Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant drop in the virtual skin trading market for the game CS2, which lost approximately $2 billion (around 142 billion RMB) in a single day due to a new policy by the game's developer, Valve Corporation (V社) [5][28]. Group 1: Market Impact - On October 24, the CS2 skin trading market experienced a dramatic decline, with assets evaporating in just a few hours [5][7]. - Valve's new policy allowed lower-tier skins to be combined into higher-tier skins, drastically reducing the value of previously rare items [10][12]. - The price of popular items, such as the butterfly knife, saw a significant drop, with some players reporting losses of up to 600,000 RMB [14][16]. Group 2: Player Reactions - Many players expressed their frustration on social media, blaming Valve's CEO for the sudden market crash [18][21]. - Professional players and skin traders faced substantial financial losses, while some players viewed the policy change as beneficial for regular gamers [24][28]. Group 3: Economic System Design - Valve's economic system for CS skins has evolved over the years, starting from the introduction of cosmetic items in Team Fortress 2 to a complex trading platform in CS:GO [30][35]. - The market for CS skins became a significant financial derivative platform, with a peak market value exceeding $6 billion (approximately 43 billion RMB) [38]. - The lack of regulation and the speculative nature of the market have led to repeated cycles of boom and bust, similar to traditional financial markets [50][51].

Core Viewpoint - The recent collapse of the CS2 virtual skin trading market has resulted in a loss of approximately $2 billion in a single day, affecting many players who treated these skins as investments [3][4][5]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - Valve Corporation (V社), the developer of CS2, announced a game update allowing lower-tier skins to be combined into high-tier skins, drastically reducing the value of previously rare items [5][7][9]. - The price of top-tier skins, such as knives and gloves, has plummeted, with some players reporting losses of up to 600,000 yuan [9][11]. - The skin trading market, which once had a peak valuation of over $6 billion, has seen a significant shift in user demographics from gamers to speculators [25][35]. Group 2: Economic System Design - Valve's economic system for CS skins has been described as more complex than that of many small countries, with a focus on creating a vibrant trading environment [16][22]. - The introduction of a trading platform by Valve allowed for a thriving secondary market, leading to inflation and deflation within the skin economy [16][26]. - The lack of regulation in the skin market has led to repeated cycles of speculation and crashes, similar to historical financial bubbles [27][35]. Group 3: Community Reactions - Many players express frustration towards Valve's new policies, viewing them as detrimental to the skin trading community while others see it as a positive change for regular players [11][15]. - The community has witnessed significant emotional responses, with some players losing substantial amounts of money and others feeling vindicated by the collapse of speculators [11][15][30]. - The recent events have sparked discussions about the sustainability and ethics of virtual item trading as a form of investment [27][35].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent collapse of the virtual skin trading market for the game CS2, which resulted in a loss of approximately $2 billion (around 142 billion RMB) in a single day, affecting many players who treated these skins as investments [9][11][52]. Group 1: Market Collapse - The virtual skin trading market for CS2 experienced a dramatic decline, with a reported loss of $2 billion in just one day [9]. - The decline was triggered by Valve's announcement allowing players to synthesize high-value skins from lower-tier skins, drastically reducing the rarity and value of existing high-end skins [15][18]. - Many players, particularly those who had invested heavily in skins, faced significant financial losses, with some reporting losses of up to 600,000 RMB [23][26]. Group 2: Valve's Strategy - Valve's introduction of a skin synthesis feature is seen as a strategic move to revitalize the official market and increase player engagement by making high-value skins more accessible [56]. - The company has historically designed a complex economic system around its games, which has led to the emergence of a substantial external trading market [39][47]. - Valve's economic model has been criticized for lacking regulation, leading to speculative trading and market volatility, similar to financial markets [68][69]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article traces the origins of the virtual skin market back to Valve's 2007 game "Team Fortress 2," which introduced a trading system that allowed players to buy and sell cosmetic items [40][42]. - The success of this model was further developed in "CS:GO," where skins became a significant part of the game's economy, leading to a market that at one point exceeded $6 billion [52]. - The rise of speculative trading in CS skins began around 2020-2021, with many players treating them as investment assets, akin to cryptocurrencies [48].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent collapse of the virtual skin trading market for the game CS2, which resulted in significant financial losses for many players, likening it to a stock market crash [8][11][63]. Group 1: Market Collapse - On October 24, the CS2 skin trading market lost $2 billion (approximately 14.2 billion RMB) in just a few hours [8]. - The introduction of a new game update allowed players to synthesize high-value skins from lower-tier ones, drastically reducing the value of previously rare items [14][19]. - Many players, including skin traders and professional players, faced severe financial losses, with some losing up to 600,000 RMB [25][30]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The skin trading market for CS2 evolved from a gaming feature to a significant financial market, with a peak valuation exceeding $6 billion (approximately 43 billion RMB) [63]. - The market's growth was fueled by speculative trading, with players treating skins as investment assets, similar to cryptocurrencies and NFTs [59][60]. - The lack of regulation and the volatility of the market led to significant risks for investors, as evidenced by the recent crash [85]. Group 3: Company Strategy - Valve Corporation (V社), the developer of CS2, has strategically designed the skin economy to maximize its profits, including implementing a 15% transaction fee on official trades [68]. - The company has shifted its focus from being a game developer to operating more like a financial institution, capitalizing on human psychology and market dynamics [86][87]. - The introduction of new policies is seen as a way to reinvigorate the market for regular players while sidelining speculators who do not engage with the game [69].