（来源：市场星报） 星报讯 12月30日，省政府新闻办召开新闻发布会，省市场监督管理局介绍安徽"十四五"期间市场监管 工作有关情况。记者从会上获悉，"十四五"时期，全省食品安全工作连续6年、质量工作先后4年、知识 产权保护工作连续4年、打击侵权假冒工作连续5年在国家级考核中获得A级或优秀等次。 目前，全省已建立覆盖省、市、县三级的公平竞争审查制度，累计审查涉及经营者经济活动的政策措施 2.5万份，清理妨碍统一市场和公平竞争政策措施文件4.9万份。安徽市场环境指标得分连续2年位居全国 第4。 安徽还出台优化消费环境促进放心消费若干措施，深入推进"放心消费在安徽"行动。全省12315平台共 接收投诉举报咨询678.88万件，为消费者挽回经济损失7.79亿元，12315效能评价稳居全国前列。累计发 展线下无理由退货承诺单位10.23万家，在线纠纷企业和解成功率87.38%，高于全国平均水平34个百分 点。 全省上下围绕新能源汽车等19个重点产业开展质量强链行动，质量基础设施能力、品牌建设成效和质量 总体水平显著提升，国家、省级质检中心分别达到28个和72个。获得中国专利奖金奖7项，中国质量奖 提名奖8个。全省制造业 ...

央视网消息：据国家市场监督管理总局网站消息，日前，市场监管总局对《制止滥用行政权力排除、限 制竞争行为规定》进行修订。其中提出，国家市场监督管理总局负责滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为 的反垄断统一执法工作。省级市场监管部门查处滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为时，发现不属于本部 门查处范围，或者虽属于本部门查处范围，但有必要由市场监管总局查处的，应当及时报告市场监管总 局。详情如下： 制止滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为规定 （2025年12月18日国家市场监督管理总局令第115号公布 自2026年2月1日起施行） 第一条 为了预防和制止滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为，根据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》（以下 简称反垄断法），制定本规定。 第二条 国家市场监督管理总局（以下简称市场监管总局）负责滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为的反 垄断统一执法工作。 市场监管总局根据反垄断法第十三条第二款规定，授权各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府市场监督管理部 门（以下称省级市场监管部门）负责本行政区域内滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为的反垄断执法工 作。 本规定所称反垄断执法机构包括市场监管总局和省级市场监管部门。 第三条 市场监管总局负责 ...

国家发展改革委产业发展司 传统产业既包括国民经济发展必需的重要基础原材料产业和重大装备产业，也包括满足人们生活需要的 消费品产业，是实体经济的重要组成，是我国现代化产业体系的基底。党的二十届四中全会通过的《建 议》提出"建设现代化产业体系，巩固壮大实体经济根基"，把"优化提升传统产业"放在更加突出位置， 这是以习近平同志为核心的党中央作出的重大部署。我们要深刻学习领会，系统总结"十四五"时期传统 产业发展成绩，把准"十五五"时期传统产业优化提升的目标和工作着力点，持续深入抓好贯彻落实。 一、"十四五"时期我国传统产业发展取得显著成效 国家发展改革委认真贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署，会同有关部门把传统产业发展放在重要位置， 推动我国传统产业综合实力稳步增强，核心竞争力持续提升，进一步巩固和增强了产业国际竞争力。 高端化发展卓有成效。修订实施《产业结构调整指导目录(2024年本)》，明确树立鼓励高端先进、限制 淘汰落后的产业发展导向。聚焦产业链重点环节技术产品，加强关键核心技术攻关，促进科技成果转化 和示范应用，持续推进补链强链。印发实施推进品牌建设政策文件，高质量办好中国品牌日系列活动， 编制实施质量强国纲要 ...

对新能源汽车、锂电池、光伏等"新三样"产业，关键在于规范秩序、创新引领。"新三样"产业是我国在 激烈市场竞争下培育出的优势产业，是我国外贸高质量发展的新引擎，在全球绿色产业变革中彰显了中 国力量，但也面临市场竞争失序、核心优势还不牢固等问题挑战。"十五五"时期，要综合整治"内卷 式"竞争，维护公平竞争环境，提高行业集中度，打造全球技术领先高地。规范市场竞争秩序，深入实 施公平竞争审查制度，加强价格监测、质量检查，防止低价无序竞争。加强供应链治理，保障中小企业 款项支付，营造行业互利共赢良好生态。加大技术创新力度，巩固技术领先优势。加强宏观调控，坚持 用市场化、法治化手段推动落后低效产能退出。强化行业自律，发挥行业协会作用，引导企业培育差异 化竞争优势，弘扬企业家精神。 大力推动传统产业优化提升 对新能源汽车、锂电池、光伏等"新三样"产业，关键在于规范秩序、创新引领。 12月26日，国家发展改革委产业发展司发表题为《大力推动传统产业优化提升》的文章指出，对钢铁、 石化等原材料产业，关键在于平衡供需、优化结构。原材料行业是我国国民经济的重要基础产业和支柱 产业。当前，钢铁、石化等原材料行业普遍面临供需动态性平衡不 ...

核心阅读 反垄断法律体系更加系统，执法程序规定更加规范，针对平台经济等重点领域的规定更加完善，对经营 主体的合规指引更加明确，提高了反垄断法的可预期性和可操作性。 □ 本报记者 万静 消除制约要素资源流动堵点 2022年3月《中共中央 国务院关于加快建设全国统一大市场的意见》要求"强化竞争政策基础地位"。党 中央、国务院涉及市场准入、要素配置、招标投标、政府采购的政策措施，针对各类市场主体面临的市 场壁垒，均要求促进公平竞争，破除制约全国统一大市场建设的体制机制障碍，为反垄断法治建设奠定 了坚实的政策基础。 2022年8月反垄断法完成首次修改，将鼓励创新纳入立法目的，增加平台经济反垄断等规定，规定了更 严格的法律责任，更加有利于保护公平竞争，促进创新和高质量发展。2023年12月《国务院关于经营者 集中申报标准的规定》完成修订，调整申报标准，降低经营者集中制度性交易成本。 2024年6月《公平竞争审查条例》公布，以行政法规系统规定审查标准、机制和监督保障，实现公平竞 争审查的法治化。相关法律法规建立了反垄断和公平竞争审查工作的法治基础。民营经济促进法等重要 立法也设立公平竞争专章，要求保证民营企业等各类经济组 ...

Core Points - The National Market Regulation Administration has taken significant actions against monopolistic practices, including 35 cases of monopoly agreements and 25 cases of abuse of market dominance, resulting in a total fine of 2.93 billion yuan [1] - The administration has also concluded 950 cases related to business concentration in the livelihood sector, supporting companies in improving operational efficiency through mergers and acquisitions [1] Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement in Key Sectors - In the pharmaceutical sector, 12 major cases were handled over three years, with fines totaling 1.219 billion yuan, 362 million yuan, and 223 million yuan for specific companies, leading to price reductions of over 40% for involved drugs, with some reductions reaching 95% [1] - In public utilities, 16 cases of monopolistic behavior in water, electricity, gas, and heating sectors were addressed, resulting in fines of 183 million yuan, effectively curbing practices like bundled sales and ensuring consumer choice [1] Group 2: Platform Economy Regulation - The administration is enhancing regular supervision of the platform economy, focusing on competitive behaviors and issues like "lowest price" guarantees and "choose one of two" practices, aiming to protect the interests of small merchants and consumers [2] - A draft guideline for antitrust compliance in internet platforms has been released for public feedback, aiming to provide practical guidance for platform enterprises and address monopolistic behaviors [2][3] Group 3: Future Regulatory Focus - Future regulatory efforts will emphasize breaking local protectionism and administrative monopolies, which are crucial for optimizing the business environment and protecting consumer interests [3] - The administration plans to increase enforcement against the abuse of administrative power, promote fair competition review systems, and enhance policy coordination to ensure a unified national market [3][4] Group 4: Comprehensive Regulatory Approach - The administration adheres to a dual approach of regulation and service, employing a comprehensive regulatory toolset to promote self-discipline among enterprises and ensure a healthy market environment [4] - A core regulatory mechanism focusing on risk warning, compliance guidance, and precise regulation will be further refined to foster a competitive and orderly market environment [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to balance data security and data flow, highlighting that data security and utilization are complementary rather than opposing [1] - Establishing a clear and actionable set of rules is crucial for ensuring data security, particularly in key sectors like industry and energy [1] - The proposal includes the development of practical guidelines for data classification and protection requirements based on the importance of the data [1] Group 2 - Legislative efforts are being made to support emerging industries, particularly in the context of artificial intelligence and semiconductors, reflecting the needs of enterprises [6] - The Guangdong Province has adopted suggestions to encourage technological innovation and fair competition, demonstrating a proactive legislative approach [6] - Local legislative contact points are actively engaging with small and medium-sized enterprises to gather feedback and address their concerns [6][8] Group 3 - The establishment of legislative contact points has expanded significantly, with over 11,500 supporting units and a service network covering approximately 186 million people [10] - The focus on grassroots governance is evident, as contact points are integrating their work with local community needs and legal education [10] - The recent legislation in Shaanxi Province aims to protect wild birds, marking a significant step in environmental law and community involvement in conservation efforts [12][14]

Core Viewpoint - Jinan City is actively promoting the construction of a law-based government and aims to become a national model for law-based governance, focusing on fair competition and market regulation [1][3]. Group 1: Fair Competition Implementation - The implementation of the fair competition system is a key task for optimizing the business environment and establishing a national model for law-based governance in Jinan [3]. - A joint meeting composed of 24 departments has been established to coordinate and promote fair competition efforts, having held 8 meetings and addressed 12 topics since its inception [3]. - Jinan is the first pilot city in Shandong Province to require fair competition review as a prerequisite for policy measures, ensuring that policies affecting economic activities undergo fair competition review before legal review [3][4]. Group 2: Policy Review and Regulation - A four-level review process has been established, including self-review by departments, third-party evaluations, joint reviews by market regulation departments, and legal reviews by judicial departments [3]. - In the current year, a total of 337 policy measures have been reviewed, with 82 at the municipal level and 255 at the district and county levels, promoting a fair market environment from the source [3][4]. - Continuous special inspections have been conducted over three years to address inappropriate market interventions, resulting in the identification of 1,883 policy measures related to economic activities [4]. Group 3: Future Initiatives - Jinan will strengthen the enforcement of fair competition reviews and ensure the responsibilities of document drafting units are upheld [4]. - The city plans to continue identifying and eliminating regulations that hinder market competition and promote fair competition through various outreach activities [4].

Core Viewpoint - The construction of a unified national market is essential for establishing a high-level socialist market economy, with a focus on the unification of systems and rules [1][3]. Summary by Relevant Sections National Unified Market Construction - The central government has outlined the goal of building a "highly efficient, standardized, and fair competition" national unified market, emphasizing the unification of systems and rules [3]. - The basic requirements for this construction can be summarized as "five unifications and one openness," which include unifying market basic systems, infrastructure, government behavior standards, market supervision and law enforcement, and resource markets, while continuously expanding both domestic and foreign openness [3]. Achievements and Actions - Multiple actions have been taken to eliminate market barriers, addressing significant issues of local protectionism and market segmentation, with 115 typical cases reported publicly [3][4]. - A system has been established for rectifying improper interventions in the construction of the national unified market, with over 1,100 problem leads collected, and more than 90% of valid issues have been rectified by local authorities [3][4]. Key Tasks and Developments - Significant progress has been made in tasks aimed at enhancing market connectivity, including the revision of the negative list for market access and the implementation of various regulatory documents [4]. - Nearly 90% of national highway service areas have been equipped with reserved charging parking spaces, and an online trading service platform for the secondary land market has been launched [4]. - The establishment of a fair competition review system has been initiated, achieving coverage at national, provincial, municipal, and county levels, and has been integrated into government document processes [4]. Market Access Improvement - The central government has issued opinions on improving market access systems, aiming to create a more open, transparent, and competitive market environment [5]. - The dynamic revision of the negative list for market access is part of efforts to foster a fair and predictable development environment for enterprises, promoting the free flow of resources and advancing the construction of a unified national market [5].

Core Points - The central theme of the articles is the commitment to eliminate obstacles in the construction of a unified national market in China over the next five years, as outlined in the recent guidelines from the Central Committee [1][2]. Group 1: National Market Construction - The guidelines emphasize the need to standardize local government economic promotion behaviors and address "involution" competition, aiming to create a fair and competitive market environment [1][2]. - Specific measures include improving foundational institutional rules for the unified market, enhancing property rights protection, market access, information disclosure, social credit, mergers and acquisitions, and market exit systems [1][2]. - The focus is on eliminating barriers related to resource acquisition, qualification recognition, bidding, and government procurement, as well as regulating local government economic promotion behaviors to dismantle local protectionism and market segmentation [1][2]. Group 2: Competition Policy and Local Government Behavior - The guidelines link competition policy with the construction of a unified national market, indicating that deficiencies in existing fiscal and assessment systems may hinder market development [2][4]. - There is a historical context where local governments have provided tax incentives and subsidies to attract investment, which, while beneficial in some aspects, disrupts market order and fair competition [2][3]. - The need for effective regulation of local government economic promotion behaviors is highlighted, as past neglect has led to issues such as "involution" competition, where local governments' financial incentives encourage unhealthy price competition among businesses [4][5]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Future Directions - The articles reference previous attempts to regulate tax incentives, noting that a 2014 directive aimed to clean up such policies but was ultimately postponed [3][4]. - The guidelines call for a comprehensive review and elimination of policies that promote local protectionism and market fragmentation, with a focus on ensuring fair competition [5][6]. - The introduction of the Fair Competition Review System is seen as a critical step in preventing local governments from issuing preferential policies that distort competition [6][7].