然而，细究美高层宣称的这些"成果"，水分着实不小。所谓降低关税换取配合、放松稀土管制等说法，目前仅有部分内容得到有限证实——仅确定东方大国 采购一定量农产品后，某类关税从20%降至10%。稀土出口问题疑似需每年谈判，甚至可能涉及以稀土换特定芯片的交换条件，其余内容均未明确。市场此 前因会晤氛围对成果预期过高，如今看来，美高层此番表态更像是自我标榜的"政绩秀"，试图将有限进展包装成重大突破。 事实上，双方在核心利益、贸易规则等领域的分歧仍未得到有效化解，单边施压与利益交换难以构建长期稳定的合作关系。历史经验表明，对抗只会加剧双 边关系平等协商、互利共赢才是破局之道。 10月30日下午，《华尔街日报》报道称，美高层在会晤后表示，美国将立即下调部分关税，以此换取某东方大国配合打击特定化学品出口，该化学品与某类 物质生产相关。美贸易代表还称，东方大国将放宽稀土出口管制措施。此外，美高层透露，东方大国同意大规模采购大豆，且农产品采购将迅速启动。 合则二利，斗则二伤。希望双方关系正常发展，推进世界和平与进步！ ...

Core Points - The EU and the US have reached a new trade agreement aimed at avoiding a larger trade war, with the EU committing to stop importing Russian oil and gas in exchange for reduced US tariffs [1][3] - The EU plans to purchase $750 billion worth of energy products from the US over the next three years, diversifying its energy sources and enhancing energy security [1][4] - The agreement includes a 15% tariff on US imports from the EU, but certain categories will have zero tariffs, which has raised concerns among some European officials about the balance of the deal [4][5] Group 1 - The EU will completely abandon imports of Russian oil and gas, opting instead to purchase American energy, which is expected to contribute to European energy security [1] - The EU's energy purchases from the US will include liquefied natural gas, oil, and nuclear fuel, with a clear goal to eliminate reliance on Russian fossil fuels by 2027 [1][3] - The agreement is seen as beneficial primarily to the US, with critics arguing it could lead to deindustrialization in Europe and increased energy costs [3][4] Group 2 - The deal is expected to result in an additional $600 billion investment from the EU into the US, which some European officials view as detrimental to local employment and industry [4][5] - The agreement has faced criticism for being unbalanced, with concerns that it mirrors previous US trade tactics that pressured other nations [4][5] - European leaders have expressed dissatisfaction with the agreement, viewing it as a capitulation to US interests at the expense of European economic strength [5]