兄弟们，好事儿啊，汽车上的物理按键可能真要回来了。 前段时间，在大陆彼岸的欧洲就出现了一波对取消物理按键的反思潮。 比如大众汽车设计总监安德烈亚斯·明特，他直接一个认错 + 反思，表示" 汽车不是手机 "，之前在高尔夫 Mk8 上做的数字化并不先进，" 我们不会再犯这 样的错误 " 。 说白了，就是我们要在未来的新车上把物理按键加回来。 所以你看，最近大众、宝马很多新车都重新加回了物理按键，像这次的 ID.2 all （以后可能叫 Polo ）就在大屏下方加入了音量、风扇、温度、座椅加热和 双闪的按钮。 苦于大屏操作的老司机们，终于可以开香槟咯。 要说这波反思潮的源头，其实可以追溯到去年 3 月，当时 E-NCAP （欧洲新车安全评鉴协会）就声明：从 2026 年起，只有配备物理按键的汽车，才有资 格获得 E-NCAP 的五星认证。 但实际用下来发现，这个设计除了好看，其实没啥实质性的便利。咱们最直觉的操作，还是靠手感，而不是电子屏幕的点击，或者语音。 这里面说了，汽车上的转向灯、喇叭、挡风玻璃雨刷、 SOS 呼叫等等功能，都必须有拨杆或者旋钮的方式来操作。所以现在这些车企也主要是为了拿满 五星顺势而为。 总 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "anti-human design" in automobiles, categorizing designs into two types: those that compromise user experience for aesthetics or cost, and those that, while seemingly counterintuitive, are based on engineering logic or industry standards [1][36]. Group 1: Unreasonable Designs - Hidden door handles are popular among new energy vehicles for their aesthetic appeal and slight reduction in drag coefficient, but the energy savings are minimal, leading to user inconvenience in cold weather and potential safety issues [3][4][5]. - The trend of eliminating physical buttons in favor of touchscreens can create safety hazards, as drivers must navigate menus instead of using simple buttons to adjust settings [7][8]. - The removal of physical "close" buttons for features like electric tailgates can lead to awkward user experiences when the sensor fails [10]. Group 2: Reasonable Designs - The gear shift logic of placing the reverse (R) gear in front of the drive (D) gear is based on historical conventions that enhance usability and safety during parking maneuvers [11][12]. - The design of rear seat angles, which may feel uncomfortable, is actually intended to improve comfort and safety by preventing passengers from sliding during collisions [15][18][21]. - The thickening of the A-pillar, while reducing visibility, is a necessary compromise for structural integrity and safety during collisions, with modern technology providing solutions to mitigate blind spots [23][25][28]. Group 3: Safety Considerations - Delays in automatic window operations are designed to prevent accidents, particularly for children and pets, reflecting a safety-first approach in engineering [29][30]. - The article emphasizes that many designs perceived as "anti-human" are actually rooted in safety, comfort, and regulatory compliance, highlighting the importance of understanding the rationale behind these choices [33][36].