, leading to the cancellation of its inspection qualifications [2]. - Two companies in Guangzhou, Jiu Long Vehicle Inspection Company and Hongjing Vehicle Inspection Company, faced penalties for issuing false inspection reports and altering inspection conditions, respectively [2].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has announced eight typical cases of illegal activities by vehicle inspection agencies, highlighting issues such as issuing false emission inspection reports and manipulating inspection data, which directly impact public safety and environmental protection [1][2][3] Group 1: Cases of Illegal Activities - Hebei Zhangbei Zhongren Vehicle Inspection Company issued false emission inspection reports, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Hebei Market Regulation Bureau [1] - Shanghai Minhang Vehicle Inspection Service Company was found to have manipulated data during emission inspections, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualification by the Shanghai Minhang District Market Regulation Bureau [1] - Anhui Huaiyuan Modern Vehicle Inspection Company used an "OBD interference device" to falsify emission inspection results, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Bengbu Market Regulation Bureau [1] - Guangdong Jiulong Vehicle Inspection Company falsified original data during safety technical inspections, resulting in fines and the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Guangzhou Huangpu District Market Regulation Bureau [1] Group 2: Additional Cases of Fraud - Guangdong Hongjing Vehicle Inspection Company manipulated inspection data using props and falsified original inspection data, leading to fines and the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Guangzhou Huadu District Market Regulation Bureau [2] - Guangxi Quanzhou Tongda Vehicle Inspection Company altered engine control unit information and used identical software codes to replace different vehicle models' OBD information, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualification by the Guangxi Market Regulation Bureau [2] - Gansu Lanzhou Huajun Vehicle Inspection Company issued false safety technical inspection reports for 793 heavy low-bed semi-trailers by repeatedly altering vehicle identification numbers, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Gansu Market Regulation Bureau [2] Group 3: Regulatory Actions - Xinjiang Dadao Xiyu Vehicle Inspection Company was fined for issuing false safety technical inspection reports by changing vehicle license plate numbers, resulting in the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Xinjiang Market Regulation Bureau [3] - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated a nationwide special rectification action against vehicle inspection agencies that do not comply with national standards, manipulate inspection data, or issue false reports, leading to strict penalties and revocation of inspection qualifications [3] - Agencies found to have committed serious violations may face criminal charges for providing false certification documents [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the serious violations by various vehicle inspection companies in China, emphasizing the issuance of false emission and safety inspection reports, which undermines road safety and environmental protection efforts [1][2][3]. Group 1: Violations by Inspection Companies - Hebei Zhangbei Zhongren Vehicle Inspection Company issued false emission inspection reports, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Hebei Market Supervision Bureau [1]. - Shanghai Minhang Vehicle Inspection Service Company was found to have falsified data during emission testing, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualification by the Shanghai Minhang District Market Supervision Bureau [1]. - Anhui Huaiyuan Modern Vehicle Inspection Company used an "OBD interference device" to falsify emission test results, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Bengbu Market Supervision Bureau [1]. - Guangdong Guangzhou Jiulong Vehicle Inspection Company was penalized for falsifying original data during safety technical inspections, resulting in fines and the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Guangzhou Huangpu District Market Supervision Bureau [1]. Group 2: Additional Cases of Fraud - Guangdong Hongjing Vehicle Inspection Company used props and falsified original inspection data, leading to fines and the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Guangzhou Huadu District Market Supervision Bureau [2]. - Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Quanzhou Tongda Vehicle Inspection Company manipulated engine control unit information and used identical software codes to falsify emission test results, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualification by the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Market Supervision Bureau [2]. - Gansu Lanzhou Huajun Vehicle Inspection Company issued false safety technical inspection reports for 793 heavy low-platform semi-trailers by altering vehicle identification numbers, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification by the Gansu Market Supervision Bureau [2]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The National Market Supervision Administration has launched a nationwide special rectification campaign targeting vehicle inspection institutions that fail to comply with national standards, alter inspection data, or issue false inspection reports [3]. - Violations are subject to penalties from public security and environmental authorities, with serious offenders being placed on a list of severely untrustworthy entities and potentially facing criminal charges for providing false documentation [3].

Core Viewpoint - The market regulatory authorities are intensifying efforts to combat fraudulent vehicle inspection practices to protect public safety and the environment, resulting in the revocation of several inspection agencies' qualifications [1] Group 1: Case Summaries - Hebei Zhangbei Zhongren Vehicle Inspection Company was found to have issued false emission inspection reports, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification in July 2025 [2] - Shanghai Minhang Vehicle Inspection Service Company engaged in fraudulent practices during emission tests for 41 vehicles between June and August 2024, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualification in May 2025 [3] - Anhui Huaiyuan Modern Vehicle Inspection Company was penalized for falsifying emission test results for 80 vehicles from May to July 2024, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification in June 2025 [4] - Guangdong Jiulong Vehicle Inspection Company was found to have fabricated data during safety inspections of 4 vehicles from July to September 2024, resulting in penalties and revocation of its inspection qualification in February 2025 [5] - Guangdong Hongjing Vehicle Inspection Company was penalized for falsifying inspection data for 2 vehicles in April and May 2024, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification in May 2025 [6] - Guangxi Quanzhou Tongda Vehicle Inspection Company was found to have manipulated engine control unit information for 254 vehicles from January to October 2024, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualification in August 2025 [7] - Gansu Lanzhou Huajun Vehicle Inspection Company issued false safety inspection reports for 793 heavy-duty trailers from July 2023 to March 2024, leading to the revocation of its inspection qualification in March 2025 [8] - Xinjiang Dadao Xiyu Vehicle Inspection Company was penalized for falsifying inspection reports in September 2024, resulting in the revocation of its inspection qualification in July 2025 [9]

Group 1 - A gas station in Baise was found using a cheating system to manipulate fuel measurement and tax data, leading to severe penalties and being listed as a serious violation [2] - A vehicle inspection company in Guangxi was discovered to have issued 254 false vehicle emission reports by tampering with the onboard diagnostic system, resulting in the cancellation of its inspection qualifications [3] - A gas company in Baise was penalized for using uninspected gas pressure pipelines, posing significant safety risks, and was also listed as a serious violation [4] Group 2 - A food company in Guilin was found to be using excessive food additives and obstructing regulatory investigations, leading to heavy fines and being listed as a serious violation [5] - A bun shop in Fangchenggang was found to have excessive sweetener levels in its products, refused to comply with administrative penalties, and was subsequently listed as a serious violation [6][7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that the implementation of the prosecutor's recommendations has effectively promoted the timely and full collection of tax payments in the vehicle inspection industry [1][2] Group 2 - The prosecutor's office discovered a case of tax evasion in the vehicle inspection industry, leading to the investigation of three companies based on discrepancies between reported income and actual business operations [1] - A model for supervising tax evasion in vehicle inspection institutions was utilized, analyzing data from the past five years, which revealed significant inconsistencies in reported income [1] - Following the prosecutor's recommendations, the tax authority established a special team to rectify issues, resulting in the collection of over 2 million yuan in taxes and penalties [2] Group 3 - The investigation led to the identification of inflated costs and inaccurate pricing practices among the three vehicle inspection companies, contributing to the enforcement of tax compliance [2] - One associated company was found to owe 70,000 yuan in land and property taxes, further ensuring market order and preventing state asset loss [2] - The case exemplifies the effective use of digital tools in legal supervision, enhancing the quality of legal oversight to support high-quality economic and social development [2]