汽车反人类设计

Search documents
汽车上的那些反人类设计,到底冤不冤?
虎嗅APP· 2025-05-23 13:25
车不只是代步工具,还是生活的一种刻度。 以下文章来源于autocarweekly ,作者autocarweekly autocarweekly . 本文来自微信公众号: autocarweekly (ID:autocarweekly) ,作者:七号宋,题图来自:AI生成 如果你问一位用车多年的老司机,汽车上有哪些反人类设计?大概率他会列出一堆让人摸不着头脑的 功能或布局:隐藏式门把手、换挡逻辑、车机菜单深到离谱的操作路径、座椅角度难受得让人腰酸背 痛…… 这些常被吐槽的设计,真的是设计师脑子进水吗?其实,汽车上的反人类设计,大致可以分成两类: 第一类是确实为了视觉效果、营销噱头或成本压缩而妥协的用户体验黑洞;第二类则是看似反直觉, 实则背后有明确的工程逻辑或行业规范。 不合理派:看着炫,真用起来就 抓狂 隐藏式门把手 这个设计算是新势力车型的集体沉迷对象,看着不仅酷,而且还能节能降耗呢。一项数据表明,风阻 系数仅降低了0.003Cd,每降低0.001Cd的风阻可大约降低0.05~0.06度电 (百公里耗电量) 。 但这么算下来,百公里才节约0.15~0.18度电,都不够吹会儿暖风的。而且,为此我们得忍受冬天手 ...
汽车上的那些反人类设计,到底冤不冤?
Hu Xiu· 2025-05-22 08:37
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "anti-human design" in automobiles, categorizing designs into two types: those that compromise user experience for aesthetics or cost, and those that, while seemingly counterintuitive, are based on engineering logic or industry standards [1][36]. Group 1: Unreasonable Designs - Hidden door handles are popular among new energy vehicles for their aesthetic appeal and slight reduction in drag coefficient, but the energy savings are minimal, leading to user inconvenience in cold weather and potential safety issues [3][4][5]. - The trend of eliminating physical buttons in favor of touchscreens can create safety hazards, as drivers must navigate menus instead of using simple buttons to adjust settings [7][8]. - The removal of physical "close" buttons for features like electric tailgates can lead to awkward user experiences when the sensor fails [10]. Group 2: Reasonable Designs - The gear shift logic of placing the reverse (R) gear in front of the drive (D) gear is based on historical conventions that enhance usability and safety during parking maneuvers [11][12]. - The design of rear seat angles, which may feel uncomfortable, is actually intended to improve comfort and safety by preventing passengers from sliding during collisions [15][18][21]. - The thickening of the A-pillar, while reducing visibility, is a necessary compromise for structural integrity and safety during collisions, with modern technology providing solutions to mitigate blind spots [23][25][28]. Group 3: Safety Considerations - Delays in automatic window operations are designed to prevent accidents, particularly for children and pets, reflecting a safety-first approach in engineering [29][30]. - The article emphasizes that many designs perceived as "anti-human" are actually rooted in safety, comfort, and regulatory compliance, highlighting the importance of understanding the rationale behind these choices [33][36].