今年苹果发布会，Travis Scott 惊喜到场，穿了双苹果球鞋与库克同框！ 2.3 2 POS 对于这波双向奔赴大家也不意外了，毕竟苹果 CEO 库克经常穿 Nike。 不久前在东京银座 Apple Store 重新开业，库克就穿着一双定制版 Nike Vomero Plus 亮相。 最近则是库克被拍到上脚了话题度极高的闪电倒钩 Air Jordan 1 Low。 15 12 12 目前 Travis Scott 官网已经显示了售罄的英文字样。 TRAVISSCOTT.COM EXCLUSIVE 字样，表面极有可能仅在 TS 官网登场，至于是否登陆国区 SNKRS 还要再等等。 后续库克还会带来哪些惊喜上脚，不妨拭目以待吧！ 「部分图片来源于网络，如牵涉版权 请联系 feedback@flightclub.cn 更正」 Pic via：Nic Coury/Getty Images/Travis Scott ...

报道称，相比于英伟达、高通等被中方调查的美企，苹果公司在中美贸易战中受到的影响相对较轻。此 前，这家美国科技巨头已向特朗普政府作出过投资承诺。 报道援引一位驻上海的政府事务顾问的话称，美国企业在中美问题上普遍谨慎，担心若表现得"过于亲 华"，可能会激怒白宫，从而致使其美国国内业务被牵连。 与此同时，美企也不希望被中方视为态度不诚恳，毕竟此前已作出"在中国，为中国"的承诺。 近年来，苹果尝试将部分生产能力转移至印度，但依旧高度依赖中国的供应商和工厂。 今年5月，特朗普敲打说，他对库克感到不满，并批评了苹果将生产线从中国分散至其他地区的做法， 敦促其将生产重心转向美国本土。8月，苹果宣布，将在美国追加1000亿美元投资。 而在中国市场，今年3月，苹果宣布一笔新的投资基金，计划扩大在中国的清洁能源产能。这笔投资达 7.2亿元人民币，将助力苹果在2030年实现供应链100%使用可再生能源。 据工业和信息化部网站消息，10月15日，工信部部长李乐成在北京会见美国苹果公司首席执行官蒂姆· 库克，双方就苹果公司在华业务发展、加强电子信息领域合作等议题进行交流。 路透社注意到，库克在会见中表示将继续加大在华投资，这表明其"无 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around India's response to the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Indian imports, which has led to a reevaluation of India's international political and economic relationships [4][9] - The U.S. President Trump has criticized India's high tariffs and non-tariff barriers, claiming a significant trade deficit with India, which has resulted in increased tensions [4][11] - India has indicated plans to retaliate against U.S. tariffs by potentially increasing tariffs on U.S. goods, as stated by Indian officials, although these responses have not been confirmed by Prime Minister Modi [9][11] Group 2 - The economic implications for India are significant, as the country is heavily reliant on Russian oil imports at discounted prices, and the new tariffs could strain its economy further [9][12] - The BRICS nations, including China, Russia, India, and Brazil, are seen as a potential counterbalance to U.S. economic pressure, with India possibly reconsidering its alliance with the U.S. in favor of closer ties with these nations [11][12] - India's economic statistics, including GDP and per capita income, are questioned for their accuracy, suggesting that the country may not be as robust as it claims, which could impact its negotiating power [11]