隐藏式门把手的设计并非新生事物，其历史可追溯至1952年，当时搭载在奔驰300SL上，主要目的是降低风阻。然而，真正让它流行起来的，是2012年特斯 拉ModelS采用的电控弹出式设计。这一创新引发了众多新能源车企的效仿，隐藏式门把手逐渐成为新能源车的科技感标配，甚至部分燃油车也加以跟进。 有数据显示，到2025年，国内新上市的新能源车型中，超过五成装配了隐藏式门把手，部分头部车企更是实现了全系车型标配。 但看似科技感十足的隐藏式门把手，实际效果不尽如人意。据测试，它仅能带来0.0012cd的风阻微弱改善，对电动车续航的提升也仅仅只有几公里。相比之 下，其带来的弊端日益凸显。如在实际使用中，当气温较低时，门把手容易被冻住，无法正常弹出。更为严重的是，在一些交通事故中，车辆碰撞后隐藏式 门把手可能无法自动弹出，同时内门把手隐藏在看不见的凹槽内，导致乘客在紧急情况下无法快速开门下车，增加了救援难度和时间，威胁乘客的生命安 全。 此次新国标的出台，意味着因新能源汽车快速发展而流行起来的隐藏式门把手将逐渐退出历史舞台。新规对车企设置了过渡期：对于新申请批准的车型， 2027年1月1日起，需满足除"手部操作空间"外的全 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "anti-human design" in automobiles, categorizing designs into two types: those that compromise user experience for aesthetics or cost, and those that, while seemingly counterintuitive, are based on engineering logic or industry standards [3]. Group 1: Unreasonable Designs - Hidden door handles are a popular design among new energy vehicles, reducing drag coefficient by 0.003 Cd, which translates to a minimal energy saving of 0.15-0.18 kWh per 100 km, but they pose usability issues in cold weather and emergency situations [6][7]. - The trend of eliminating physical buttons in favor of touchscreens can create safety hazards, as drivers must navigate menus to adjust settings, which detracts from driving focus [9][10]. - The removal of physical "close" buttons for electric tailgates in favor of remote or sensor activation can lead to awkward situations when the sensor fails [12]. Group 2: Reasonable Designs - The gear shift logic of placing the R (reverse) gear in front of the D (drive) gear is based on long-standing conventions that enhance usability and safety during parking maneuvers [14][16]. - The design of rear seat angles, which may feel uncomfortable, is actually intended to improve comfort and safety by preventing occupants from sliding during collisions [20][23]. - The thickening of the A-pillar for structural integrity in collisions is a necessary compromise for safety, despite creating blind spots [24][26]. - Delayed response in automatic window controls is a safety feature designed to prevent accidents involving children or pets, reflecting a preference for safety over speed [29][30]. Group 3: Impact of Smart Technology - The rise of smart technology in vehicles has led to a new wave of interface confusion, as many designs prioritize aesthetics over practical usability, often neglecting the driving context [32]. - Market feedback is increasingly influencing design choices, leading to a return of some physical controls and a shift away from purely aesthetic features like hidden door handles [33]. - The effectiveness of a design should be judged not just on its innovation but on its understanding of user needs and daily usability [35].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "anti-human design" in automobiles, categorizing designs into two types: those that compromise user experience for aesthetics or cost, and those that, while seemingly counterintuitive, are based on engineering logic or industry standards [1][36]. Group 1: Unreasonable Designs - Hidden door handles are popular among new energy vehicles for their aesthetic appeal and slight reduction in drag coefficient, but the energy savings are minimal, leading to user inconvenience in cold weather and potential safety issues [3][4][5]. - The trend of eliminating physical buttons in favor of touchscreens can create safety hazards, as drivers must navigate menus instead of using simple buttons to adjust settings [7][8]. - The removal of physical "close" buttons for features like electric tailgates can lead to awkward user experiences when the sensor fails [10]. Group 2: Reasonable Designs - The gear shift logic of placing the reverse (R) gear in front of the drive (D) gear is based on historical conventions that enhance usability and safety during parking maneuvers [11][12]. - The design of rear seat angles, which may feel uncomfortable, is actually intended to improve comfort and safety by preventing passengers from sliding during collisions [15][18][21]. - The thickening of the A-pillar, while reducing visibility, is a necessary compromise for structural integrity and safety during collisions, with modern technology providing solutions to mitigate blind spots [23][25][28]. Group 3: Safety Considerations - Delays in automatic window operations are designed to prevent accidents, particularly for children and pets, reflecting a safety-first approach in engineering [29][30]. - The article emphasizes that many designs perceived as "anti-human" are actually rooted in safety, comfort, and regulatory compliance, highlighting the importance of understanding the rationale behind these choices [33][36].