Core Points - Tesla is facing scrutiny due to issues with its electronic door handles, which have reportedly malfunctioned, leading to safety concerns for passengers, including children being trapped inside vehicles [1][5] - The U.S. authorities are investigating approximately 174,000 Tesla vehicles for potential risks associated with the electronic door handle failures, which could result in recalls if deemed unsafe [5] - The irony lies in Tesla's initial popularity for its hidden door handle design, which has now become a point of contention and potential regulatory change [5] Group 1: Design and Safety Concerns - The hidden door handle design, while aesthetically pleasing and aimed at reducing wind resistance, has raised significant safety concerns, particularly in cold weather where handles may freeze [6][12] - Reports indicate that incidents of accidents due to door handle failures have increased by 47% year-on-year, with hidden door handles accounting for 82% of these cases [13] - Testing shows that electronic door handles have a success rate of only 67% in side-impact collisions, compared to 98% for traditional mechanical handles, highlighting a significant safety gap [13][17] Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Market Trends - A draft national standard is expected to ban fully hidden door handles, allowing only semi-hidden and traditional designs, with a transition period until July 2027 [5][18] - The automotive industry may shift towards semi-hidden door handles as a compromise between aesthetics and safety, with several new models already adopting this design [20][23] - The market is likely to see a decline in fully hidden door handles, prompting manufacturers to reassess their design strategies to prioritize safety alongside modern aesthetics [20][26]

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of a new national standard by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology in China will phase out the "one-pedal driving" mode, which was previously seen as a hallmark of electric vehicle (EV) intelligence, marking a significant milestone in EV braking safety [2][4][19]. Group 1: New Regulations and Industry Impact - The new regulation will take effect on January 1, 2027, with a two-year grace period for car manufacturers [4]. - The regulation aims to ensure that vehicles do not come to a complete stop solely through the release of the accelerator pedal, addressing safety concerns associated with the one-pedal mode [3][19]. - The introduction of this standard has sparked intense discussions within the industry regarding the safety and practicality of the one-pedal mode [5]. Group 2: Safety Concerns and User Experience - Critics argue that many users have not fully experienced the benefits of the one-pedal mode, leading to a lack of understanding and adaptation [6]. - Research indicates that 32% of drivers have mistakenly pressed the accelerator instead of the brake in emergencies, with 15% resulting in accidents [13]. - A study from Tsinghua University shows that drivers accustomed to the one-pedal mode may experience a 0.3-second delay in emergency braking, equating to an additional stopping distance of 8.3 meters at 100 km/h [14]. Group 3: Historical Context and Technological Evolution - The one-pedal driving concept originated with the first-generation BMW i3 and gained popularity through Tesla's aggressive promotion [8][10]. - Tesla's implementation of the one-pedal mode aimed to maximize energy recovery, reportedly increasing urban range by 15%-20%, equivalent to an additional 80 kilometers for the Model 3 [11]. - The decline of the one-pedal mode reflects a broader trend in the automotive industry, moving away from minimalist designs towards a renewed focus on user control and safety [25][26]. Group 4: Design Trends and Future Directions - The shift away from the one-pedal mode is part of a larger reconsideration of minimalist design principles in the automotive sector, as evidenced by the resurgence of physical buttons and controls [33][35]. - The European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) has introduced new regulations requiring physical controls for safety functions to achieve high safety ratings, further influencing design trends [34]. - The automotive industry is now seeking a balance between innovative design and essential safety features, moving towards a more user-centric approach [44][45].

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is experiencing a debate between "technology" and "safety," sparked by Ferrari CEO Benedetto Vigna's comments on the ineffectiveness of in-car screens, emphasizing that cars are meant for driving, not for entertainment [1] Group 1: Trends in Automotive Design - The automotive interior design is diverging into two trends: the minimalist tech approach represented by Tesla, which uses a central touchscreen to replace most physical buttons, and the traditional approach upheld by companies like Ferrari, which values the tactile feedback of physical controls [4] - The "efficiency-first" camp advocates for touchscreen operations that align with digital-native user habits, while the "safety-first" camp emphasizes the irreplaceable nature of physical buttons in emergencies [4] - The European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) warns that integrating all functions into screens increases the risk of accidents due to driver distraction [4] Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Industry Response - The recent regulations from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) regarding hidden door handles in electric vehicles signal a shift in the automotive industry from a focus on aesthetics and technology to prioritizing safety and practicality [5] - Volkswagen plans to reintroduce physical buttons for core functions across all models starting in 2026, reflecting market recognition of the safety benefits of physical controls [4] Group 3: Systemic Safety Risks - The safety crisis in smart vehicles has evolved from mechanical failures to systemic risks, including the elimination of hardware redundancies, increased cognitive load from human-machine interaction, and vulnerabilities in software security [6] - The average time a driver’s gaze is diverted from the road when using a touchscreen is 1.5 seconds longer than with physical buttons, significantly increasing accident risk [6] Group 4: Innovations in Safety Design - The automotive industry is seeking breakthroughs in safety through advancements in materials and architecture, such as solid-state batteries and fire-resistant electrolytes [7] - New safety designs, like BMW's iDrive system, aim to reduce reliance on touchscreens by enhancing voice control response times [7] - Regulatory bodies are implementing stricter safety standards, compelling manufacturers to invest significantly in safety technology [7] Group 5: Future of Automotive Safety Standards - The automotive safety revolution is underway, with a focus on integrating proactive, passive, and operational safety measures [10] - Future regulations will likely become more stringent, with increased emphasis on safety design and technology investment by manufacturers [9] - Consumers are expected to prioritize safety ratings and features in their purchasing decisions, making safety a critical factor in the automotive market [9]

撰 文 / 钱亚光 设 计 / 赵昊然 "我们对下一代内饰的构想是，尽可能让驾驶员的目光停留在道路上……所以（从安全角度考虑） 你其实不想让人们去看屏幕，而是让他们保持与视线水平的位置。"现代汽车设计副总裁西蒙·洛阿 斯比（Simon Loasby）介绍新车时说。 他向Autocar UK透露，该公司将于2026年推出其下一代产品中，为了优先考虑安全性，车内仍会提 供实体按钮，而触摸屏可能会变得更小，并运行更易用的操作系统。 现代汽车北美设计公司副总裁Hak-soo在接受韩国中央日报（JoongAng Daily）采访时曾谈到了这一 转变，他承认公司是被大型一体化屏幕式信息娱乐系统所带来的"惊艳"效果所吸引才做出这一决定 的。但显然，消费者对此并不买账。 Hak-soo 表示："我们在车辆中添加集成式（信息娱乐）屏幕时，也尝试过采用基于触摸屏的控制方 式，但人们并不喜欢那样。" 汽车制造商正回归复古潮流，在汽车上重新配备实体控制装置，同时摒弃那些曾被吹捧为驾驶未来 趋势的时尚触控屏幕。 实体按键的存与废 汽车上的首个触摸屏可以追溯到近四十年前的1986年款别克Riviera车型。当时的应用程序是一个由 阴极射 ...